← Grab Holdings Limited

GRAB · Forward model · Oey 2028 case

The Oey 2028 case, 20 quarters out

Each segment is projected from its own operating driver, rolled up into consolidated cash flow, and discounted back to a fair value per share. The assumptions below are editable — change them and every number on this page moves with them.

Grab's segment disclosure carries this model further than most. Every quarter it publishes Deliveries, Mobility, Financial Services and Others revenue, and those four lines sum to consolidated revenue with zero residual in each of the six quarters from 2025 Q1 to 2026 Q2 - no segment here is derived by subtraction, and no split has been invented. Deliveries and Mobility also publish GMV and Segment Adjusted EBITDA, so both On-Demand verticals run on a disclosed volume times a disclosed monetisation rate: units are millions of dollars of GMV and price per unit is revenue per $1m of GMV. Financial Services cannot be modelled that way. Its perimeter changed twice inside the window - Superbank consolidated in June 2026, Stash from Q3 2026 - the loan-portfolio metric switched from net to gross between the Q3 2025 and Q1 2026 releases, and revenue per dollar of loan book fell from 12.0% to 5.8% as the book outgrew the revenue. It gets a growth driver with the $2,318m book recorded as an observation. What this model calls EBITDA is Grab's Adjusted EBITDA exactly: the four Segment Adjusted EBITDA lines less the single unallocated regional corporate cost line, which reproduces the reported $168m in the June quarter ($96m + $191m - $15m - $0m - $104m). Read the exit multiple against that, and read it knowing Adjusted EBITDA adds back $62m of quarterly share-based compensation - roughly $250m a year of real dilution this model never charges, on a share count held flat even though Grab is buying stock back. Two further boundaries. Net cash is $2,887m, not the company-defined $5.4bn of net cash liquidity: $2,513m of that funds bank customer deposits, which are a liability to depositors rather than shareholder cash, and using the company figure would add about $0.62 a share. Capex is the broader $49m from the Adjusted Free Cash Flow reconciliation, not the $28m of property and intangibles in the cash flow statement, and Grab publishes no capex by segment, so the group rate of 4.9% of revenue is applied to the three real verticals and none to Others. foodpanda Taiwan appears only as a $600m cash outflow in 2026 Q4: the price is disclosed and the revenue is not, so it must not become a vertical. Autonomous vehicles are already inside Mobility GMV and get no line either. And the reported profit is not an operating result - $235m of it is $19m of operating profit plus $171m of net finance income containing a one-time $307m Superbank remeasurement gain and a $43m tax credit - which is why the exit is on revenue and why no EPS consensus comparison appears anywhere in this model.

Management's own published destination: $1.5bn of Adjusted EBITDA in 2028 on a 20% 2025-2028 revenue CAGR. From FY2025's $3,370m that implies about $5.82bn of FY2028 revenue and a roughly 25.8% Adjusted EBITDA margin against 16.9% in the basis quarter. These deltas reach $5.89bn and $1.51bn, so the case is honest arithmetic rather than a headline. Two things it does not achieve. The target was set on 11 February 2026 and was not repeated on the Q2 2026 call in either of two independent transcripts. And the 80% conversion attached to it is conversion of a company-defined Adjusted Free Cash Flow that adds back loan-book growth, not of free cash flow as this model computes it. Fair value $5.22.

GRAB REVENUE MODEL

Latest: $2.40B (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2025Q1 $773M
2025Q2 $819M
2025Q3 $873M
2025Q4 $906M
2026Q1 $955M
2026Q2 $997M
2026Q3E $1.05B
2026Q4E $1.10B
2027Q1E $1.15B
2027Q2E $1.20B
2027Q3E $1.26B
2027Q4E $1.32B
2028Q1E $1.38B
2028Q2E $1.44B
2028Q3E $1.50B
2028Q4E $1.57B
2029Q1E $1.64B
2029Q2E $1.71B
2029Q3E $1.79B
2029Q4E $1.86B
2030Q1E $1.94B
2030Q2E $2.03B
2030Q3E $2.11B
2030Q4E $2.21B
2031Q1E $2.30B
2031Q2E $2.40B

