MU · Forward model
Revenue by vertical, 20 quarters out
Model as of
Each segment is projected from its own operating driver, rolled up into consolidated cash flow, and discounted back to a fair value per share. The assumptions below are editable — change them and every number on this page moves with them.
Quarters are fiscal, the way Micron labels them: 2026 Q3 is the quarter ended 28 May 2026. Micron reports four business units and this model carries exactly those four — Cloud Memory, Core Data Center, Mobile and Client, Automotive and Embedded — with no sub-splits invented underneath them. Every revenue point is reported, so nothing is marked estimated. They do not quite add up, and that is Micron's arithmetic rather than this model's: the four units sum to $41,448M against a reported $41,456M in the basis quarter, an $8M residual Micron does not assign to any unit, and the same $1M-$8M gap appears in each earlier quarter. What IS assumed, and heavily, is the split of each unit's revenue into bits and price. Micron publishes no bit volumes, so the petabyte figures are revenue divided by an assumed price per gigabyte: the LEVEL is calibrated and the claim is the SHAPE. That shape changed on 18 August 2026. The model used to revert prices from the first projected quarter, which put it ~30% below the street for fiscal 2027 and below Micron's own next-quarter guide. Two disclosures in the 2026 Q3 10-Q say that is wrong. First, the strategic customer agreements are TAKE-OR-PAY with price bands: 'The largest agreements generally have a ceiling price for existing products that approximates the market price in the second calendar quarter of 2026, and a floor price through the term of the agreement,' and Micron expects gross margins at those FLOOR prices to be 'well above our peak quarterly margins in any past cycle.' That is a floor under the downside AND a ceiling on the upside, and the model now carries both. Second, customers are prepaying to secure supply: $22B of cash deposits and related financial commitments on agreements concluded to date, about $18B of it cash. Price now starts strongly positive and glides negative rather than falling from day one, so revenue peaks in fiscal 2028 and declines after, as the fabs being built now land. Fiscal 2027 lands at about $233B against a street range of roughly $225-240B.
Shares this page's scenario. Driver and horizon edits stay in your browser — the recipient sees the published model.
Latest: $57.03B (2031Q3E)
| Period | Value |
|---|---|
| 2025Q3 | $9.30B |
| 2025Q4 | $11.31B |
| 2026Q1 | $13.64B |
| 2026Q2 | $23.86B |
| 2026Q3 | $41.45B |
| 2026Q4E | $48.04B |
| 2027Q1E | $53.24B |
| 2027Q2E | $57.17B |
| 2027Q3E | $60.07B |
| 2027Q4E | $62.19B |
| 2028Q1E | $63.73B |
| 2028Q2E | $64.56B |
| 2028Q3E | $64.55B |
| 2028Q4E | $64.38B |
| 2029Q1E | $64.12B |
| 2029Q2E | $63.81B |
| 2029Q3E | $63.47B |
| 2029Q4E | $63.12B |
| 2030Q1E | $62.77B |
| 2030Q2E | $62.42B |
| 2030Q3E | $62.09B |
| 2030Q4E | $61.77B |
| 2031Q1E | $60.11B |
| 2031Q2E | $58.53B |
| 2031Q3E | $57.03B |
Where each case comes from
Bear case — primary sources
The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bear column is what happens if they are taken at face value.
What turns the cycle: new fabs, and China
- Aug 16, 2026 Memory shortage could turn into a glut by 2028, says Kwon Seok-joon... conventional DRAM could face excess capacity beginning in 2029. China, he said, is the largest uncertainty.
- Aug 17, 2026 CXMT sits on the other side of this trade. Running around 300,000 wafers a month, close to MU's total DRAM capacity, CXMT still channels almost all its silicon into conventional bits, swallowing the market space vacated by the top three.
Bull case — primary sources
The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bull column is what happens if they are taken at face value.
2027 capacity is reported sold out across the industry
- Aug 18, 2026 All 2027 DRAM & HBM capacity at Samsung, $SKHY & $MU sold out... Samsung says shortage persists through to 2028 and gets tighter in 2027.
- Aug 11, 2026 Meaningful new industry capacity is not expected until late 2027 or (more likely) 2028. Supply is meeting only ~60-70% of requested volumes in many cases for 2027.
Contracted case — primary sources
The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Contracted column is what happens if they are taken at face value.
The agreements, from the 2026 Q3 10-Q
- Jun 25, 2026 Strategic customer agreements are structured as take-or-pay agreements, with binding commitments for specific volumes over the multi-year contract terms.
- Jun 25, 2026 The largest agreements generally have a ceiling price for existing products that approximates the market price in the second calendar quarter of 2026, and a floor price through the term of the agreement.
- Jun 25, 2026 We expect gross margins from our strategic customer agreements with price bands, even at floor pricing levels, to yield gross margins well above our peak quarterly margins in any past cycle.
Customers are prepaying for supply
- Jun 25, 2026 we expect to receive cash deposits and related financial commitments of $22 billion for agreements concluded to date. Approximately $18 billion of these commitments will be in the form of cash deposits.
