← NET forward model

NET · Forward model · Large customers (>$100k) · Prince case

What has to happen in Large customers (>$100k)

Model as of

This page changes Large customers (>$100k) inside the complete NET model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.

NET forward model
Horizon
Consolidated fair value $322.12 all other verticals held in this portfolio case
Final-quarter revenue $2.05B 74% of company revenue
Explicit segment contribution $5.86B EBITDA less segment capex, before corporate items

Management's own stated target, taken at face value: the $5B annual run rate Matthew Prince has guided to for FY2028. The deltas are set so the case lands there and not past it — it reaches $5.08B in FY2028 against the base case's $4.66B — which makes this the one scenario calibrated to a number the company has committed to rather than to a view of ours. Note what it does NOT assume: no acceleration in large-customer adds beyond the record year just posted, and no Act 4 heroics beyond the base case. The whole gap to base is revenue per large account, which is where Prince says the Acts show up.

Large customers (>$100k)

Basis quarter$508M
Final quarter$2.05B
Implied CAGR+32%
Final revenue mix74%

The 4,698 accounts spending more than $100,000 a year, which are 73% of revenue and rising. This is where Acts 1, 2 and 3 all land: an enterprise buys the reverse proxy first, then Zero Trust, then Workers and R2, and the whole expansion shows up as revenue per account rather than as a new line. Dollar-based net retention of 120% is the number that decides this vertical, and the count of accounts is the number that decides how fast it compounds.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $410M Estimated
2025 Q4 $449M Estimated
2026 Q1 $461M Estimated
2026 Q2 $508M Estimated
Application services (CDN, DNS, WAF, DDoS, bot management)Zero Trust and SASE (Cloudflare One, ZTNA, SWG, CASB, Magic Transit)Developer platform (Workers, Workers AI, R2, D1, Durable Objects)Committed-spend and pool-of-funds enterprise contracts
Units 4698/qtr growing +4.5% per quarter 4,698 accounts over $100k annualised at 2026 Q2, up 27% year over year — a disclosed count, not an estimate.
Price per unit $108158 drifting +2.0% per quarter $108,158 per account per quarter — the disclosed 73% share divided by the disclosed count, so both inputs are reported.
Large customers (>$100k)

Latest: $2.05B (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2025Q2 $364M
2025Q3 $410M
2025Q4 $449M
2026Q1 $461M
2026Q2 $508M
2026Q3E $548M
2026Q4E $591M
2027Q1E $636M
2027Q2E $683M
2027Q3E $734M
2027Q4E $788M
2028Q1E $846M
2028Q2E $907M
2028Q3E $973M
2028Q4E $1.04B
2029Q1E $1.12B
2029Q2E $1.20B
2029Q3E $1.28B
2029Q4E $1.37B
2030Q1E $1.46B
2030Q2E $1.57B
2030Q3E $1.68B
2030Q4E $1.79B
2031Q1E $1.92B
2031Q2E $2.05B

Assumptions & reasoning

  • Modelled on accounts x revenue per account rather than a growth rate, because both halves are disclosed every quarter and they move independently: the count is a sales-motion number and the price is a product-attach number. A single growth rate would hide which one is carrying the quarter, which is the only interesting question about this cohort.
  • The Acts are inside this line, not beside it. Workers and Zero Trust sell into accounts that already buy application services, so their contribution arrives as revenue per account rising from $97,992 to $108,158 over the last five quarters. If you want a view on Workers specifically, take it by moving the price drift, not by inventing a Workers vertical.
  • Capex intensity RISES here, 10% to 13%, which is the opposite of every other mature line on this site. AI inference at the edge needs GPUs in points of presence that used to hold cache; gross margin has already fallen from 77.8% to 71.8% over four years on exactly this. The margin glide up to 44% assumes the May 2026 restructuring — a 20% workforce reduction, $140-150M of charges — pays for that capex in operating leverage. If it does not, this line is the first place it shows.
  • The dollar split is derived, the inputs are not. Cloudflare disclosed 71%, 73%, 73%, 72% and 73% for the five quarters here, and disclosed the account count each time. Multiplying one by the other is arithmetic on two disclosures — but the percentages are rounded to whole numbers, so treat the level as good to about half a point of revenue and no better.
NET model map

Explore another vertical