What drives each segment

Deliveries

Units × price
Basis quarter$531M
Final quarter$1.36B
Implied CAGR+21%
Share of revenue, final quarter57%
PV of segment cash flow$3.13B

Food, grocery and parcel delivery, the Jaya Grocer and Everrise supermarkets, and the GrabAds advertising sold against the marketplace. $531m of revenue in the basis quarter, 53% of the group, on $4,249m of GMV. Both halves are disclosed every quarter, so the driver is GMV in dollars times revenue per dollar of GMV. The take rate has held between 12.32% and 13.26% for six quarters while advertising has grown into it.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $465M Reported
2025 Q4 $481M Reported
2026 Q1 $510M Reported
2026 Q2 $531M Reported
Food deliveryGrocery and mart deliveryParcel deliveryJaya Grocer and Everrise offline storesGrabAds advertising
Units 4249/qtr growing +4.5% per quarter Deliveries GMV, $4,249M in the June quarter. Units here are millions of dollars of GMV, disclosed every quarter.
Price per unit $124971 drifting +0.2% per quarter Revenue per $1M of GMV: a 12.497% take rate, inside the 12.32%-13.26% band held for six quarters.
Deliveries

Latest: $1.36B (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2025Q1 $415M
2025Q2 $439M
2025Q3 $465M
2025Q4 $481M
2026Q1 $510M
2026Q2 $531M
2026Q3E $557M
2026Q4E $584M
2027Q1E $613M
2027Q2E $643M
2027Q3E $674M
2027Q4E $706M
2028Q1E $740M
2028Q2E $776M
2028Q3E $813M
2028Q4E $852M
2029Q1E $893M
2029Q2E $936M
2029Q3E $980M
2029Q4E $1.03B
2030Q1E $1.08B
2030Q2E $1.13B
2030Q3E $1.18B
2030Q4E $1.24B
2031Q1E $1.30B
2031Q2E $1.36B

Assumptions & reasoning

  • Segment Adjusted EBITDA of $96m on $531m of revenue is stated before regional corporate costs, which Grab explicitly does not attribute to any segment. Charging them here as well would double-count; the corporate line is carried once at group level.
  • Deliveries Segment Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of GMV was 2.3% in the basis quarter, up 45bps YoY from 1.8%. That is the cleanest margin trend in the whole disclosure, and it is what the terminal margin of 26% of revenue is built on.
  • GrabAds is named as a driver of both revenue and margin but has not been sized since Q2 2025, when the release disclosed an annualized run-rate of $236m. Advertising is therefore not a sub-line here; it sits inside the take rate.
  • foodpanda Taiwan closes in H2 2026 into this segment and would be Grab's first market outside Southeast Asia. Grab has disclosed the $600m price and nothing about the revenue, so it appears only as a corporate capital programme and adds no revenue anywhere in this model.

Mobility

Units × price
Basis quarter$331M
Final quarter$676M
Implied CAGR+15%
Share of revenue, final quarter28%
PV of segment cash flow$4.42B

Ride-hailing and taxi across eight countries, plus GrabRentals and the GrabCab fleet. The profit engine and the slowest grower: $331m of revenue and $191m of Segment Adjusted EBITDA, a 57.7% margin on revenue and 8.6% of GMV. Same disclosure as Deliveries, so the driver is GMV times take rate - but here the take rate is falling, from 15.63% to 14.95% over six quarters, and revenue fell sequentially in the basis quarter for the first time.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $317M Reported
2025 Q4 $325M Reported
2026 Q1 $337M Reported
2026 Q2 $331M Reported
Ride-hailingTaxi and GrabCabGrabRentalsAdvertising attributed to Mobility
Units 2214/qtr growing +3.5% per quarter Mobility GMV, $2,214M in the June quarter, down $9m sequentially. Units are millions of dollars of GMV.
Price per unit $149503 drifting -0.1% per quarter Revenue per $1M of GMV: a 14.950% take rate, the lowest in the six-quarter series.
Mobility

