← Xiaomi Corporation

XIACY · Forward model

Revenue by vertical, 20 quarters out

Each segment is projected from its own operating driver, rolled up into consolidated cash flow, and discounted back to a fair value per share. The assumptions below are editable — change them and every number on this page moves with them.

Four decisions decide how this model reads. First, the verticals are Xiaomi's five disclosed revenue lines and nothing finer: smartphones, IoT and lifestyle products, internet services, smart EV with AI and other new initiatives, and the other-related residual. Xiaomi publishes a gross margin for each of the first four and an operating result for the fifth segment only, so revenue and gross margin are disclosed and every EBITDA margin here is ours - an allocation of the RMB19.4bn of quarterly operating expense the company reports only at group level, with an assumed depreciation add-back. Nothing below gross profit is split by the company. Second, the currency. Xiaomi reports in renminbi and publishes no US dollar convenience translation, so every figure here is converted at the rate implied by each quarter's own stored consolidated revenue on this site - 7.2332 for the June 2025 quarter through 6.8046 for June 2026. That is deliberate: it makes the five verticals sum to the reported consolidated dollar figure to within one dollar in all five quarters, and it means the growth rates carry the exchange rate with them. Revenue fell 6.1% in renminbi and 0.1% in dollars over the year to June 2026. Third, what is estimated. The June 2026 quarter is disclosed in full and is the basis. Four earlier figures are ours: the December 2025 smartphone line, which is the full-year total less the other three quarters; the June 2025 internet services line, derived from the disclosed -0.6% year-over-year change; the September 2025 smart EV segment, which is the full-year total less the other three quarters; and every other-related quarter except June 2026, which is the residual after the four named lines. Those quarters are flagged, and a flag on any vertical flags the consolidated quarter with it. Fourth, three driver kinds rather than one. Smartphones and vehicles are modelled as units times price because Xiaomi discloses both halves every quarter and because in the June 2026 quarter they moved hard in opposite directions - a single growth rate would have hidden the whole story. Internet services is modelled as users times ARPU because monthly active users are disclosed; the ARPU itself is our division of two reported numbers and is not a company metric. IoT and the residual use growth rates because no unit, price or user figure exists for them in the public record. Two figures are softer than they look. Net cash of -$301m counts only the RMB37,252.4m of cash and cash equivalents disclosed at 30 June 2026 against RMB39.3bn of total borrowings; it excludes short-term investments the results announcement does not detail, so it understates liquidity - and at $0.06 per ADS either way it changes nothing. And the share count of 5,301,755,400 is the diluted weighted average of 26,508,777 thousand ordinary shares divided by five, because one XIACY ADR is five ordinary shares. The $17.70 price is a build-time snapshot and the page resolves the live quote instead.

XIACY REVENUE MODEL

Latest: $23.50B (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2025Q2 $16.03B
2025Q3 $15.81B
2025Q4 $16.49B
2026Q1 $14.32B
2026Q2 $16.01B
2026Q3E $16.37B
2026Q4E $16.74B
2027Q1E $17.12B
2027Q2E $17.51B
2027Q3E $17.91B
2027Q4E $18.33B
2028Q1E $18.76B
2028Q2E $19.21B
2028Q3E $19.67B
2028Q4E $20.15B
2029Q1E $20.65B
2029Q2E $21.17B
2029Q3E $21.72B
2029Q4E $22.28B
2030Q1E $22.87B
2030Q2E $23.00B
2030Q3E $23.13B
2030Q4E $23.25B
2031Q1E $23.37B
2031Q2E $23.50B

What drives each segment

Smartphones

Units × price
Basis quarter$6.19B
Final quarter$7.32B
Implied CAGR+3%
Share of revenue, final quarter31%
PV of segment cash flow$2.73B

The acquisition engine, deliberately shrinking. Xiaomi shipped 31.2 million phones in the June quarter, down 26.5% year over year, while pushing average selling price to a record RMB1,351 - up 25.9%. The strategy is working on its own terms: phones at RMB3,000 or more reached 32.1% of Chinese mainland units, a record. It produced an 8.5% gross margin anyway, because memory cost more than the price increase recovered. This line is not where the profit is and has not been for years. It is where the 766 million monthly active users come from, which is where the profit is.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $6.43B Reported
2025 Q4 $6.25B Estimated
2026 Q1 $6.40B Reported
2026 Q2 $6.19B Reported
Chinese mainland smartphonesOverseas smartphones
Units 31200000/qtr growing +0.5% per quarter 31.2m shipped in the June quarter, down 26.5% YoY - the company calls it actively adjusting shipment cadence.
Price per unit $198 drifting +0.5% per quarter $198.30 is RMB1,349 at 6.8046, the ASP implied by RMB42.1bn over 31.2m units. Disclosed ASP is RMB1,351.
Smartphones

