← UPST forward model

UPST · Forward model · Balance-sheet lending · Bear case

What has to happen in Balance-sheet lending

Model as of

This page changes Balance-sheet lending inside the complete UPST model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.

UPST forward model
Horizon
Consolidated fair value $11.10 all other verticals held in this portfolio case
Final-quarter revenue $18M 3% of company revenue
Explicit segment contribution $241M EBITDA less segment capex, before corporate items

Upstart beat and did not raise. That is the whole case. Management's own macro index sat at 1.50, the top of the 1.40-1.50 band the full-year guide assumes, and had risen in each of the previous three months - so the reiterated guide says credit is getting worse at the same rate the business is getting better. This case decelerates originations across all five product lines, gives back the contribution recovery Core just made, and prices what Upstart is if the marketplace is a fee business with a credit cycle attached: a fixed cost base of 53% of revenue that does not move when volume does.

Balance-sheet lending

Basis quarter$17M
Final quarter$18M
Implied CAGR+1%
Final revenue mix3%

Not a product Upstart sells - the line that makes its GAAP results jump around. Interest income on the roughly $1.06B of loans it holds at fair value, less interest expense on the $2.0B of borrowings that fund them, plus the mark-to-market on both. It contributed $16.7M in the basis quarter and $31.2M the quarter before, with no cost allocated against it, so it drops almost entirely to operating income. The book is more secured than the fee mix suggests: $338.1M of auto loans and $229.0M of HELOCs, held to seed products Upstart cannot yet sell in volume.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $19M Reported
2025 Q4 $31M Estimated
2026 Q1 $31M Reported
2026 Q2 $17M Reported
Interest income on loans held at fair valueInterest expense on warehouse and securitisation borrowingsFair value and other adjustments, net
Capacity energised 1064 $M of loans at the basis quarter $1,064M of loans held at fair value at 30 June 2026, of which $338.1M is auto and $229.0M is HELOCs.
Capacity added 40 $M of loans/qtr changing 0.0% per quarter $40M a quarter, the $79.7M the book grew in the first half, halved. A fraction of origination growth, by design.
Utilisation 100% gliding toward 100% Definitional at 100%: the net yield below is derived from this same period-end book.
Revenue per $M of loans $15682/qtr drifting 0.0% per quarter $16.7M of net interest and fair-value adjustments over a $1,064M book - a 5.9% annualised net yield.
Balance-sheet lending

Latest: $18M (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2025Q1 $28M
2025Q2 $17M
2025Q3 $19M
2025Q4 $31M
2026Q1 $31M
2026Q2 $17M
2026Q3E $17M
2026Q4E $17M
2027Q1E $17M
2027Q2E $17M
2027Q3E $17M
2027Q4E $18M
2028Q1E $18M
2028Q2E $18M
2028Q3E $18M
2028Q4E $18M
2029Q1E $18M
2029Q2E $18M
2029Q3E $18M
2029Q4E $18M
2030Q1E $18M
2030Q2E $18M
2030Q3E $18M
2030Q4E $18M
2031Q1E $18M
2031Q2E $18M

Assumptions & reasoning

  • This line exists so the six verticals sum to Upstart's reported total revenue. The five product lines are fee revenue only; total revenue also carries net interest and mark-to-market, and that is what sits here.
  • It ranged from $16.5M to $31.2M across the six quarters shown with no trend, and went negative as recently as 2024 Q3. Modelling it as a steady yield on a slowly growing book understates how much of it is remeasurement rather than carry.
  • The $2.0B of borrowings that fund the book are treated as a claim on equity in the valuation, not as an operating cost here, which is why net cash is negative $1.55B rather than the cash balance alone.
  • If the intention is to read this as a pure fee-platform valuation, this is the line to zero out. It is 5% of revenue and the only part of the projection that is not a fee.
UPST model map

Explore another vertical