Latest: $676M (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2025Q1 $282M
2025Q2 $295M
2025Q3 $317M
2025Q4 $325M
2026Q1 $337M
2026Q2 $331M
2026Q3E $343M
2026Q4E $355M
2027Q1E $368M
2027Q2E $381M
2027Q3E $395M
2027Q4E $409M
2028Q1E $424M
2028Q2E $439M
2028Q3E $455M
2028Q4E $472M
2029Q1E $489M
2029Q2E $507M
2029Q3E $525M
2029Q4E $545M
2030Q1E $565M
2030Q2E $585M
2030Q3E $607M
2030Q4E $629M
2031Q1E $652M
2031Q2E $676M

Assumptions & reasoning

  • Autonomous vehicles are deliberately not a vertical. Grab discloses no AV revenue, and an autonomous trip that replaces a human one already sits inside this GMV, so a separate line would count the same trip twice. Anthony Tan said on the Q2 2026 call that Grab aims to launch its first revenue-generating point-to-point AV service in Punggol, Singapore in Q4 2026; it lives in the margin glide and the scenarios, nowhere else.
  • The Q2 2026 sequential decline is small in dollars - $6m of revenue on $9m of GMV - but it is the first in the series and it arrives with the lowest take rate in the series. The model does not smooth it over: the price drift stays negative for years.
  • Grab does not publish Mobility trips, fares or Mobility MTUs as levels, only YoY growth rates, so GMV is the only per-segment volume that exists as a number. Transactions grew 28% YoY against GMV's 18%, which is the affordability push in one comparison.
  • In April 2026 Grab was awarded the inaugural International Cross-border Ride-hail Service Operator Licence between Singapore and Johor. No revenue has been attached to it by the company and none is assumed here.

Financial Services

Growth path
Basis quarter$134M
Final quarter$364M
Implied CAGR+22%
Share of revenue, final quarter15%
PV of segment cash flow$262M

GrabFin plus three Digibanks - GXS Bank (Singapore), GXBank (Malaysia) and Superbank (Indonesia) - lending into the Grab ecosystem. $134m of revenue, +59% YoY, and still $(15)m at the segment line. The gross loan portfolio reached $2,318m and customer deposits $2.5bn. This is the fastest-growing and only loss-making segment, and the one whose perimeter keeps changing, so it runs on a growth driver rather than a volume-times-price one.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $90M Reported
2025 Q4 $99M Reported
2026 Q1 $107M Reported
2026 Q2 $134M Reported
Lending through GrabFin and the DigibanksDigital banking deposits and net interest incomePaymentsInsurance
Sequential growth +8.0%/qtr decaying toward +3.0% The six-quarter QoQ range was 7%-12% before Superbank. 8% holds the trend without pricing the unquantified Stash step.
Financial Services

Latest: $364M (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2025Q1 $75M
2025Q2 $84M
2025Q3 $90M
2025Q4 $99M
2026Q1 $107M
2026Q2 $134M
2026Q3E $145M
2026Q4E $156M
2027Q1E $167M
2027Q2E $178M
2027Q3E $189M
2027Q4E $200M
2028Q1E $211M
2028Q2E $222M
2028Q3E $234M
2028Q4E $245M
2029Q1E $256M
2029Q2E $267M
2029Q3E $279M
2029Q4E $291M
2030Q1E $302M
2030Q2E $314M
2030Q3E $326M
2030Q4E $339M
2031Q1E $351M
2031Q2E $364M