Latest: $7.32B (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2025Q2 $6.29B
2025Q3 $6.43B
2025Q4 $6.25B
2026Q1 $6.40B
2026Q2 $6.19B
2026Q3E $6.25B
2026Q4E $6.31B
2027Q1E $6.37B
2027Q2E $6.43B
2027Q3E $6.49B
2027Q4E $6.54B
2028Q1E $6.60B
2028Q2E $6.66B
2028Q3E $6.71B
2028Q4E $6.77B
2029Q1E $6.82B
2029Q2E $6.88B
2029Q3E $6.93B
2029Q4E $6.99B
2030Q1E $7.05B
2030Q2E $7.10B
2030Q3E $7.16B
2030Q4E $7.21B
2031Q1E $7.27B
2031Q2E $7.32B

Assumptions & reasoning

  • Gross margin of 8.5% is disclosed. The 1.0% EBITDA margin is ours: it loads this line with a share of the RMB19.4bn of quarterly operating expense that Xiaomi reports only for the group, and adds back an assumed share of depreciation. Xiaomi publishes no operating profit for the smartphone line.
  • The terminal 6% assumes memory prices normalise and the premium mix built during the squeeze survives it. Both halves have to be true. If memory stays where it is and the mix reverts, this line runs closer to 2% and the model loses roughly a tenth of its value.
  • Units and price are modelled independently, which is the point: the June quarter is the first in years where they moved hard in opposite directions, and a single growth rate would have hidden it entirely.

IoT and lifestyle products

Growth path
Basis quarter$4.60B
Final quarter$5.86B
Implied CAGR+5%
Share of revenue, final quarter25%
PV of segment cash flow$7.81B

The lock-in engine. RMB31.3 billion in the June quarter at a 20.1% gross margin, with 1.16 billion connected devices on the platform, up 17.4%. Revenue fell 19.2% year over year as Chinese appliance subsidies faded and overseas growth only partly offset it, which is what makes this the most cyclical line in the company. Its job is not margin. Its job is to raise the number of Xiaomi devices in a household, because a user with five is a different user from one with one.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $3.86B Reported
2025 Q4 $3.47B Reported
2026 Q1 $3.57B Reported
2026 Q2 $4.60B Reported
Smart home appliancesTablets and laptopsWearables and TWS earbudsOther lifestyle products
Sequential growth +1.5%/qtr decaying toward +1.0% 1.5% a quarter. Overseas double-digit growth against a Chinese subsidy fade that has already done its worst.
IoT and lifestyle products

Latest: $5.86B (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2025Q2 $5.35B
2025Q3 $3.86B
2025Q4 $3.47B
2026Q1 $3.57B
2026Q2 $4.60B
2026Q3E $4.67B
2026Q4E $4.74B
2027Q1E $4.80B
2027Q2E $4.87B
2027Q3E $4.93B
2027Q4E $5.00B
2028Q1E $5.06B
2028Q2E $5.12B
2028Q3E $5.19B
2028Q4E $5.25B
2029Q1E $5.31B
2029Q2E $5.37B
2029Q3E $5.43B
2029Q4E $5.49B
2030Q1E $5.55B
2030Q2E $5.62B
2030Q3E $5.68B
2030Q4E $5.74B
2031Q1E $5.80B
2031Q2E $5.86B

Assumptions & reasoning

  • A growth driver is the honest choice here and not the lazy one. Xiaomi discloses connected device count and revenue but no unit shipments, no average price and no category split with economics attached, so a unit driver would need a price per device that does not exist in the public record.
  • This line is seasonal - air conditioners peak in the June quarter, which is most of why revenue rose 26.7% sequentially while falling 19.2% year over year. The projection is smooth and the history is not. Read the annual totals rather than individual projected quarters.
  • The 20.1% gross margin is disclosed; the 10% EBITDA margin is our allocation of group operating expense and is the input most likely to be wrong in either direction.

