SNDK · Forward model · Bull case
The Bull case, 20 quarters out
Each segment is projected from its own operating driver, rolled up into consolidated cash flow, and discounted back to a fair value per share. The assumptions below are editable — change them and every number on this page moves with them.
WHAT IS REPORTED. Sandisk runs a single reportable operating segment, so the only thing split three ways is revenue: the Datacenter/Edge/Consumer End Market Summary published in every earnings release. All ten quarters here are as reported and sum to consolidated revenue to the dollar in each one - $1,705M, $1,760M, $1,883M, $1,876M, $1,695M, $1,901M, $2,308M, $3,025M, $5,950M and $8,965M. Fiscal 2024 Q1 and Q2 are absent from every vertical because Sandisk did not file separately before the February 2025 separation and that split has never been published; nothing is back-filled from Western Digital, whose Cloud/Client/Consumer lines mixed HDD with flash. The FY2025 Cloud/Client/Consumer labels and the FY2026 Datacenter/Edge/Consumer labels are the same three lines renamed - the FY2025 totals are identical under both. UNITS ARE AN INDEX. Sandisk discloses exabyte GROWTH by end market and has never disclosed an exabyte LEVEL, so every unit driver here starts at 100 in the basis quarter and price per index point is that quarter's revenue divided by 100. Nothing in the traces is a dollars-per-gigabyte figure the company published. MARGINS ARE COMPANY-LEVEL. No profitability is reported below the company line - not in the release, not in the deck, not in the 10-K. The 84.6% basis margin and the 80.0% terminal margin on each vertical are Sandisk's own non-GAAP GROSS margins, applied uniformly and tagged assumed; operating expense is charged once at the corporate line at 5.0% of revenue, which is where the FQ1 2027 guide of $520-540M on a $10.55bn midpoint lands and what the Investor Day calls 'around five percent'. Gross less opex gives a 78.9% operating margin in the first projected quarter against the 79.2% just reported, and 75.2% across FY2031 against the ~75% guided for FY2028-FY2030. No Datacenter margin premium is invented; the one margin-relevant fact that is derivable points the other way, since Datacenter earns about 0.87x the company average revenue per bit. CAPEX IS ON A GROSS BASIS. 6.3% falling to 6.0% of revenue is Sandisk's GROSS investment including its share of Flash Ventures capex, matching the $562M shown for the basis quarter and the 'approximately 6% of revenue' guided for FY2027. It is NOT the $153M of cash capex (1.7%) that Sandisk's own reported free cash flow deducts. The 10-K's $6,559M of Flash Ventures commitments is deliberately not added as a separate corporate programme: its FY2027 tranche of $2,627M is 5.8% of a $48.96bn consensus year, so it IS the 6% guide, and carrying both would fund the joint venture twice. FREE CASH FLOW IS BEFORE WORKING CAPITAL. The engine takes EBITDA less gross capex less cash tax at the guided 15% non-GAAP rate. It prints a 61.8% margin in the first projected quarter, above the 56.2% adjusted free cash flow margin of the basis quarter and above the ~50% Sandisk guides for FY2028-FY2030, because management's 50% is stated 'after accounting for taxes, capital expenses, and working capital to support growth' and this model does not carry a working-capital line. Read the FCF margins as pre-working-capital. NO SEASONALITY ANYWHERE. Ten quarters of per-vertical history exist, spanning only two complete fiscal-year windows, one of which was a 53-week year with a 14-week first quarter. The window-to-window spread exceeds the candidate signal in all three lines - 1.423 for Datacenter, 0.718 for Edge, 0.274 for Consumer - and the three verticals compete for one capped bit pool, so Consumer's fiscal-Q4 trough is