← Chevron Corporation

CVX · Forward model · Kilby case

The Kilby case, 20 quarters out

Model as of

Each segment is projected from its own operating driver, rolled up into consolidated cash flow, and discounted back to a fair value per share. The assumptions below are editable — change them and every number on this page moves with them.

Five verticals, four reportable segment-by-geography lines plus All Other, which is the finest cut Chevron actually reports; no Permian, Gulf of America or Guyana split is attempted because none is disclosed. The five lines sum to reported Total Revenues and Other Income in all ten quarters, to the dollar, from 2024 Q1 to 2026 Q2. Ten quarters is the whole history available on this basis: the segment presentation carrying Total Revenues and Other Income begins with the 2025 filings, whose comparatives reach 2024 Q1, and earlier 10-Qs disclose segment revenue only before and after intersegment elimination. Three quarters are marked estimated - 2024 Q1, 2024 Q4 and 2025 Q4 - because they were obtained by subtracting a cumulative period from an annual or nine-month total; all three are independently confirmed by the FY2025 10-K quarterly table. Disclosed: volumes, throughput, realisations, capex, the 2026 capex range, the Q3 2026 buyback range and the 2030 objectives. Assumed and labelled as such: every forward price path, the terminal margins, the 9% discount rate and the 7.0x exit multiple. Segment EBITDA margins are computed against post-elimination revenue, so U.S. Upstream's derived 137.7% is an arithmetic artefact of intersegment transfers rather than profitability; the model caps it at 100% and credits the $2,114M difference to U.S. Downstream, which buys those barrels, so consolidated EBITDA still reconciles to the reported $22,766M. Project Kilby carries zero revenue because no capital cost, revenue schedule or first-power date has been disclosed anywhere. No Venezuela volume is modelled: the 10-Q states production and reserves there are not included in the company's results.

CVX forward model
Horizon
Fair value per share $186.49 −9% against $204.21
Terminal-year revenue $214.66B last four projected quarters
Enterprise value $394.43B $119.70B explicit + $274.74B terminal

Project Kilby is a 20-year power purchase agreement with Microsoft for about 2.67 gigawatts of behind-the-meter capacity in West Texas, at returns management described as mid-teens, with a final investment decision expected later this year. It is pre-FID, with no disclosed capital cost, no first-power date and no revenue in any filing, so this case adds no revenue to any vertical. What it changes is the exit multiple: 7.6x instead of 7.0x, a re-rating for a major that also sells power to the AI buildout. It does not add a barrel, a dollar of EBITDA before 2031, or any evidence that FID happens.

CVX REVENUE MODEL

Latest: $54.85B (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2024Q1 $48.72B
2024Q2 $51.18B
2024Q3 $50.67B
2024Q4 $52.23B
2025Q1 $47.61B
2025Q2 $44.82B
2025Q3 $49.73B
2025Q4 $46.87B
2026Q1 $48.61B
2026Q2 $70.06B
2026Q3E $63.82B
2026Q4E $58.21B
2027Q1E $57.58B
2027Q2E $56.51B
2027Q3E $54.74B
2027Q4E $52.20B
2028Q1E $53.37B
2028Q2E $53.66B
2028Q3E $52.91B
2028Q4E $51.13B
2029Q1E $52.78B
2029Q2E $53.46B
2029Q3E $53.00B
2029Q4E $51.42B
2030Q1E $53.24B
2030Q2E $54.04B
2030Q3E $53.66B
2030Q4E $52.14B
2031Q1E $54.01B
2031Q2E $54.85B
Scenarios

Where each case comes from

Bear case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bear column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Bull case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bull column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Kilby case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Kilby column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Valuation

From cash flow to fair value

The published model, discounted at 9.0% a year with an exit multiple of 7.6x on EBITDA. The horizon and sliders above do not change this walk.

Present value of free cash flow, 20 quarters$119.70B
Terminal-year revenue$214.66B
Terminal-year EBITDA$55.62B
Exit multiple, on EBITDA7.6x
Terminal value$422.72B
Discounted at 9.0% a year, terminal value becomes$274.74B
Share of enterprise value from the terminal70%
Enterprise value$394.43B
Net cash−$28.55B
Equity value$365.89B
Shares1.96B
Fair value per share$186.49
Against the deployed price of $204.21, as of −9%

9% is the cost of equity for a major running a 13.1% net debt ratio. The 7.0x exit sits between the 7.9x the market pays on trailing EBITDA that contains the spike quarter and the 6-7x a mid-cycle major usually fetches. Against FY2025 EBITDA of $39.9B the same enterprise value is 10.7x, which is the whole argument: the multiple you believe depends entirely on which EBITDA you think is normal.