Internet services

Subscribers × ARPU
Basis quarter$1.32B
Final quarter$1.81B
Implied CAGR+6%
Share of revenue, final quarter8%
PV of segment cash flow$11.79B

The profit engine, and the reason the hardware margin can be as bad as it is. RMB9.0 billion of revenue in the June quarter at a 76.8% gross margin - 8.3% of revenue and, on gross profit, roughly 40% of everything the Smartphone x AIoT segment contributed. It scales with monthly active users, which reached a record 766.5 million, and it is monetised mostly through advertising, which grew 4.8%. This is the classic software-on-hardware conversion, and it is what funds the R&D that the other four verticals spend.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $1.31B Reported
2025 Q4 $1.40B Reported
2026 Q1 $1.37B Reported
2026 Q2 $1.32B Reported
AdvertisingGamingOther value-added servicesOverseas internet services
Subscribers 766.5M 38.3% of a 2.00B addressable base 766.5m global monthly active users at 30 June 2026, a record, up 4.8% YoY. Disclosed in the results announcement.
Addressable subscribers 2.00B the S-curve ceiling 2.0bn reachable devices - ours, not disclosed. Xiaomi reports 1.16bn connected IoT devices on top of the phone base.
Net adds 0/qtr ramping toward 0/qtr, throttled as the base approaches the TAM
Net-add ceiling 0/qtr what supply can deliver at full rate
ARPU $0.58/mo drifting +0.5% per quarter, floor $0.40 $0.575 a month is RMB3.91, from RMB9.0bn over 766.5m users over three months. Derived from two disclosed figures.
Non-subscriber revenue $0/qtr growing +0.0% per quarter Zero. Every dollar of this line is modelled through users and ARPU; nothing sits outside it.
Internet services

Latest: $1.81B (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2025Q2 $1.25B
2025Q3 $1.31B
2025Q4 $1.40B
2026Q1 $1.37B
2026Q2 $1.32B
2026Q3E $1.35B
2026Q4E $1.37B
2027Q1E $1.39B
2027Q2E $1.42B
2027Q3E $1.44B
2027Q4E $1.47B
2028Q1E $1.49B
2028Q2E $1.51B
2028Q3E $1.54B
2028Q4E $1.56B
2029Q1E $1.59B
2029Q2E $1.61B
2029Q3E $1.63B
2029Q4E $1.66B
2030Q1E $1.68B
2030Q2E $1.71B
2030Q3E $1.73B
2030Q4E $1.76B
2031Q1E $1.78B
2031Q2E $1.81B

Assumptions & reasoning

  • ARPU is derived, not disclosed. Xiaomi publishes internet services revenue and monthly active users separately and never divides them, so the $0.575 figure is our arithmetic on two reported numbers rather than a company metric.
  • The 76.8% gross margin is disclosed and is the highest in the company by a wide margin. The 50% EBITDA margin is ours - advertising carries real sales and platform cost that Xiaomi reports only at group level.
  • Terminal capex intensity rises rather than falls, which is deliberate: serving AI features into the OS costs compute that advertising in 2026 did not need.
  • Attach mode is used rather than net adds because the constraint is how much of an existing device base ever becomes active, not how fast Xiaomi can add users.

Smart EV, AI and other new initiatives

Units × price
Basis quarter$3.66B
Final quarter$8.17B
Implied CAGR+17%
Share of revenue, final quarter35%
PV of segment cash flow-$719M

The second engine, and the only vertical here with a shape rather than a rate. RMB24.9 billion in the June quarter, up 17.1%, at a 19.2% gross margin - a car business whose gross margin is now more than double the phone business's. Xiaomi delivered 104,199 vehicles, up 28.2%, into a Chinese passenger-vehicle market that shrank 22%. It still lost RMB2.6 billion from operations, because the quarter carried the run-up to the SkyNomad extended-range SUV line launching in September. The AI tail inside this segment - MiMo, priced by API token - turned over about RMB1.0 billion and is the first time it has been visible at all.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $4.07B Estimated
2025 Q4 $5.25B Reported
2026 Q1 $2.87B Reported
2026 Q2 $3.66B Reported
Smart EV (SU7, YU7, SkyNomad)AI and MiMo modelsOther new initiatives
Units 104199/qtr growing +6.0% per quarter 104,199 vehicles delivered in the June quarter, up 28.2% YoY, into a market that shrank 22%. Disclosed.
Price per unit $35118 drifting -0.5% per quarter $35,118 is segment revenue per vehicle delivered, not the car's own price - it carries the RMB1.0bn AI tail with it.
Smart EV, AI and other new initiatives

