← UiPath, Inc.

PATH · Forward model · Dines case

The Dines case, 20 quarters out

Model as of

Each segment is projected from its own operating driver, rolled up into consolidated cash flow, and discounted back to a fair value per share. The assumptions below are editable — change them and every number on this page moves with them.

WHAT IS DISCLOSED. Both verticals are lines printed in UiPath's filed condensed consolidated statements of operations, read from each quarter's own 8-K exhibit 99.1 across thirteen quarters. Nothing is apportioned and nothing is estimated. The platform vertical is the SUM of two adjacent printed lines, Licenses and Subscription services; the services vertical is the Professional services and other line as printed. The two sum to reported total revenue to the dollar in all thirteen quarters. The ARR base, net new ARR, dollar-based net retention, the customer counts and the remaining performance obligations are disclosed figures; $1,901,211 thousand of ARR at 30 April 2026 is printed to the thousand in the 10-Q. WHY ARR AND NOT REVENUE. Reported revenue grew 17% in the basis quarter while ARR grew 12%. The difference is recognition timing: term licences are recognised UP FRONT at delivery, so a heavier licence quarter prints faster revenue growth than the recurring base earned. UiPath's own ARR definition covers subscription licences and maintenance and support and excludes professional services and perpetual licences, which is exactly why the two recognition halves sit in one vertical and the services line sits outside it. A model built on the revenue line would extrapolate the timing. This one extrapolates the base and lets the seasonality carry the calendar. WHAT IS ASSUMED. Forward net new ARR of $53.0m a quarter is UiPath's own fiscal 2027 exit-ARR guide divided by three quarters; its 0.5% quarterly growth, the 87.0% conversion rate and its 88.0% target, the 29.5% and 36.0% platform margins, the -110% and -70% services margins, the 18% tax rate, the 10% discount rate and the 4.0x exit multiple are judgements, and each carries its reasoning beside it. THE MARGIN BOUNDARY, STATED PLAINLY. The 29.5% platform margin nets to 24.1% consolidated after the loss-making services line. That sits on the non-GAAP operating margin UiPath guides for fiscal 2027 and near its adjusted free-cash-flow margin - and about 17 points ABOVE its GAAP operating margin of 6.7% in the basis quarter. The whole gap is stock-based compensation, $290.7m in fiscal 2026 and 18.0% of revenue. This model treats it as non-cash, which is the standard treatment across this repo, and for UiPath it is defensible on evidence rather than convention: the company repurchased 20.4 million shares for $243.8m in the basis quarter alone against $53.3m of stock-based compensation in the same quarter, and the diluted share count consequently FELL 3.8% year over year, to 527.8 million from 548.5 million. The buyback is more than neutralising the dilution. The model holds the share count flat and does not charge the buyback against free cash flow, both of which are conservative. WHAT THE TAX RATE IS NOT. UiPath's GAAP effective rate was 5.6% in fiscal 2026 and 45.0% in the basis quarter, and neither is a forward cash rate: both are artefacts of the valuation-allowance release that cut the allowance from $406.3m to $150.5m and produced a $202.7m non-cash deferred benefit. That single item is also why fiscal 2026 GAAP net income was $282.3m against $57m of GAAP operating income. The 18% constant used here sits between the roughly 17% of pre-tax income UiPath actually paid in cash in the basis quarter and a statutory rate as the $325.5m of loss carryforwards run down. WHAT IS NOT MODELLED. Acquisitions - WorkFusion closed 5 February 2026 for approximately $190.0m and is inside the basis quarter's actuals and inside the ARR base, but no further deal is projected or funded. The $500.0m repurchase authorised in March 2026 is a financing use of cash and is not charged as capex. There is no capital programme: UiPath has no fab, plant, data-centre estate or joint venture, and capital spending was 0.64% of revenue in the basis quarter. WHEN THIS GOES STALE. UiPath reports its fiscal 2027 second quarter on 3 September 2026, three days after this model was written, and that is the quarter management guided DOWN sequentially. The basis quarter and the reproduction target will both be superseded by that print.

PATH forward model
Horizon
Fair value per share $26.94 +94% against $13.87
Terminal-year revenue $3.07B last four projected quarters
Enterprise value $12.80B $2.31B explicit + $10.49B terminal

The founder's case, in his own filed words on the day of the print: the agentic products reached general availability in April 2025 and are now moving from pilot to production, with customers standardising on UiPath as the orchestration layer above their existing systems. If that lands, the monetisation half of the driver reprices - the same ARR base converts at a higher rate and net new ARR steps up - because an orchestration layer is priced on the processes it runs rather than on the robots it replaced. WHAT THIS CASE DOES NOT DO: it does not add a vertical, because nothing in the filings quantifies any of it. There is no disclosed agentic ARR, no agent count and no agentic pricing, so it is built as a lift to the ARR additions, the conversion rate and the multiple - 0.8% a quarter on revenue, three points of margin and a 5.5x exit - and not as a new revenue line. It reaches $26.94, 48.4% above the tape, and even that leaves ARR growing slower in 2031 than the 12% UiPath prints today.

