BE · Forward model
Revenue by vertical, 20 quarters out
Model as of
Each segment is projected from its own operating driver, rolled up into consolidated cash flow, and discounted back to a fair value per share. The assumptions below are editable — change them and every number on this page moves with them.
Bloom reports four revenue streams — Product, Installation, Service and Electricity — on the face of every income statement, so all four verticals carry REPORTED revenue and nothing is apportioned. Every quarter from 2023 Q1 to 2026 Q2 is a disclosed split except the three fourth quarters, which are the full-year segment figure less the nine-month year-to-date and are flagged estimated. The stream revenues sum exactly to reported consolidated revenue in thirteen of fourteen quarters; 2023 Q4 differs by $1 thousand, a rounding artifact of that subtraction. What is NOT disclosed, and is therefore ours: the end-market split (AI data centre, utility channel, colocation, C&I) is nowhere in the filings and is deliberately not modelled; megawatts shipped or accepted are disclosed in no period, so every megawatt here is back-solved from an assumed $3.0M/MW; the installed service fleet is assumed; and Bloom allocates no operating expense to a stream, so verticals carry gross margin only and all opex sits in the corporate layer — which is what makes 33.38% gross margin less 16.27% opex reconcile to the reported 17.11% operating margin. One material item the engine cannot express: the Oracle warrant is contra-revenue, not cost. Its $324.4M fair value is recognised as a reduction of revenue as the Oracle systems ship, and $306.5M of that still sits on the balance sheet as a customer consideration asset. The product line here is GROSS of it, so cumulative product revenue through the Oracle delivery window is overstated by up to $306.5M — roughly 8.5% of that tranche. Net cash of -$17.6M treats the $206.5M of financing obligations as debt; excluding them it is +$188.9M.
Shares this page's scenario. Driver and horizon edits stay in your browser — the recipient sees the published model.
Latest: $2.25B (2031Q2E)
| Period | Value |
|---|---|
| 2023Q1 | $275M |
| 2023Q2 | $301M |
| 2023Q3 | $400M |
| 2023Q4 | $357M |
| 2024Q1 | $235M |
| 2024Q2 | $336M |
| 2024Q3 | $330M |
| 2024Q4 | $572M |
| 2025Q1 | $326M |
| 2025Q2 | $401M |
| 2025Q3 | $519M |
| 2025Q4 | $778M |
| 2026Q1 | $751M |
| 2026Q2 | $1.07B |
| 2026Q3E | $1.13B |
| 2026Q4E | $1.20B |
| 2027Q1E | $1.26B |
| 2027Q2E | $1.33B |
| 2027Q3E | $1.39B |
| 2027Q4E | $1.46B |
| 2028Q1E | $1.52B |
| 2028Q2E | $1.58B |
| 2028Q3E | $1.64B |
| 2028Q4E | $1.71B |
| 2029Q1E | $1.76B |
| 2029Q2E | $1.82B |
| 2029Q3E | $1.88B |
| 2029Q4E | $1.94B |
| 2030Q1E | $1.99B |
| 2030Q2E | $2.05B |
| 2030Q3E | $2.10B |
| 2030Q4E | $2.15B |
| 2031Q1E | $2.20B |
| 2031Q2E | $2.25B |
Where each case comes from
Bear case — primary sources
The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bear column is what happens if they are taken at face value.
GAAP remaining performance obligations at YE2025
- Feb 9, 2026 As of December 31, 2025, we have unsatisfied performance obligations of $ 394.4 million, primarily related to product sales and installation services.
- Feb 9, 2026 The terms of the contracted operations and maintenance services range from 5 to 20 years, subject to termination for convenience on an annual basis.
Oracle concentration at a single campus
The Oracle warrant reduces reported revenue as systems ship
Bull case — primary sources
The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bull column is what happens if they are taken at face value.
Oracle partnership expanded to 2.8 GW
Brookfield financing framework raised fivefold
AEP takes a substantial portion of its 900 MW option
AI sliver case — primary sources
The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the AI sliver column is what happens if they are taken at face value.
From cash flow to fair value
The published model, discounted at 11.0% a year with an exit multiple of 4.5x on revenue. The horizon and sliders above do not change this walk.
| Present value of free cash flow, 20 quarters | $3.66B |
| Terminal-year revenue | $8.70B |
| Terminal-year EBITDA | $1.79B |
| Exit multiple, on revenue | 4.5x |
| Terminal value | $39.17B |
| Discounted at 11.0% a year, terminal value becomes | $23.24B |
| Share of enterprise value from the terminal | 86% |
| Enterprise value | $26.91B |
| Net cash | −$18M |
| Equity value | $26.89B |
| Shares | 0.32B |
| Fair value per share | $83.16 |
| Against the deployed price of $276.98, as of | −70% |
GAAP-profitable for two quarters, one product line, and heavy concentration in a single named counterparty — 11% is the rate that pays for that. The 4.5x exit is power-equipment hardware at maturity; the stock trades near 16x forward revenue on the FY26 guide midpoint today.