Read the other way round: at $204.21 the market is paying 8.6x terminal-year EBITDA, holding every other assumption on this page fixed. That is the number to argue about.

Quarter by quarter

The projected path

The published model's 20 quarters. The horizon and sliders above do not change this table.

Quarter U.S. UpstreamInternational UpstreamU.S. DownstreamInternational DownstreamAll Other Revenue YoY EBITDA Capex FCF R40 PV of FCF
2026 Q3E $5.60B$12.46B$22.72B$22.90B$146M $63.82B +28% $19.68B $4.43B $11.17B +46 $10.93B
2026 Q4E $5.60B$11.74B$19.60B$21.13B$146M $58.21B +24% $17.48B $4.36B $9.60B +41 $9.20B
2027 Q1E $5.62B$11.26B$20.64B$19.92B$146M $57.58B +18% $16.39B $4.35B $8.82B +34 $8.27B
2027 Q2E $5.64B$10.93B$20.72B$19.08B$146M $56.51B −19% $15.54B $4.34B $8.19B −5 $7.52B
2027 Q3E $5.67B$10.72B$19.73B$18.48B$146M $54.74B −14% $14.84B $4.35B $7.68B 0 $6.90B
2027 Q4E $5.70B$10.58B$17.71B$18.07B$146M $52.20B −10% $14.26B $4.35B $7.26B +4 $6.38B
2028 Q1E $5.74B$10.50B$19.21B$17.77B$146M $53.37B −7% $14.07B $4.39B $7.09B +6 $6.10B
2028 Q2E $5.77B$10.46B$19.71B$17.57B$146M $53.66B −5% $13.90B $4.42B $6.94B +8 $5.84B
2028 Q3E $5.82B$10.45B$19.08B$17.42B$146M $52.91B −3% $13.73B $4.45B $6.80B +10 $5.60B
2028 Q4E $5.86B$10.47B$17.33B$17.33B$146M $51.13B −2% $13.56B $4.46B $6.65B +11 $5.36B
2029 Q1E $5.90B$10.50B$18.97B$17.27B$146M $52.78B −1% $13.60B $4.51B $6.65B +12 $5.25B
2029 Q2E $5.94B$10.54B$19.60B$17.24B$146M $53.46B 0% $13.62B $4.55B $6.64B +12 $5.12B
2029 Q3E $5.99B$10.59B$19.05B$17.22B$146M $53.00B 0% $13.61B $4.59B $6.60B +13 $4.99B
2029 Q4E $6.03B$10.65B$17.37B$17.22B$146M $51.42B +1% $13.56B $4.61B $6.55B +13 $4.84B
2030 Q1E $6.08B$10.72B$19.06B$17.23B$146M $53.24B +1% $13.68B $4.66B $6.60B +13 $4.78B
2030 Q2E $6.12B$10.79B$19.73B$17.25B$146M $54.04B +1% $13.76B $4.70B $6.63B +13 $4.70B
2030 Q3E $6.17B$10.86B$19.21B$17.28B$146M $53.66B +1% $13.80B $4.73B $6.64B +14 $4.60B
2030 Q4E $6.22B$10.94B$17.53B$17.31B$146M $52.14B +1% $13.80B $4.75B $6.62B +14 $4.49B
2031 Q1E $6.26B$11.02B$19.25B$17.34B$146M $54.01B +1% $13.95B $4.81B $6.70B +14 $4.45B
2031 Q2E $6.31B$11.10B$19.92B$17.37B$146M $54.85B +2% $14.06B $4.85B $6.75B +14 $4.38B

Every row is projected. A year-over-year change is shown only where the quarter it compares against exists — an em dash means there is no comparable quarter, not a flat year.

Track record

Model revisions

Assumptions are marked to reality as each quarter prints. Every change is appended here, with the fair value the model produced at the time, so the model's own history stays visible.

DateFair value thenNote
2026-08-27 $175.43 First published model, built from the verified 2026 Q2 research brief. Five reported segment lines, unit drivers on all four operating segments, a flat stub for All Other, and an explicit price-normalisation path out of a $104 Brent basis quarter.