the mirror of Datacenter's peak rather than a season. Fitting factors would have projected a 2.3x Datacenter quarter every fiscal Q4 forever. Consumer is worth re-testing after FY2027 closes. WHERE THIS SPEC DEPARTS FROM THE RESEARCH BRIEF, AND WHY. (1) The brief's assumed volume rates blended to roughly 10% a year, below the mid-teens sellable bit growth Sandisk guides for FY2027; Datacenter is set to 6.5% a quarter instead of 4.0% so the bit-weighted blend comes to between 16% and 18% a year across the horizon whichever way the undisclosed Edge/Consumer bit split falls, consistent with the guide and with the disclosed allocation shift from 12% to 38% of bits. (2) The brief set the first quarter's price drift to zero, which would have printed $9.26bn against a guided $10.30-10.80bn; +14.0% in all three lines lands the quarter on the guided midpoint and implies about $45.7 of non-GAAP EPS on 155M guided diluted shares, inside the guided $44.00-46.00. The drift then decays at 0.35 a quarter to a negative terminal, so the guided quarter is a step and not a trend. (3) The exit is 6.0x terminal EBITDA rather than 9.0x, because the market itself prices Sandisk at 5.6x this model's FY2027 EBITDA today and memory comparables do not hold premium multiples on peak-cycle earnings. SHARES AND NET CASH. 146,419,001 shares outstanding at 7 August 2026 per the 10-K cover, the same count behind the $219.5bn market capitalisation. The guided FQ1 2027 diluted count is about 155 million, so a fully diluted fair value per share would be roughly 5.5% lower. Net cash of $6,539M is $4,762M of cash plus $1,777M of marketable equity securities against zero debt; a cash-only definition gives $4,762M and the equity securities are mark-to-market, which is what inverted GAAP EPS above non-GAAP this quarter. ONE DATA CAVEAT. data/companies/sndk/series.json carries $2,310M and $3,030M for 2026 Q1 and Q2 where the End Market Summary and income statement say $2,308M and $3,025M, and it mixes GAAP and non-GAAP EPS across 2026 Q3 and Q4. This model uses the released figures throughout.
Allocation persists and the NBMs turn the cycle into an annuity. Management's position is that demand exceeds supply beyond calendar 2027, that eight NBM customers have committed roughly half of FY2027 bits and two-thirds of FY2028 bits, and that $16.5bn of customer financial guarantees and $5.0bn of third-party collateral sit behind those commitments. If that holds, price does not revert on any horizon this model covers and the FY2028-FY2030 framework is a floor. This case runs revenue 1.25% a quarter above the base path, holds four more points of margin and exits at 7.5x.
Latest: $25.71B (2031Q4E)
| Period | Value |
|---|---|
| 2024Q3 | $1.71B |
| 2024Q4 | $1.76B |
| 2025Q1 | $1.88B |
| 2025Q2 | $1.88B |
| 2025Q3 | $1.70B |
| 2025Q4 | $1.90B |
| 2026Q1 | $2.31B |
| 2026Q2 | $3.02B |
| 2026Q3 | $5.95B |
| 2026Q4 | $8.96B |
| 2027Q1E | $10.69B |
| 2027Q2E | $12.12B |
| 2027Q3E | $13.28B |
| 2027Q4E | $14.23B |
| 2028Q1E | $15.04B |
| 2028Q2E | $15.74B |
| 2028Q3E | $16.37B |
| 2028Q4E | $16.98B |
| 2029Q1E | $17.57B |
| 2029Q2E | $18.16B |
| 2029Q3E | $18.77B |
| 2029Q4E | $19.39B |
| 2030Q1E | $20.05B |
| 2030Q2E | $20.73B |
| 2030Q3E | $21.45B |
| 2030Q4E | $22.21B |
| 2031Q1E | $23.01B |
| 2031Q2E | $23.86B |
| 2031Q3E | $24.76B |
| 2031Q4E | $25.71B |
What drives each segment
Datacenter
Units × priceEnterprise and hyperscale SSD, and the reason the stock re-rated: 12% of Sandisk's bits in Q4 FY2025, 38% one year later, $2,977M of revenue in the basis quarter against $213M a year earlier. Almost all of the NBM contracting sits here and in Edge. The risk is not demand - management says NAND stays on allocation beyond calendar 2027 - it is that this line's revenue per gigabyte was set at a shortage price.
