SPCX · Forward model · Space
What has to happen in Space
Model as of
This page changes Space inside the complete SPCX model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.
Shares this vertical and portfolio case. Slider and horizon edits stay in your browser.
Space
Basis quarter$960M
Final quarter$1.72B
Implied CAGR+12%
Final revenue mix3%
External commercial and government launch plus Dragon crew/cargo and Starship development milestones. A cost centre with strategic optionality: it subsidises the other two segments at internal cost and only approaches break-even as Starship reusability lands.
Last four quarters
2025 Q3
$950M
Estimated
2025 Q4
$900M
Estimated
2026 Q1
$450M
Estimated
2026 Q2
$960M
Reported
External Falcon 9 / Heavy launchesDragon crew and cargoStarship development milestones (HLS)
Units
15/qtr
growing +4.0% per quarter
15 external flights a quarter. Internal Starlink launches are a cost, not segment revenue.
Price per unit
$64M
drifting −1.0% per quarter
$64M average across commercial, government and Dragon, from $960M of Q2 revenue over the flight count.
Space
Latest: $1.72B (2031Q2E)
| Period | Value |
|---|---|
| 2025Q1 | $1.20B |
| 2025Q2 | $1.05B |
| 2025Q3 | $950M |
| 2025Q4 | $900M |
| 2026Q1 | $450M |
| 2026Q2 | $960M |
| 2026Q3E | $988M |
| 2026Q4E | $1.02B |
| 2027Q1E | $1.05B |
| 2027Q2E | $1.08B |
| 2027Q3E | $1.11B |
| 2027Q4E | $1.14B |
| 2028Q1E | $1.18B |
| 2028Q2E | $1.21B |
| 2028Q3E | $1.25B |
| 2028Q4E | $1.29B |
| 2029Q1E | $1.32B |
| 2029Q2E | $1.36B |
| 2029Q3E | $1.40B |
| 2029Q4E | $1.44B |
| 2030Q1E | $1.49B |
| 2030Q2E | $1.53B |
| 2030Q3E | $1.58B |
| 2030Q4E | $1.62B |
| 2031Q1E | $1.67B |
| 2031Q2E | $1.72B |
Assumptions & reasoning
- Only external customers are counted. Internal Starlink launches are by far the larger share of flights but are an internal cost transfer, not revenue — treating them as revenue would double-count the constellation the Connectivity segment already pays for.
- Modelled on flights x price because both move independently and in opposite directions: Starship adds cadence while reusability lowers what the market will pay per kilogram. A revenue growth rate would collapse two opposing forces into one number.
- Margin starts deeply negative at -35% and glides only to 8% by the end of the horizon. Starship development is expensed here while its benefit accrues to Connectivity, so this segment carries cost for value that shows up in another line.
- This is the segment where the model is least sensitive and least confident. It is roughly 5% of revenue by the final quarter, so even a large error barely moves the fair value — but a Starship schedule slip would also slow the constellation, and that does move it.