SPCX · Forward model · Starlink Mobile
What has to happen in Starlink Mobile
Model as of
This page changes Starlink Mobile inside the complete SPCX model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.
Shares this vertical and portfolio case. Slider and horizon edits stay in your browser.
Starlink Mobile
Basis quarter$0
Final quarter$1.54B
Final revenue mix3%
The enhanced direct-to-handset service, not the messaging bolt-on that exists today. It needs the V2 Mobile satellites - ~50 per Starship flight, roughly 100x the data density - and the EchoStar spectrum before there is enough capacity to sell rather than to bundle. That makes it a 2028 business with a 2026 announcement, and the gap is the whole risk.
Last four quarters
2025 Q3
$0
Estimated
2025 Q4
$0
Estimated
2026 Q1
$0
Estimated
2026 Q2
$0
Reported
MNO wholesale revenue share on the enhanced tierPaid voice and data plans in partner marketsDirect retail on EchoStar spectrum (optional, unmodelled)
Subscribers
100K
0.0% of a 900.0M addressable base
100K on the early direct-to-cell tier. This is a handset base, so its ceiling is a different order.
Addressable subscribers
900.0M
the S-curve ceiling
900M handsets on partner carriers in markets with real coverage gaps — devices, not households.
Net adds
1.0M/qtr
ramping toward 9.0M/qtr, throttled as the base approaches the TAM
1M a quarter at launch. Carrier partnerships, not satellite capacity, gate the early ramp.
Net-add ceiling
9.0M/qtr
what supply can deliver at full rate
9M a quarter once the partner base is live. Adds ramp toward this rather than compounding at 12%.
ARPU
$6.00/mo
drifting +1.0% per quarter, floor $0.00
$6 a month: above the light tier, far below the $66 dish ARPU. Still a wholesale slice, not a retail price.
Non-subscriber revenue
$0/qtr
growing 0.0% per quarter
Zero. Any direct retail on EchoStar spectrum would land here; none is modelled.
Starlink Mobile
Latest: $1.54B (2031Q2E)
| Period | Value |
|---|---|
| 2025Q1 | $0.00 |
| 2025Q2 | $0.00 |
| 2025Q3 | $0.00 |
| 2025Q4 | $0.00 |
| 2026Q1 | $0.00 |
| 2026Q2 | $0.00 |
| 2026Q3E | $0.00 |
| 2026Q4E | $0.00 |
| 2027Q1E | $0.00 |
| 2027Q2E | $0.00 |
| 2027Q3E | $0.00 |
| 2027Q4E | $0.00 |
| 2028Q1E | $37M |
| 2028Q2E | $89M |
| 2028Q3E | $156M |
| 2028Q4E | $235M |
| 2029Q1E | $327M |
| 2029Q2E | $429M |
| 2029Q3E | $541M |
| 2029Q4E | $662M |
| 2030Q1E | $791M |
| 2030Q2E | $928M |
| 2030Q3E | $1.07B |
| 2030Q4E | $1.22B |
| 2031Q1E | $1.38B |
| 2031Q2E | $1.54B |
Assumptions & reasoning
- Modelled on monetised users x wholesale ARPU because the economics are a revenue share, not a price SpaceX sets. Growth comes from carriers signing, not from users churning in and out.
- Zero revenue for six quarters is the point of this vertical. The light service already earns money and is counted in Starlink; what is modelled here is only the step-change the V2 satellites and the EchoStar spectrum unlock, and none of it can be sold before end-2027.
- Margin glides 40% to 68% - higher than the dish business, because the incremental cost of a direct-to-cell user is close to zero once the satellites are up. Capex intensity starts at 140% while the dedicated V2 fleet is built and falls to 25%.
- Reaching roughly 70M monetised users by 2031 sounds aggressive against ~22M light actives today, but the constraint is carrier packaging rather than coverage, and coverage is already near-global. The load-bearing assumption is ARPU: at $3 rather than $6 this vertical is worth half, and the carriers set that number, not SpaceX.