Latest: $15.28B (2031Q4E)
| Period | Value |
|---|---|
| 2024Q3 | $97M |
| 2024Q4 | $170M |
| 2025Q1 | $300M |
| 2025Q2 | $250M |
| 2025Q3 | $197M |
| 2025Q4 | $213M |
| 2026Q1 | $269M |
| 2026Q2 | $440M |
| 2026Q3 | $1.47B |
| 2026Q4 | $2.98B |
| 2027Q1E | $3.66B |
| 2027Q2E | $4.28B |
| 2027Q3E | $4.85B |
| 2027Q4E | $5.38B |
| 2028Q1E | $5.87B |
| 2028Q2E | $6.35B |
| 2028Q3E | $6.83B |
| 2028Q4E | $7.31B |
| 2029Q1E | $7.80B |
| 2029Q2E | $8.31B |
| 2029Q3E | $8.85B |
| 2029Q4E | $9.41B |
| 2030Q1E | $10.00B |
| 2030Q2E | $10.63B |
| 2030Q3E | $11.29B |
| 2030Q4E | $12.00B |
| 2031Q1E | $12.75B |
| 2031Q2E | $13.54B |
| 2031Q3E | $14.38B |
| 2031Q4E | $15.28B |
Assumptions & reasoning
- Units are an INDEX, not exabytes: the basis quarter is 100 and price per index point is that quarter's revenue divided by 100. Sandisk discloses bit GROWTH by end market and has never published an exabyte LEVEL, so a physical unit count here would be an invented disclosure.
- FY2026 disclosure splits this line into its two terms: exabytes shipped up almost 120% and revenue per gigabyte up almost 150%. Both are growth rates from the 10-K; neither is a level, which is why the driver runs on an index.
- Volume grows 6.5% a quarter, faster than the company's mid-teens sellable bit growth, because the disclosed allocation shift - 12% of bits to 38% in four quarters - has to keep coming out of Edge and Consumer.
- Economics are company-level, not segment-level. Sandisk runs a single reportable operating segment and publishes one gross margin line, so 84.6% basis and 80.0% terminal are the company's own non-GAAP gross margins applied uniformly; operating expense sits once at the corporate line, never inside a vertical.
Edge
Units × priceClient SSD, embedded and removable flash into smartphones, PCs, tablets, automotive and robotics - the largest line at 60.6% of basis-quarter revenue. It is the purest price line in the business: FY2026 exabytes grew only high single digits while revenue per gigabyte rose almost 180%. Management says PCs and smartphones are working through a period of adjustment and expects those markets to return to growth in calendar 2027.
Latest: $9.89B (2031Q4E)
| Period | Value |
|---|---|
| 2024Q3 | $1.03B |
| 2024Q4 | $1.07B |
| 2025Q1 | $1.07B |
| 2025Q2 | $1.03B |
| 2025Q3 | $927M |
| 2025Q4 | $1.10B |
| 2026Q1 | $1.39B |
| 2026Q2 | $1.68B |
| 2026Q3 | $3.66B |
| 2026Q4 | $5.43B |
| 2027Q1E | $6.40B |
| 2027Q2E | $7.15B |
| 2027Q3E | $7.71B |
| 2027Q4E | $8.13B |
| 2028Q1E | $8.43B |
| 2028Q2E | $8.66B |
| 2028Q3E | $8.83B |
| 2028Q4E | $8.96B |
| 2029Q1E | $9.07B |
| 2029Q2E | $9.17B |
| 2029Q3E | $9.25B |
| 2029Q4E | $9.33B |
| 2030Q1E | $9.40B |
| 2030Q2E | $9.47B |
| 2030Q3E | $9.54B |
| 2030Q4E | $9.61B |
| 2031Q1E | $9.68B |
| 2031Q2E | $9.75B |
| 2031Q3E | $9.82B |
| 2031Q4E | $9.89B |
Assumptions & reasoning
- Units are an INDEX, not exabytes: the basis quarter is 100 and price per index point is that quarter's revenue divided by 100. Sandisk discloses bit GROWTH by end market and has never published an exabyte LEVEL, so a physical unit count here would be an invented disclosure.
- The 180% FY2026 increase in revenue per gigabyte is the largest price move of the three lines and the one with the most to give back, which is why its terminal drift is the most negative at -2.5% a quarter.