Assumptions & reasoning

  • No unit driver is defensible here. Revenue per dollar of gross loan portfolio collapsed from 12.0% in Q1 2025 to 5.78% in the basis quarter as the book outgrew the revenue, and the metric itself changed basis mid-window: the Q2 and Q3 2025 releases report a net loan portfolio, the Q1 and Q2 2026 releases a gross one with restated comparatives. The $2,318m book is recorded as an observation, not a multiplier.
  • The perimeter moved twice inside the window. Superbank consolidated from June 2026, so only one month of it is in the basis quarter, and Stash closed on 1 July 2026 and consolidates only from Q3 2026. Neither contribution has been sized by the company, so the Q3 2026 step is not inside the 8% growth rate; it is an unpriced upside flagged here instead of hidden.
  • Grab publishes no revenue split between lending, payments, insurance and banking net interest income, and none has been created here. The segment is modelled as one line because that is the only way it is reported.
  • Credit cost, not revenue, is what stands between this segment and its guided H2 2026 breakeven. Net impairment losses on financial assets more than doubled YoY to $72m on Digibank expected credit losses, plus a separate $15m day-one expected credit loss on the acquired Superbank portfolio that Adjusted EBITDA adds back.
  • Loan-book growth is why Grab's Adjusted Free Cash Flow and this site's free cash flow diverge: the company adds back $177m of loan-receivable growth in the quarter and this model does not model the book at all. The gap widens as the book grows.

Others

Growth path
Basis quarter$1M
Final quarter$1M
Implied CAGR+1%
Share of revenue, final quarter0%
PV of segment cash flow$940810

Everything Grab does not put in the three named segments. $1m of revenue in each of the last six quarters and Segment Adjusted EBITDA reported as less than $1m in absolute terms. It exists in this model only so that the four verticals sum to reported consolidated revenue with no residual in any quarter.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $1M Reported
2025 Q4 $1M Reported
2026 Q1 $1M Reported
2026 Q2 $1M Reported
Unallocated other services
Sequential growth +0.0%/qtr decaying toward +0.0% $1m for six straight quarters. Any growth rate on a $1m base is noise, so the line is held flat.
Others

Latest: $1M (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2025Q1 $1M
2025Q2 $1M
2025Q3 $1M
2025Q4 $1M
2026Q1 $1M
2026Q2 $1M
2026Q3E $1M
2026Q4E $1M
2027Q1E $1M
2027Q2E $1M
2027Q3E $1M
2027Q4E $1M
2028Q1E $1M
2028Q2E $1M
2028Q3E $1M
2028Q4E $1M
2029Q1E $1M
2029Q2E $1M
2029Q3E $1M
2029Q4E $1M
2030Q1E $1M
2030Q2E $1M
2030Q3E $1M
2030Q4E $1M
2031Q1E $1M
2031Q2E $1M

Assumptions & reasoning

  • FY2025 Others revenue was $4m against FY2024's $4m, and Grab has never described what sits inside it. Zero margin and zero capex are the honest readings of a segment whose Adjusted EBITDA is disclosed only as an amount smaller than $1m.
  • Assigning the group capex rate to a $1m line would put more capex through it than it earns, so this vertical carries none. Every dollar of group capex is charged to the three real segments instead.
Scenarios

Where each case comes from

Bear case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bear column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Bull case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bull column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Oey 2028 case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Oey 2028 column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Valuation

From cash flow to fair value

Present value of free cash flow, 20 quarters$3.40B
Terminal-year revenue$9.02B
Terminal-year EBITDA$2.47B
Exit multiple, on revenue2.8x
Terminal value$25.25B
Discounted at 11.0% a year, terminal value becomes$14.98B
Enterprise value$18.39B
Net cash$2.89B
Equity value$21.27B
Shares4.08B
Fair value per share$5.22
Against the current price of $3.59+45%

An emerging-market consumer platform on a 1.9% IFRS operating margin with three currencies of translation drag is not a 9% compounder, so the discount rate is 11%. The exit is on revenue because Grab has no P/E path: the basis quarter's $235m of profit is $19m of operating profit plus $171m of net finance income containing a one-time $307m Superbank gain, plus a $43m tax credit. On deposit-adjusted EV of $11,961m the tape is 3.21x TTM revenue of $3,731m, so exiting at 2.5x on a slower terminal year is a mild de-rate. On the company's own $5.4bn net cash liquidity - which does not deduct $2,513m of bank customer deposits - the same tape reads 2.53x, and that difference is the single largest judgement in this valuation.