Latest: $8.17B (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2025Q2 $2.94B
2025Q3 $4.07B
2025Q4 $5.25B
2026Q1 $2.87B
2026Q2 $3.66B
2026Q3E $3.86B
2026Q4E $4.07B
2027Q1E $4.30B
2027Q2E $4.53B
2027Q3E $4.79B
2027Q4E $5.05B
2028Q1E $5.34B
2028Q2E $5.64B
2028Q3E $5.95B
2028Q4E $6.29B
2029Q1E $6.64B
2029Q2E $7.02B
2029Q3E $7.42B
2029Q4E $7.84B
2030Q1E $8.28B
2030Q2E $8.26B
2030Q3E $8.24B
2030Q4E $8.22B
2031Q1E $8.19B
2031Q2E $8.17B

Assumptions & reasoning

  • The unit price here is segment revenue divided by vehicles delivered, which is higher than the car's own average selling price because the segment also contains the AI and other-new-initiatives line. A reader moving the deliveries slider is moving the whole segment with it, and that is stated rather than hidden.
  • This is the one vertical where operating profit IS disclosed: the segment lost RMB2.6bn from operations in the June quarter, and earned RMB0.9bn across the whole of 2025. The -2.5% EBITDA margin is that loss with an assumed depreciation add-back, and the depreciation is ours.
  • Capex intensity of 9.2% comes from a disclosed figure: of RMB3,620.5m of group capital expenditure in the quarter, RMB2,382.6m was smart EV, AI and other new initiatives. It is the only vertical here whose capex is not an allocation.
  • The terminal 12% EBITDA margin is the largest single judgement in this model. It assumes Xiaomi reaches something like a mature volume carmaker's economics on a line that has been positive for exactly one year. Move it before anything else.

Other related businesses

Growth path
Basis quarter$238M
Final quarter$335M
Implied CAGR+7%
Share of revenue, final quarter1%
PV of segment cash flow-$72M

The residual inside Smartphone x AIoT - roughly RMB1.6 billion a quarter of accessories, repairs and other items Xiaomi reports as a line but never describes. It exists in this model so the five verticals sum to the reported consolidated revenue exactly, in every quarter, rather than approximately.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $140M Estimated
2025 Q4 $124M Estimated
2026 Q1 $107M Estimated
2026 Q2 $238M Reported
Other related businesses within Smartphone x AIoT
Sequential growth +2.0%/qtr decaying toward +1.5% 2% a quarter. It grew 16% YoY off a small base and Xiaomi says nothing about what drives it.
Other related businesses

Latest: $335M (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2025Q2 $194M
2025Q3 $140M
2025Q4 $124M
2026Q1 $107M
2026Q2 $238M
2026Q3E $243M
2026Q4E $248M
2027Q1E $253M
2027Q2E $257M
2027Q3E $262M
2027Q4E $267M
2028Q1E $271M
2028Q2E $276M
2028Q3E $281M
2028Q4E $286M
2029Q1E $290M
2029Q2E $295M
2029Q3E $300M
2029Q4E $305M
2030Q1E $310M
2030Q2E $315M
2030Q3E $320M
2030Q4E $325M
2031Q1E $330M
2031Q2E $335M

Assumptions & reasoning

  • Only the June 2026 quarter is a disclosed figure here, at RMB1.6bn. The four earlier quarters are the residual left when the four named lines are subtracted from reported consolidated revenue, and are flagged estimated for that reason.
  • Its economics are assumed outright. Xiaomi discloses neither a gross margin nor an operating result for this line, so both margin inputs are ours and the vertical is small enough that neither changes the answer.
  • It is carried as its own vertical rather than folded into another one so that no named segment absorbs a residual it did not earn.
Scenarios

Where each case comes from

Bear case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bear column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Base case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Base column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Bull case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bull column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Valuation

From cash flow to fair value

Present value of free cash flow, 20 quarters$14.22B
Terminal-year revenue$93.25B
Terminal-year EBITDA$10.17B
Exit multiple, on revenue1.6x
Terminal value$149.19B
Discounted at 12.0% a year, terminal value becomes$84.66B
Enterprise value$98.87B
Net cash-$301M
Equity value$98.57B
Diluted shares5.30B
Fair value per share$18.59
Against the current price of $17.64+5%

1.6x terminal revenue against roughly 1.5x enterprise value to trailing revenue today - $17.70 across 5.30bn ADS-equivalents, plus RMB2.0bn of net debt, over $62.6bn of trailing revenue. So the exit multiple assumes almost no re-rating, which is the conservative choice for a Hong Kong-listed company held through an over-the-counter ADR. The 12% discount rate is above the 10-11% used for US names on this site for the same reason. Move this slider before any other: it decides more of the answer than every operating assumption combined.