PATH REVENUE MODEL

Latest: $757M (2032Q1E)

Period Value
2024Q1 $290M
2024Q2 $287M
2024Q3 $326M
2024Q4 $405M
2025Q1 $335M
2025Q2 $316M
2025Q3 $355M
2025Q4 $424M
2026Q1 $357M
2026Q2 $362M
2026Q3 $411M
2026Q4 $481M
2027Q1 $418M
2027Q2E $402M
2027Q3E $455M
2027Q4E $556M
2028Q1E $467M
2028Q2E $461M
2028Q3E $520M
2028Q4E $635M
2029Q1E $532M
2029Q2E $525M
2029Q3E $590M
2029Q4E $719M
2030Q1E $602M
2030Q2E $592M
2030Q3E $665M
2030Q4E $809M
2031Q1E $677M
2031Q2E $665M
2031Q3E $746M
2031Q4E $906M
2032Q1E $757M
Scenarios

Where each case comes from

Bear case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bear column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Base case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Base column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Bull case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bull column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Dines case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Dines column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Valuation

From cash flow to fair value

The published model, discounted at 10.0% a year with an exit multiple of 5.5x on revenue. The sliders above do not change this walk.

Present value of free cash flow, 20 quarters$2.31B
Terminal-year revenue$3.07B
Terminal-year EBITDA$1.01B
Exit multiple, on revenue5.5x
Terminal value$16.90B
Discounted at 10.0% a year, terminal value becomes$10.49B
Share of enterprise value from the terminal82%
Enterprise value$12.80B
Net cash$1.42B
Equity value$14.22B
Shares0.53B
Fair value per share$26.94
Against the deployed price of $13.87, as of +94%

A 10% discount rate is peer-consistent for a profitable software business with $1.42bn of net cash, no debt of any kind and no financing need - the same rate this repo uses for OKTA, DDOG and CRWD. The exit multiple is where the argument is. At $18.15 UiPath's enterprise value is $8.16bn, which is 4.59x the guided fiscal 2027 revenue midpoint and 4.29x current ARR. The base takes 4.0x terminal revenue, 13% of compression over five years on a line whose growth roughly halves: the model's terminal year grows 8.3% at a 29.8% EBITDA margin and a 23.6% free-cash-flow margin, which is 16.9x terminal free cash flow. Repo comparables sit either side - Salesforce at 4.5x on roughly 10% growth, Okta at 6.0x on a 29% free-cash-flow margin, Datadog at 8.0x on mid-teens growth, none of which UiPath reaches. Terminal value is $6.58bn of the $8.49bn enterprise value in the base case, 77.6% of it, so the exit multiple is by a wide margin the single largest input in this model and anything said about UiPath being cheap or expensive is a statement about that number. Holding every other input fixed, fair value runs $14.08 at 2.5x, $15.64 at 3.0x, $17.20 at 3.5x, $18.76 at 4.0x, $20.32 at 4.5x, $21.88 at 5.0x and $23.44 at 5.5x - roughly $3.12 a share per turn. The average sell-side twelve-month target of $13.44 corresponds to about 2.3x on these inputs; the tape at $18.15 corresponds to about 3.8x.

Read the other way round: at $13.87 the market is paying 1.9x terminal-year revenue, holding every other assumption on this page fixed. That is the number to argue about.

Quarter by quarter

The projected path

Quarter Platform (licences and subscription services)Professional services and other Revenue YoY EBITDA Capex FCF R40 PV of FCF
2027 Q2E $386M$17M $402M +11% $109M $3M $87M +33 $85M
2027 Q3E $437M$17M $455M +11% $127M $4M $101M +33 $97M
2027 Q4E $538M$18M $556M +16% $162M $5M $129M +39 $120M
2028 Q1E $449M$18M $467M +12% $134M $4M $106M +35 $97M
2028 Q2E $443M$18M $461M +15% $133M $4M $106M +38 $94M
2028 Q3E $501M$19M $520M +14% $154M $5M $122M +38 $106M
2028 Q4E $615M$19M $635M +14% $194M $6M $155M +39 $131M
2029 Q1E $513M$20M $532M +14% $160M $5M $127M +38 $105M
2029 Q2E $504M$20M $525M +14% $158M $5M $126M +38 $101M
2029 Q3E $569M$21M $590M +13% $182M $5M $145M +38 $114M
2029 Q4E $698M$21M $719M +13% $228M $7M $181M +39 $140M
2030 Q1E $581M$22M $602M +13% $188M $6M $149M +38 $112M
2030 Q2E $570M$22M $592M +13% $185M $6M $147M +38 $108M
2030 Q3E $643M$22M $665M +13% $212M $6M $168M +38 $121M
2030 Q4E $786M$23M $809M +13% $264M $8M $210M +39 $147M
2031 Q1E $653M$23M $677M +12% $217M $6M $173M +38 $118M
2031 Q2E $641M$24M $665M +12% $213M $6M $170M +38 $113M
2031 Q3E $721M$24M $746M +12% $243M $7M $194M +38 $126M
2031 Q4E $881M$25M $906M +12% $302M $9M $241M +39 $153M
2032 Q1E $731M$25M $757M +12% $248M $7M $198M +38 $123M

Every row is projected. A year-over-year change is shown only where the quarter it compares against exists — an em dash means there is no comparable quarter, not a flat year.

Track record

Model revisions

Assumptions are marked to reality as each quarter prints. Every change is appended here, with the fair value the model produced at the time, so the model's own history stays visible.

DateFair value thenNote
2026-08-31 $18.76 First publication. Basis 2027 Q1, the three months ended 30 April 2026. Built on the disclosed ARR base and its measured conversion into recognised revenue rather than on the reported revenue line, because reported revenue grew 17% while ARR grew 12% and the difference is upfront licence recognition.