← TSM forward model

TSM · Forward model · High Performance Computing · Bear case

What has to happen in High Performance Computing

Model as of

This page changes High Performance Computing inside the complete TSM model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.

TSM forward model
Horizon
Consolidated fair value $201.80 all other verticals held in this portfolio case
Final-quarter revenue $46.35B 83% of company revenue
Explicit segment contribution $258.30B EBITDA less segment capex, before corporate items

The depreciation arrives. TSMC spent NT$496bn on capital expenditure in the basis quarter alone, and its depreciation was FLAT year over year in the first half - NT$359.5bn against NT$359.0bn - because the fabs are not in service yet. That is a timing gap, not a saving, and it closes. Management already guides gross margin down to 65-67% next quarter from 67.7%, citing the 2-nanometer ramp and overseas fabs. This case runs HPC decelerating from 20% sequential while the cost of the capacity built to serve it lands, and prices TSMC as what it is on the balance sheet: a business converting 39% of revenue into plant every quarter.

High Performance Computing

Basis quarter$26.53B
Final quarter$46.35B
Implied CAGR+12%
Final revenue mix83%

Two thirds of TSMC and effectively all of its growth. AI accelerators, datacenter CPUs and GPUs, and high-end compute - the platform every AI chip designer in the world routes through. It was 51% of revenue eight quarters ago and 66% now, and it grew 20% sequentially in the basis quarter while the company grew 12%. TSMC does not break out an AI line; AI sits inside this one, and the company will not size it. What makes this platform different from the other five is that it is the one bidding for leading-edge capacity: 2-nanometer began contributing revenue this quarter and 7-nanometer and below is 77% of wafer revenue.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $18.87B Estimated
2025 Q4 $18.55B Estimated
2026 Q1 $21.90B Estimated
2026 Q2 $26.53B Estimated
AI acceleratorsDatacenter CPUs and GPUsHigh-end compute
Sequential growth +17.0%/qtr decaying toward +2.5% 17% a quarter against the 20% just delivered. Still four times the company's terminal rate, and decaying from the start.
High Performance Computing

Latest: $46.35B (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2024Q3 $11.98B
2024Q4 $14.25B
2025Q1 $15.06B
2025Q2 $18.04B
2025Q3 $18.87B
2025Q4 $18.55B
2026Q1 $21.90B
2026Q2 $26.53B
2026Q3E $30.11B
2026Q4E $33.33B
2027Q1E $36.13B
2027Q2E $38.53B
2027Q3E $40.53B
2027Q4E $42.16B
2028Q1E $43.47B
2028Q2E $44.51B
2028Q3E $45.30B
2028Q4E $45.90B
2029Q1E $46.32B
2029Q2E $46.62B
2029Q3E $46.80B
2029Q4E $46.89B
2030Q1E $46.91B
2030Q2E $46.88B
2030Q3E $46.79B
2030Q4E $46.67B
2031Q1E $46.52B
2031Q2E $46.35B

Assumptions & reasoning

  • Revenue here is total company revenue multiplied by the platform percentage TSMC publishes on one slide of its quarterly deck. The percentages are whole numbers and sum to exactly 100 in all eight quarters, so the six lines reconcile to reported revenue exactly - but each line carries up to half a percentage point of rounding, which on this platform is about $200M.
  • TSMC publishes no revenue, no margin and no capacity for HPC. It publishes a percentage of revenue and a sequential growth rate, and nothing else - which is why this vertical has a growth driver and the same margin as the other five.
  • The one volume metric TSMC does publish is company-wide: 4,336 thousand 12-inch equivalent wafers in the basis quarter, up 3.9% sequentially against revenue up 12.0%. The gap is price and mix - blended revenue per wafer rose to about $9,300 - and almost all of it is this platform moving to leading-edge nodes.
  • Two-nanometer contributed 3% of wafer revenue for the first time this quarter and 7-nanometer and below reached 77%. That node ramp is the physical event behind this platform's growth, and TSMC guides gross margin DOWN to 65-67% next quarter partly because of it.
TSM model map

Explore another vertical