← SPCX forward model

SPCX · Forward model · Model layer · Elon case

What has to happen in Model layer

Model as of

This page changes Model layer inside the complete SPCX model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.

SPCX forward model
Horizon
Consolidated fair value $882.19 all other verticals held in this portfolio case
Final-quarter revenue $36.13B 16% of company revenue
Explicit segment contribution $57.42B EBITDA less segment capex, before corporate items

Musk's own stated targets, taken at face value and translated into per-vertical growth: Starlink 10x on V3 bandwidth, Terrestrial AI at 10 GW and $30-50 a watt, Starlink Mobile at hundreds of millions of devices, Starship at a flight a day, and orbital compute scaling toward a million satellites. Two legs have no Musk post behind them and are ours. Developer Platform is our extension of the announced Cursor purchase and the Origin launch - Origin displaces GitHub outright and agent-driven seats keep compounding, which gets the line to roughly $31B a year against Cursor's $4B run rate today. Model layer is pushed to a 60% terminal share of the pool: Grok does not just compete with Anthropic and OpenAI, it becomes the default, worth about $36B a quarter by 2031 Q2 against $0.55B today. Note what the case does NOT reach: his $100B ARR by end-2026 needs a step-change no driver here produces off a $7.81B quarter, and $1T by 2030 sits above even this case. And note what the 60% share costs to believe - it is a bigger business than every megawatt SpaceX leases to everyone else, which is the arithmetic the case has to answer.

Model layer

Basis quarter$0
Final quarter$36.13B
Final revenue mix16%

Grok sold as a model rather than as a megawatt: tokens, seats and API calls, competing with Anthropic and OpenAI for a pool that booked a combined $18.3B in the June quarter. Modelled as market x share, because share is the only quantity the argument for this line is ever made in - and the finding is that the pool's growth rate matters more than the share does.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $0 Estimated
2025 Q4 $0 Estimated
2026 Q1 $0 Estimated
2026 Q2 $0 Reported
Grok API and token revenueGrok consumer and enterprise subscriptions
Capacity energised 18850 $M of market at the basis quarter $18,850M a quarter: Anthropic $11.6B plus OpenAI $6.7B plus Grok $0.55B. Press-reported, none of it audited.
Capacity added 1131 $M of market/qtr changing +6.0% per quarter $1,131M added in the first quarter, which is 6% of the pool - the rate the whole line is most sensitive to.
Utilisation 3% gliding toward 18% Share of the pool, not utilisation: Grok's $0.55B against $18.85B is 2.9% at the June quarter.
Revenue per $M of market $1.00M/qtr drifting 0.0% per quarter $1M per unit, because the unit IS $1M of quarterly market. This input only rescales the pool.
Model layer

Latest: $36.13B (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2025Q1 $0.00
2025Q2 $0.00
2025Q3 $0.00
2025Q4 $0.00
2026Q1 $0.00
2026Q2 $0.00
2026Q3E $894M
2026Q4E $1.30B
2027Q1E $1.77B
2027Q2E $2.31B
2027Q3E $2.94B
2027Q4E $3.67B
2028Q1E $4.50B
2028Q2E $5.46B
2028Q3E $6.56B
2028Q4E $7.83B
2029Q1E $9.28B
2029Q2E $10.93B
2029Q3E $12.83B
2029Q4E $15.00B
2030Q1E $17.47B
2030Q2E $20.29B
2030Q3E $23.51B
2030Q4E $27.18B
2031Q1E $31.37B
2031Q2E $36.13B

Assumptions & reasoning

  • SpaceX does not break out Grok. There is no line in the segment disclosure that corresponds to this vertical, so it carries zero across every reported quarter and starts from nothing in the projection, like Space AI and Developer Platform.
  • The $0.55B starting run rate is not new revenue. It is the capacity Grok already consumes, moved here out of Terrestrial AI's utilisation - fifteen points of 1,800 MW at $2.03M. Reported June-quarter revenue is unchanged; only its character is.
  • Market x share is a landlord's model turned inside out. Terrestrial AI prices the building; this prices the tenant. Both are guesses about the same megawatts, which is why one of them had to give up fifteen points of utilisation.
  • The pool growth rate is worth more than the share. Ten percent of a pool compounding at 10% a quarter beats a quarter of one compounding at 5%, and both beat half of a pool that stops - so a reader who wants to argue with this line should move the build rate, not the share.
  • Capex at 8% terminal is software economics, and it is the assumption most likely to be wrong: if serving Grok needs megawatts SpaceX would otherwise lease, the cost of this line is Terrestrial AI's revenue rather than its own capex.
SPCX model map

Explore another vertical