← SPCX forward model

SPCX · Forward model · Model layer · Bull case

What has to happen in Model layer

Model as of

This page changes Model layer inside the complete SPCX model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.

SPCX forward model
Horizon
Consolidated fair value $467.81 all other verticals held in this portfolio case
Final-quarter revenue $18.05B 18% of company revenue
Explicit segment contribution $31.38B EBITDA less segment capex, before corporate items

ARPU stabilises on enterprise mix and direct-to-cell scale, Starship reaches high cadence and low cost, AI capacity scales toward multi-GW with pricing power held. Origin converts GitHub's reliability year into migrations and takes roughly half of GitHub's book — worth about $4B a year at our estimate of its current run rate — on top of Cursor's own seat growth, reaching about $18B a year by 2031. Model layer reaches roughly 30% of the pool - Grok at frontier quality, cheaper and faster, taking a third of the market from the incumbents.

Model layer

Basis quarter$0
Final quarter$18.05B
Final revenue mix18%

Grok sold as a model rather than as a megawatt: tokens, seats and API calls, competing with Anthropic and OpenAI for a pool that booked a combined $18.3B in the June quarter. Modelled as market x share, because share is the only quantity the argument for this line is ever made in - and the finding is that the pool's growth rate matters more than the share does.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $0 Estimated
2025 Q4 $0 Estimated
2026 Q1 $0 Estimated
2026 Q2 $0 Reported
Grok API and token revenueGrok consumer and enterprise subscriptions
Capacity energised 18850 $M of market at the basis quarter $18,850M a quarter: Anthropic $11.6B plus OpenAI $6.7B plus Grok $0.55B. Press-reported, none of it audited.
Capacity added 1131 $M of market/qtr changing +6.0% per quarter $1,131M added in the first quarter, which is 6% of the pool - the rate the whole line is most sensitive to.
Utilisation 3% gliding toward 18% Share of the pool, not utilisation: Grok's $0.55B against $18.85B is 2.9% at the June quarter.
Revenue per $M of market $1.00M/qtr drifting 0.0% per quarter $1M per unit, because the unit IS $1M of quarterly market. This input only rescales the pool.
Model layer

Latest: $18.05B (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2025Q1 $0.00
2025Q2 $0.00
2025Q3 $0.00
2025Q4 $0.00
2026Q1 $0.00
2026Q2 $0.00
2026Q3E $864M
2026Q4E $1.21B
2027Q1E $1.59B
2027Q2E $2.01B
2027Q3E $2.47B
2027Q4E $2.98B
2028Q1E $3.53B
2028Q2E $4.14B
2028Q3E $4.80B
2028Q4E $5.53B
2029Q1E $6.33B
2029Q2E $7.21B
2029Q3E $8.17B
2029Q4E $9.22B
2030Q1E $10.38B
2030Q2E $11.65B
2030Q3E $13.03B
2030Q4E $14.55B
2031Q1E $16.22B
2031Q2E $18.05B

Assumptions & reasoning

  • SpaceX does not break out Grok. There is no line in the segment disclosure that corresponds to this vertical, so it carries zero across every reported quarter and starts from nothing in the projection, like Space AI and Developer Platform.
  • The $0.55B starting run rate is not new revenue. It is the capacity Grok already consumes, moved here out of Terrestrial AI's utilisation - fifteen points of 1,800 MW at $2.03M. Reported June-quarter revenue is unchanged; only its character is.
  • Market x share is a landlord's model turned inside out. Terrestrial AI prices the building; this prices the tenant. Both are guesses about the same megawatts, which is why one of them had to give up fifteen points of utilisation.
  • The pool growth rate is worth more than the share. Ten percent of a pool compounding at 10% a quarter beats a quarter of one compounding at 5%, and both beat half of a pool that stops - so a reader who wants to argue with this line should move the build rate, not the share.
  • Capex at 8% terminal is software economics, and it is the assumption most likely to be wrong: if serving Grok needs megawatts SpaceX would otherwise lease, the cost of this line is Terrestrial AI's revenue rather than its own capex.
SPCX model map

Explore another vertical