AMD · Forward model · Gaming · Bear case
What has to happen in Gaming
Model as of
This page changes Gaming inside the complete AMD model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.
Shares this vertical and portfolio case. Slider and horizon edits stay in your browser.
Gaming
Basis quarter$779M
Final quarter$368M
Implied CAGR−14%
Final revenue mix3%
Semi-custom console SoCs plus Radeon discrete GPUs. $779M in the basis quarter, down 31% year over year on lower semi-custom. This is a console-cycle trough, not a franchise collapse. Opening growth is zero: the Q1-to-Q2 bounce is not a new cycle.
Last four quarters
2025 Q3
$1.30B
Reported
2025 Q4
$843M
Reported
2026 Q1
$720M
Reported
2026 Q2
$779M
Reported
Semi-custom SoCs for game consolesRadeon discrete GPUsSemi-custom development services
Sequential growth
0.0%/qtr
decaying toward +0.5%
Zero. Year-over-year still −31% on semi-custom. The Q1-to-Q2 bounce is not a new console cycle.
Gaming
Latest: $368M (2031Q2E)
| Period | Value |
|---|---|
| 2025Q1 | $647M |
| 2025Q2 | $1.12B |
| 2025Q3 | $1.30B |
| 2025Q4 | $843M |
| 2026Q1 | $720M |
| 2026Q2 | $779M |
| 2026Q3E | $748M |
| 2026Q4E | $718M |
| 2027Q1E | $691M |
| 2027Q2E | $664M |
| 2027Q3E | $639M |
| 2027Q4E | $615M |
| 2028Q1E | $593M |
| 2028Q2E | $571M |
| 2028Q3E | $550M |
| 2028Q4E | $530M |
| 2029Q1E | $511M |
| 2029Q2E | $493M |
| 2029Q3E | $475M |
| 2029Q4E | $458M |
| 2030Q1E | $442M |
| 2030Q2E | $426M |
| 2030Q3E | $411M |
| 2030Q4E | $396M |
| 2031Q1E | $382M |
| 2031Q2E | $368M |
Assumptions & reasoning
- The 2025 H2 prints ($1.3B, $843M) were semi-custom. Q2 2026 at $779M is that cycle rolling off, which is why opening growth is zero rather than the +8% sequential bounce.
- Margin 12% is below the 15.2% Client-and-Gaming blend because semi-custom is the weaker half. AMD does not publish Gaming operating income. If you think discrete GPUs are the future of this line, the margin slider is where that lives.
- A next-generation console win would show up as a delayed jump, not as 0.5% terminal growth. That is a bull-case claim this line does not make.