- The first projected quarter carries a +14.0% price drift in all three lines because the FQ1 2027 revenue guide of $10.30-10.80bn is a company number and no per-end-market guide exists; splitting it unevenly across the three would be inventing a disclosure Sandisk did not make.
- Edge and Consumer bits cannot be separated from disclosure: only their combined 62% share of company bits follows from the 38% Datacenter figure.
Consumer
Units × priceRetail cards, USB drives and consumer SSD - 6.2% of basis-quarter revenue and shrinking, because it is the residual claimant on the bit pool. FY2026 is the tell: Consumer exabytes fell mid-teens percent while revenue rose 29% on a low-fifties percent price increase, then the line fell 32% sequentially in a quarter the company grew 51%, as bits were pulled into Datacenter. Management calls it mix flexibility, and this is the line that gets sacrificed.
Latest: $549M (2031Q4E)
| Period | Value |
|---|---|
| 2024Q3 | $573M |
| 2024Q4 | $523M |
| 2025Q1 | $514M |
| 2025Q2 | $598M |
| 2025Q3 | $571M |
| 2025Q4 | $585M |
| 2026Q1 | $652M |
| 2026Q2 | $907M |
| 2026Q3 | $820M |
| 2026Q4 | $556M |
| 2027Q1E | $632M |
| 2027Q2E | $683M |
| 2027Q3E | $714M |
| 2027Q4E | $729M |
| 2028Q1E | $733M |
| 2028Q2E | $730M |
| 2028Q3E | $723M |
| 2028Q4E | $712M |
| 2029Q1E | $699M |
| 2029Q2E | $686M |
| 2029Q3E | $672M |
| 2029Q4E | $658M |
| 2030Q1E | $643M |
| 2030Q2E | $629M |
| 2030Q3E | $615M |
| 2030Q4E | $601M |
| 2031Q1E | $588M |
| 2031Q2E | $575M |
| 2031Q3E | $562M |
| 2031Q4E | $549M |
Assumptions & reasoning
- Units are an INDEX, not exabytes: the basis quarter is 100 and price per index point is that quarter's revenue divided by 100. Sandisk discloses bit GROWTH by end market and has never published an exabyte LEVEL, so a physical unit count here would be an invented disclosure.
- This is the vertical where a holiday season is visible, and it is still modelled aseasonal: the research brief measured a window-to-window spread of 0.274 against an FY2025 within-year amplitude of 0.15, with only two fiscal-year windows and one of them a 53-week year. An aseasonal path is modestly wrong in a repeating way; four factors fitted to two disagreeing windows would be wrong permanently.
- At 6.2% of basis-quarter revenue a 10% error in this line moves consolidated revenue by 0.6%, so the model spends no further complexity here.
Where each case comes from
Bear case — primary sources
The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bear column is what happens if they are taken at face value.
Bull case — primary sources
The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bull column is what happens if they are taken at face value.
NBM Floor case — primary sources
The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the NBM Floor column is what happens if they are taken at face value.
From cash flow to fair value
| Present value of free cash flow, 20 quarters | $177.64B |
| Terminal-year revenue | $97.35B |
| Terminal-year EBITDA | $77.13B |
| Exit multiple, on ebitda | 7.5x |
| Terminal value | $578.47B |
| Discounted at 10.0% a year, terminal value becomes | $359.18B |
| Enterprise value | $536.83B |
| Net cash | $6.54B |
| Equity value | $543.37B |
| Shares | 0.15B |
| Fair value per share | $3,711.05 |
| Against the current price of $1,484.95 | +150% |
Exit at 6.0x terminal EBITDA. Sandisk's own enterprise value of ~$213bn is 5.6x this model's FY2027 EBITDA of $38.0bn, and memory comparables do not sustain premium multiples on peak-cycle earnings, so the exit is set a shade above where the market prices the business today rather than at a growth multiple. Discounted at 11%, an equity-like rate for a debt-free business with no fab of its own that fell 55% in a month this summer.
Read the other way round: at $1,484.95 the market is paying 0.7x terminal-year revenue, holding every other assumption on this page fixed. That is the number to argue about.
