← Nebius Group N.V.

NBIS · Forward model · Bull case

The Bull case, 20 quarters out

Model as of

Each segment is projected from its own operating driver, rolled up into consolidated cash flow, and discounted back to a fair value per share. The assumptions below are editable — change them and every number on this page moves with them.

Nebius reports three operating segments plus eliminations, and quarterly segment revenue is disclosed or cleanly derivable back to 2024 Q3, so the split here is reported rather than invented. The two verticals sum to filed consolidated revenue in all eight historical quarters: $32.1M, $35.2M, $50.9M, $105.1M, $146.1M, $227.7M, $399.0M and $582.3M. Toloka was deconsolidated in Q2 2025 and every prior period was restated to continuing operations, so these figures are on the restated base and no growth rate quoted before that reclassification is comparable. What is NOT disclosed is any quarterly capacity series: connected and active megawatts exist only as year-end actuals - 25 MW connected at the end of 2024, about 170 MW active at the end of 2025 - and as guidance of 800 MW to 1 GW connected at the end of 2026. There is no megawatt figure at all for 2026 Q1 or Q2 and no utilisation figure anywhere, so a capacity driver would have had to invent its own installed base; the megawatt ladder is used as scenario evidence only. What is ours: the growth path and its decay, the margin and capex glides, the tax rate, the discount rate and the exit multiple. Corporate overhead is set to zero deliberately, because from Q2 2026 corporate-function expense is already inside the cloud segment's costs and charging it again would double count. Share count is the economic-basic 308.7M - 271.9M outstanding at 2026-06-30 plus the 21.1M NVIDIA pre-funded warrants the company itself counts as outstanding plus the ~15.8M Class A issued in the August 24 note exchange - and is then held flat, so further dilution from the 65.4M anti-dilutive convertible shares, the new 2030 and 2034 notes and the remaining ATM capacity is charged nowhere. Net debt is the basis-date $503.6M; the July secured facility and the August $5.75B of convertibles are not rolled in, because the July and August capex and interest that would offset them are undisclosed. FY2026 revenue guidance, the ~40% adjusted EBITDA margin and the $20-25B capex range exist only in the earnings call - no SEC filing contains them - and adjusted EBITDA adds back the depreciation that all that capex creates, which is why this model charges capex in cash rather than valuing a multiple of EBITDA.

NBIS forward model
Horizon
Fair value per share $489.16 +116% against $226.39
Terminal-year revenue $97.13B last four projected quarters
Enterprise value $151.52B -$65.78B explicit + $217.30B terminal

The high end of every guided range plus the pricing evidence management put on the record: an auction that cleared 15% above the best previous Blackwell price, more than 30% higher pricing on older-generation GPUs than in Q1, and short-term capacity priced at $40-50M per megawatt against the $20-25M on the landmark deals. Payback of one year and ten months on Q2 deals, down from a two-to-three-year range, is the single number that changes the economics of the fleet, because it is what turns a capex machine into a compounding one inside this horizon.

NBIS REVENUE MODEL

Latest: $26.93B (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2024Q3 $32M
2024Q4 $35M
2025Q1 $51M
2025Q2 $105M
2025Q3 $146M
2025Q4 $228M
2026Q1 $399M
2026Q2 $582M
2026Q3E $935M
2026Q4E $1.42B
2027Q1E $2.06B
2027Q2E $2.84B
2027Q3E $3.79B
2027Q4E $4.87B
2028Q1E $6.08B
2028Q2E $7.39B
2028Q3E $8.80B
2028Q4E $10.28B
2029Q1E $11.81B
2029Q2E $13.38B
2029Q3E $14.99B
2029Q4E $16.62B
2030Q1E $18.28B
2030Q2E $19.96B
2030Q3E $21.66B
2030Q4E $23.39B
2031Q1E $25.14B
2031Q2E $26.93B
Scenarios

Where each case comes from

Bear case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bear column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Bull case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bull column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Volozh case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Volozh column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Valuation

From cash flow to fair value

Present value of free cash flow, 20 quarters-$65.78B
Terminal-year revenue$97.13B
Terminal-year EBITDA$48.87B
Exit multiple, on revenue4.5x
Terminal value$437.07B
Discounted at 15.0% a year, terminal value becomes$217.30B
Share of enterprise value from the terminal143%
Enterprise value$151.52B
Net cash-$504M
Equity value$151.01B
Shares0.31B
Fair value per share$489.16
Against the deployed price of $226.39, as of +116%