Read the other way round: at $3.59 the market is paying 1.6x terminal-year revenue, holding every other assumption on this page fixed. That is the number to argue about.

Capital programmes

Capex outside the verticals

Each vertical's capex is a share of its own revenue, which is the right shape for capacity that scales with sales. These are not that: fixed-size programmes with their own schedule that spend whether or not any segment grows. They are added on top, and they are why free cash flow dips in the years below.

foodpanda Taiwan acquisition

2026 Q4 → 2026 Q4
Programme total$600M
Cash out$600M/qtr

The $600m all-cash purchase of Delivery Hero's foodpanda Taiwan business, announced 23 March 2026 and guided to close by the end of 2026. It is charged once, in 2026 Q4, and adds no revenue anywhere: Grab has disclosed the price and nothing about the revenue, GMV or EBITDA it buys.

Quarter by quarter

The projected path

Quarter DeliveriesMobilityFinancial ServicesOthers Revenue YoY EBITDA Capex FCF R40 PV of FCF
2026 Q3E $557M$343M$145M$1M $1.05B +20% $243M $50M $143M +34 $140M
2026 Q4E $584M$355M$156M$1M $1.10B +21% $259M $652M -$393M -15 -$373M
2027 Q1E $613M$368M$167M$1M $1.15B +20% $275M $53M $165M +35 $152M
2027 Q2E $643M$381M$178M$1M $1.20B +21% $292M $55M $176M +35 $159M
2027 Q3E $674M$395M$189M$1M $1.26B +20% $310M $57M $188M +35 $165M
2027 Q4E $706M$409M$200M$1M $1.32B +20% $328M $59M $200M +35 $171M
2028 Q1E $740M$424M$211M$1M $1.38B +20% $347M $61M $213M +35 $177M
2028 Q2E $776M$439M$222M$1M $1.44B +20% $367M $63M $226M +35 $183M
2028 Q3E $813M$455M$234M$1M $1.50B +19% $387M $65M $239M +35 $189M
2028 Q4E $852M$472M$245M$1M $1.57B +19% $408M $68M $253M +35 $195M
2029 Q1E $893M$489M$256M$1M $1.64B +19% $429M $70M $267M +35 $200M
2029 Q2E $936M$507M$267M$1M $1.71B +19% $452M $73M $282M +35 $206M
2029 Q3E $980M$525M$279M$1M $1.79B +19% $475M $75M $297M +35 $211M
2029 Q4E $1.03B$545M$291M$1M $1.86B +19% $499M $78M $312M +35 $217M
2030 Q1E $1.08B$565M$302M$1M $1.94B +19% $523M $81M $328M +35 $222M
2030 Q2E $1.13B$585M$314M$1M $2.03B +19% $549M $84M $345M +36 $227M
2030 Q3E $1.18B$607M$326M$1M $2.11B +18% $575M $88M $362M +36 $232M
2030 Q4E $1.24B$629M$339M$1M $2.21B +18% $603M $91M $380M +36 $238M
2031 Q1E $1.30B$652M$351M$1M $2.30B +18% $631M $95M $398M +36 $243M
2031 Q2E $1.36B$676M$364M$1M $2.40B +18% $660M $98M $418M +36 $248M

Every row is projected. A year-over-year change is shown only where the quarter it compares against exists — an em dash means there is no comparable quarter, not a flat year.

Track record

Model revisions

Assumptions are marked to reality as each quarter prints. Every change is appended here, with the fair value the model produced at the time, so the model's own history stays visible.

DateChangedFair value thenNote
2026-08-27 all $4.42 First publication, on the 2026 Q2 basis quarter. Four disclosed segments that reconcile to consolidated revenue to the dollar in all six quarters; Deliveries and Mobility on disclosed GMV times disclosed take rate, Financial Services and Others on growth. foodpanda Taiwan is a corporate capital programme, not a vertical.