← SKHY forward model

SKHY · Forward model · NAND flash

What has to happen in NAND flash

Model as of

This page changes NAND flash inside the complete SKHY model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.

SKHY forward model
Horizon
Consolidated fair value $187.86 all other verticals held in this portfolio case
Final-quarter revenue $24.44B 22% of company revenue
Explicit segment contribution $140.02B EBITDA less segment capex, before corporate items

NAND flash

Basis quarter$14.41B
Final quarter$24.44B
Implied CAGR+11%
Final revenue mix22%

Non-volatile memory, 27.7% of 2026 Q2 revenue and the line that inflected hardest: revenue rose 90% quarter on quarter on a mid-50% ASP increase as enterprise SSD demand for AI inference key-value cache storage overwhelmed a supply base that had been cutting output through 2025. SK hynix (with Solidigm) was the second-largest NAND supplier at an 18.5% revenue share in 2026 Q1 per IDC. Same driver shape as DRAM - bits times ASP against a fixed wafer base - with a later capacity response: Cheongju M17's first cleanroom is scheduled for December 2028.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $3.27B Reported
2025 Q4 $5.08B Estimated
2026 Q1 $7.60B Reported
2026 Q2 $14.41B Reported
Enterprise SSD (eSSD) for AI servers321-layer and 238-layer NAND componentsClient SSD and mobile storage (UFS)Solidigm data-centre SSD
Units 100/qtr growing +3.0% per quarter Index, 2026 Q2 = 100, on the same convention as DRAM. Absolute NAND bits are never disclosed.
Price per unit $144M drifting +15.0% per quarter $144.1m of revenue per index point: the basis quarter's $14.41bn NAND revenue divided by 100.
NAND flash

Latest: $24.44B (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2023Q1 $1.11B
2023Q2 $1.47B
2023Q3 $1.59B
2023Q4 $2.17B
2024Q1 $2.89B
2024Q2 $3.40B
2024Q3 $3.27B
2024Q4 $3.09B
2025Q1 $2.12B
2025Q2 $3.10B
2025Q3 $3.27B
2025Q4 $5.08B
2026Q1 $7.60B
2026Q2 $14.41B
2026Q3E $17.07B
2026Q4E $19.42B
2027Q1E $21.38B
2027Q2E $22.96B
2027Q3E $24.16B
2027Q4E $25.05B
2028Q1E $25.66B
2028Q2E $26.06B
2028Q3E $26.28B
2028Q4E $26.38B
2029Q1E $26.37B
2029Q2E $26.28B
2029Q3E $26.14B
2029Q4E $25.95B
2030Q1E $25.74B
2030Q2E $25.50B
2030Q3E $25.25B
2030Q4E $24.98B
2031Q1E $24.71B
2031Q2E $24.44B

Assumptions & reasoning

  • Same index convention as DRAM: units are 100 at 2026 Q2 and the price per index point is that quarter's NAND revenue of $14.41bn divided by 100. Bits start at the guided low-single-digit increase for 2026 Q3.
  • The June quarter does NOT close on the disclosed deltas: bits +15% times ASP +55% is +78%, against actual revenue growth of +89.7%. The roughly seven-point residual is mix - eSSD and 321-layer - inside an ASP the company quotes as a blended average.
  • NAND gets the harsher price path of the two lines: ASP peaks 40.9% above June 2026 in 2027 Q3 and ends the horizon 20.7% below it. The capacity answer is later than DRAM's - M17's first cleanroom is December 2028 - but the demand case is weaker too, at high-teens bit growth against DRAM's mid-20s in the company's own 2026 outlook.
  • Solidigm, the former Intel NAND business, sits inside this line and is not reported separately. On 6 August 2026 the company confirmed it is reviewing measures to strengthen that business after a report of a W5 trillion pre-IPO raise, so a disposal would change this line's composition without a disclosed baseline.
  • The terminal EBITDA margin is 30% against DRAM's 45%, which is an assumption, not a disclosure: no product-level margin exists in any filing. NAND revenue fell 31% quarter on quarter as recently as 2025 Q1, inside this very history.
SKHY model map

Explore another vertical