15% matches the rate the r40 CoreWeave model uses for a levered, negative-free-cash-flow neocloud; NBIS carries less net debt at the basis date but a heavier dilution stack - 65.4M anti-dilutive convertible shares at Q2, $5.75B of new 2030 and 2034 notes struck at $313.46 and $324.65, and 12.3M of ATM capacity left. The 3.5x exit sits above CoreWeave's 3.0x because the cloud segment earns a 49.7% adjusted EBITDA margin against CoreWeave's 59% on far more debt, and because at 2031 Q2 this model still spends 60% of revenue on capex and free cash flow is still negative. The exit multiple is therefore pricing the steady state after the build, not the terminal quarter. The shares trade near 19.7x FY2026 guided revenue and 5.6x FY2027 consensus.

Read the other way round: at $226.39 the market is paying 2.8x terminal-year revenue, holding every other assumption on this page fixed. That is the number to argue about.

Quarter by quarter

The projected path

Quarter Nebius AI cloudAvride, TripleTen and eliminations Revenue YoY EBITDA Capex FCF R40 PV of FCF
2026 Q3E $928M$7M $935M $450M $6.17B -$5.72B -$5.52B
2026 Q4E $1.41B$7M $1.42B $709M $7.01B -$6.30B -$5.88B
2027 Q1E $2.05B$7M $2.06B +415% $1.04B $7.65B -$6.61B +94 -$5.95B
2027 Q2E $2.84B$8M $2.84B +389% $1.46B $8.11B -$6.65B +155 -$5.78B
2027 Q3E $3.78B$8M $3.79B +305% $1.94B $8.41B -$6.46B +134 -$5.43B
2027 Q4E $4.86B$8M $4.87B +242% $2.50B $8.60B -$6.10B +117 -$4.95B
2028 Q1E $6.07B$8M $6.08B +195% $3.12B $8.75B -$5.63B +103 -$4.41B
2028 Q2E $7.38B$9M $7.39B +160% $3.80B $8.91B -$5.12B +91 -$3.87B
2028 Q3E $8.79B$9M $8.80B +132% $4.51B $9.11B -$4.60B +80 -$3.36B
2028 Q4E $10.27B$9M $10.28B +111% $5.26B $9.39B -$4.13B +71 -$2.91B
2029 Q1E $11.80B$10M $11.81B +94% $6.03B $9.75B -$3.72B +63 -$2.53B
2029 Q2E $13.37B$10M $13.38B +81% $6.82B $10.20B -$3.39B +56 -$2.23B
2029 Q3E $14.98B$10M $14.99B +70% $7.62B $10.75B -$3.13B +50 -$1.98B
2029 Q4E $16.61B$11M $16.62B +62% $8.44B $11.37B -$2.94B +44 -$1.80B
2030 Q1E $18.27B$11M $18.28B +55% $9.26B $12.08B -$2.82B +39 -$1.67B
2030 Q2E $19.95B$12M $19.96B +49% $10.09B $12.84B -$2.75B +35 -$1.58B
2030 Q3E $21.65B$12M $21.66B +45% $10.93B $13.67B -$2.74B +32 -$1.52B
2030 Q4E $23.38B$13M $23.39B +41% $11.78B $14.56B -$2.78B +29 -$1.48B
2031 Q1E $25.13B$13M $25.14B +38% $12.64B $15.49B -$2.85B +26 -$1.47B
2031 Q2E $26.92B$14M $26.93B +35% $13.52B $16.47B -$2.95B +24 -$1.47B

Every row is projected. A year-over-year change is shown only where the quarter it compares against exists — an em dash means there is no comparable quarter, not a flat year.

Track record

Model revisions

Assumptions are marked to reality as each quarter prints. Every change is appended here, with the fair value the model produced at the time, so the model's own history stays visible.

DateFair value thenNote
2026-08-27 $136.85 First build, on the 2026 Q2 basis. Calibrated to the reaffirmed FY2026 guide, the $7-9B exit ARR, the $37.5B RPO runoff schedule and the $11.96B FY2027 consensus.