Read the other way round: at $276.98 the market is paying 16.6x terminal-year revenue, holding every other assumption on this page fixed. That is the number to argue about.
Capex outside the verticals
Each vertical's capex is a share of its own revenue, which is the right shape for capacity that scales with sales. These are not that: fixed-size programmes with their own schedule that spend whether or not any segment grows. They are added on top, and they are why free cash flow dips in the years below.
Fremont capacity expansion, each incremental gigawatt beyond 2 GW
2027 Q1 → 2027 Q3The 10-K prices each incremental GW of run rate at $100-150M and six to nine months to install, up to a 5 GW ceiling the building can accommodate. This is the midpoint of one such step, and it belongs to no vertical.
The projected path
The published model's 20 quarters. The horizon and sliders above do not change this table.
| Quarter | Product — Energy Servers | Installation | Service — O&M on the installed fleet | Electricity — Bloom-owned systems | Revenue | YoY | EBITDA | Capex | FCF | R40 | PV of FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q3E | $994M | $51M | $78M | $10M | $1.13B | +118% | $216M | $49M | $150M | +131 | $146M |
| 2026 Q4E | $1.05B | $52M | $87M | $9M | $1.20B | +54% | $231M | $51M | $162M | +68 | $154M |
| 2027 Q1E | $1.11B | $53M | $98M | $9M | $1.26B | +68% | $246M | $95M | $136M | +79 | $126M |
| 2027 Q2E | $1.16B | $54M | $109M | $9M | $1.33B | +25% | $261M | $97M | $148M | +36 | $133M |
| 2027 Q3E | $1.21B | $54M | $120M | $9M | $1.39B | +23% | $276M | $98M | $159M | +35 | $140M |
| 2027 Q4E | $1.26B | $55M | $132M | $8M | $1.46B | +22% | $290M | $59M | $208M | +36 | $178M |
| 2028 Q1E | $1.31B | $57M | $144M | $8M | $1.52B | +20% | $304M | $60M | $220M | +35 | $183M |
| 2028 Q2E | $1.36B | $58M | $157M | $8M | $1.58B | +19% | $318M | $62M | $231M | +34 | $187M |
| 2028 Q3E | $1.41B | $59M | $170M | $8M | $1.64B | +18% | $332M | $63M | $242M | +33 | $191M |
| 2028 Q4E | $1.45B | $60M | $184M | $8M | $1.71B | +17% | $345M | $65M | $252M | +32 | $194M |
| 2029 Q1E | $1.50B | $62M | $197M | $7M | $1.76B | +16% | $358M | $67M | $263M | +31 | $197M |
| 2029 Q2E | $1.54B | $63M | $211M | $7M | $1.82B | +15% | $371M | $68M | $273M | +30 | $199M |
| 2029 Q3E | $1.58B | $65M | $225M | $7M | $1.88B | +14% | $384M | $70M | $283M | +29 | $201M |
| 2029 Q4E | $1.62B | $67M | $240M | $7M | $1.94B | +14% | $396M | $71M | $293M | +29 | $203M |
| 2030 Q1E | $1.66B | $68M | $254M | $7M | $1.99B | +13% | $408M | $72M | $302M | +28 | $204M |
| 2030 Q2E | $1.70B | $70M | $269M | $7M | $2.05B | +12% | $420M | $74M | $311M | +27 | $205M |
| 2030 Q3E | $1.74B | $72M | $283M | $6M | $2.10B | +12% | $431M | $75M | $320M | +27 | $206M |
| 2030 Q4E | $1.77B | $74M | $298M | $6M | $2.15B | +11% | $442M | $77M | $329M | +26 | $206M |
| 2031 Q1E | $1.81B | $76M | $313M | $6M | $2.20B | +11% | $453M | $78M | $338M | +26 | $206M |
| 2031 Q2E | $1.84B | $78M | $327M | $6M | $2.25B | +10% | $464M | $79M | $346M | +25 | $205M |
Every row is projected. A year-over-year change is shown only where the quarter it compares against exists — an em dash means there is no comparable quarter, not a flat year.
Model revisions
Assumptions are marked to reality as each quarter prints. Every change is appended here, with the fair value the model produced at the time, so the model's own history stays visible.
| Date | Fair value then | Note |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-27 | — | Audited quarterly cyclicality across all four revenue streams. Kept projections numerically unchanged: filings tie installation volatility to project mix and milestone timing, while product is already paced by capacity and customer delivery windows rather than a repeatable calendar quarter. |
| 2026-08-23 | — | First cut, built from the scope-model intake brief on the 2026 Q2 basis. |