The projected path
| Quarter | Datacenter | Edge | Consumer | Revenue | YoY | EBITDA | Capex | FCF | R40 | PV of FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 Q1E | $3.66B | $6.40B | $632M | $10.69B | +363% | $8.86B | $665M | $6.97B | +428 | $6.80B |
| 2027 Q2E | $4.28B | $7.15B | $683M | $12.12B | +301% | $9.97B | $747M | $7.84B | +365 | $7.48B |
| 2027 Q3E | $4.85B | $7.71B | $714M | $13.28B | +123% | $10.87B | $814M | $8.54B | +188 | $7.96B |
| 2027 Q4E | $5.38B | $8.13B | $729M | $14.23B | +59% | $11.59B | $868M | $9.11B | +123 | $8.28B |
| 2028 Q1E | $5.87B | $8.43B | $733M | $15.04B | +41% | $12.19B | $913M | $9.58B | +104 | $8.51B |
| 2028 Q2E | $6.35B | $8.66B | $730M | $15.74B | +30% | $12.70B | $953M | $9.99B | +93 | $8.66B |
| 2028 Q3E | $6.83B | $8.83B | $723M | $16.37B | +23% | $13.18B | $989M | $10.36B | +87 | $8.77B |
| 2028 Q4E | $7.31B | $8.96B | $712M | $16.98B | +19% | $13.63B | $1.02B | $10.71B | +82 | $8.85B |
| 2029 Q1E | $7.80B | $9.07B | $699M | $17.57B | +17% | $14.07B | $1.06B | $11.06B | +80 | $8.92B |
| 2029 Q2E | $8.31B | $9.17B | $686M | $18.16B | +15% | $14.51B | $1.09B | $11.41B | +78 | $8.99B |
| 2029 Q3E | $8.85B | $9.25B | $672M | $18.77B | +15% | $14.97B | $1.13B | $11.77B | +77 | $9.05B |
| 2029 Q4E | $9.41B | $9.33B | $658M | $19.39B | +14% | $15.45B | $1.17B | $12.14B | +77 | $9.12B |
| 2030 Q1E | $10.00B | $9.40B | $643M | $20.05B | +14% | $15.95B | $1.20B | $12.53B | +77 | $9.19B |
| 2030 Q2E | $10.63B | $9.47B | $629M | $20.73B | +14% | $16.48B | $1.25B | $12.95B | +77 | $9.27B |
| 2030 Q3E | $11.29B | $9.54B | $615M | $21.45B | +14% | $17.03B | $1.29B | $13.38B | +77 | $9.36B |
| 2030 Q4E | $12.00B | $9.61B | $601M | $22.21B | +15% | $17.62B | $1.33B | $13.85B | +77 | $9.46B |
| 2031 Q1E | $12.75B | $9.68B | $588M | $23.01B | +15% | $18.25B | $1.38B | $14.34B | +77 | $9.56B |
| 2031 Q2E | $13.54B | $9.75B | $575M | $23.86B | +15% | $18.91B | $1.43B | $14.86B | +77 | $9.68B |
| 2031 Q3E | $14.38B | $9.82B | $562M | $24.76B | +15% | $19.61B | $1.49B | $15.41B | +78 | $9.80B |
| 2031 Q4E | $15.28B | $9.89B | $549M | $25.71B | +16% | $20.36B | $1.54B | $15.99B | +78 | $9.93B |
Every row is projected. A year-over-year change is shown only where the quarter it compares against exists — an em dash means there is no comparable quarter, not a flat year.
Model revisions
Assumptions are marked to reality as each quarter prints. Every change is appended here, with the fair value the model produced at the time, so the model's own history stays visible.
| Date | Changed | Fair value then | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-27 | verticals, corporate, valuation, scenarios | $2,439.91 | First publication, from the FQ4 2026 release and 10-K, the 5 August guide and the 13 August Investor Day framework. Three unit drivers on a bit index with a +14.0% first-quarter price step decaying at 0.35 toward a negative terminal drift; company gross margin at the vertical, operating expense once at the corporate line; exit at 6.0x terminal EBITDA. |