Read the other way round: at $17.64 the market is paying 1.5x terminal-year revenue, holding every other assumption on this page fixed. That is the number to argue about.

Quarter by quarter

The projected path

Quarter SmartphonesIoT and lifestyle productsInternet servicesSmart EV, AI and other new initiativesOther related businesses Revenue YoY EBITDA Capex FCF R40 PV of FCF
2026 Q3E $6.25B$4.67B$1.35B$3.86B$243M $16.37B +4% $971M $541M $352M +6 $343M
2026 Q4E $6.31B$4.74B$1.37B$4.07B$248M $16.74B +1% $1.08B $551M $435M +4 $411M
2027 Q1E $6.37B$4.80B$1.39B$4.30B$253M $17.12B +19% $1.19B $562M $514M +23 $472M
2027 Q2E $6.43B$4.87B$1.42B$4.53B$257M $17.51B +9% $1.29B $573M $591M +13 $527M
2027 Q3E $6.49B$4.93B$1.44B$4.79B$262M $17.91B +9% $1.40B $586M $664M +13 $576M
2027 Q4E $6.54B$5.00B$1.47B$5.05B$267M $18.33B +10% $1.49B $599M $735M +14 $620M
2028 Q1E $6.60B$5.06B$1.49B$5.34B$271M $18.76B +10% $1.59B $613M $803M +14 $659M
2028 Q2E $6.66B$5.12B$1.51B$5.64B$276M $19.21B +10% $1.69B $627M $870M +14 $693M
2028 Q3E $6.71B$5.19B$1.54B$5.95B$281M $19.67B +10% $1.78B $643M $935M +15 $724M
2028 Q4E $6.77B$5.25B$1.56B$6.29B$286M $20.15B +10% $1.88B $660M $998M +15 $752M
2029 Q1E $6.82B$5.31B$1.59B$6.64B$290M $20.65B +10% $1.97B $677M $1.06B +15 $777M
2029 Q2E $6.88B$5.37B$1.61B$7.02B$295M $21.17B +10% $2.06B $696M $1.12B +16 $799M
2029 Q3E $6.93B$5.43B$1.63B$7.42B$300M $21.72B +10% $2.16B $716M $1.18B +16 $818M
2029 Q4E $6.99B$5.49B$1.66B$7.84B$305M $22.28B +11% $2.25B $737M $1.24B +16 $836M
2030 Q1E $7.05B$5.55B$1.68B$8.28B$310M $22.87B +11% $2.35B $760M $1.30B +16 $852M
2030 Q2E $7.10B$5.62B$1.71B$8.26B$315M $23.00B +9% $2.41B $754M $1.36B +15 $862M
2030 Q3E $7.16B$5.68B$1.73B$8.24B$320M $23.13B +6% $2.46B $748M $1.41B +13 $870M
2030 Q4E $7.21B$5.74B$1.76B$8.22B$325M $23.25B +4% $2.52B $743M $1.46B +11 $874M
2031 Q1E $7.27B$5.80B$1.78B$8.19B$330M $23.37B +2% $2.57B $738M $1.50B +9 $876M
2031 Q2E $7.32B$5.86B$1.81B$8.17B$335M $23.50B +2% $2.62B $734M $1.54B +9 $875M

Every row is projected. A year-over-year change is shown only where the quarter it compares against exists — an em dash means there is no comparable quarter, not a flat year.

Track record

Model revisions

Assumptions are marked to reality as each quarter prints. Every change is appended here, with the fair value the model produced at the time, so the model's own history stays visible.

DateChangedFair value thenNote
2026-08-20 $18.59 First model. Five verticals on Xiaomi's five disclosed revenue lines, basis the June 2026 quarter, with units-times-price drivers on phones and vehicles and a users-times-ARPU driver on internet services.