- Jun 25, 2026 Robust overall DRAM and NAND demand and constrained supply has led to increased pricing and improved the profitability across our portfolio.
From cash flow to fair value
| Present value of free cash flow, 20 quarters | $291.55B |
| Terminal-year revenue | $237.45B |
| Terminal-year EBITDA | $130.85B |
| Exit multiple, on revenue | 3.5x |
| Terminal value | $831.07B |
| Discounted at 11.0% a year, terminal value becomes | $493.20B |
| Share of enterprise value from the terminal | 63% |
| Enterprise value | $784.75B |
| Net cash | $24.00B |
| Equity value | $808.75B |
| Shares | 1.15B |
| Fair value per share | $706.33 |
| Against the deployed price of $1,016.59, as of | -31% |
3.5x terminal revenue, on a terminal year with roughly a 55% EBITDA margin — about 6x EBITDA, which is where memory trades on mid-cycle earnings. The discount rate is 11% rather than NVIDIA's 10% because this is a commodity producer with a cycle, not a platform, and each case discounts at its own rate: 14% in Bear, 9.5% in Bull, 10% in Contracted. The shape the model now carries is a peak, not a plateau — revenue rises through fiscal 2027, peaks in fiscal 2028 around $257B, and declines from there as the fabs being built now come online. That is what the sources support: 2027 capacity sold out, and the new supply landing 2028-2029. Move the slider: at 2x the fair value is about $522 and at 6x about $1,014 — so even a re-rating to 6x on this operating case only just reaches today's price. The honest warning is unchanged — the exit multiple and the price drift together decide almost the whole answer, and both are opinions about when the cycle turns, not facts about it.
Read the other way round: at $1,016.59 the market is paying 6.0x terminal-year revenue, holding every other assumption on this page fixed. That is the number to argue about.
The projected path
| Quarter | Cloud Memory | Core Data Center | Mobile and Client | Automotive and Embedded | Revenue | YoY | EBITDA | Capex | FCF | R40 | PV of FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q4E | $16.10B | $13.62B | $13.31B | $5.00B | $48.04B | +325% | $38.21B | $10.11B | $23.88B | +374 | $23.27B |
| 2027 Q1E | $18.00B | $15.29B | $14.61B | $5.33B | $53.24B | +290% | $40.46B | $11.71B | $24.44B | +336 | $23.19B |
| 2027 Q2E | $19.50B | $16.55B | $15.49B | $5.62B | $57.17B | +140% | $41.66B | $13.05B | $24.32B | +182 | $22.49B |
| 2027 Q3E | $20.67B | $17.49B | $16.03B | $5.88B | $60.07B | +45% | $42.13B | $14.17B | $23.77B | +85 | $21.42B |
| 2027 Q4E | $21.57B | $18.18B | $16.32B | $6.11B | $62.19B | +29% | $42.13B | $15.08B | $22.99B | +66 | $20.18B |
| 2028 Q1E | $22.28B | $18.69B | $16.45B | $6.32B | $63.73B | +20% | $41.84B | $15.84B | $22.10B | +54 | $18.90B |
| 2028 Q2E | $22.83B | $19.07B | $16.16B | $6.51B | $64.56B | +13% | $41.22B | $16.40B | $21.10B | +46 | $17.58B |
| 2028 Q3E | $23.26B | $19.36B | $15.25B | $6.68B | $64.55B | +7% | $40.23B | $16.73B | $19.98B | +38 | $16.22B |
| 2028 Q4E | $23.60B | $19.60B | $14.35B | $6.84B | $64.38B | +4% | $39.29B | $16.98B | $18.97B | +33 | $15.00B |
| 2029 Q1E | $23.88B | $19.79B | $13.47B | $6.99B | $64.12B | +1% | $38.42B | $17.17B | $18.06B | +29 | $13.91B |
| 2029 Q2E | $24.09B | $19.96B | $12.63B | $7.13B | $63.81B | -1% | $37.62B | $17.32B | $17.25B | +26 | $12.95B |
| 2029 Q3E | $24.26B | $20.11B | $11.83B | $7.27B | $63.47B | -2% | $36.90B | $17.44B | $16.54B | +24 | $12.09B |
| 2029 Q4E | $24.39B | $20.26B | $11.07B | $7.40B | $63.12B | -2% | $36.24B | $17.52B | $15.91B | +23 | $11.34B |
| 2030 Q1E | $24.49B | $20.39B | $10.36B | $7.53B | $62.77B | -2% | $35.66B | $17.59B | $15.36B | +22 | $10.66B |
| 2030 Q2E | $24.56B | $20.52B | $9.69B | $7.66B | $62.42B | -2% | $35.14B | $17.63B | $14.88B | +22 | $10.06B |
| 2030 Q3E | $24.60B | $20.64B | $9.06B | $7.78B | $62.09B | -2% | $34.67B | $17.66B | $14.46B | +21 | $9.52B |
| 2030 Q4E | $24.62B | $20.77B | $8.48B | $7.91B | $61.77B | -2% | $34.25B | $17.68B | $14.09B | +21 | $9.04B |
| 2031 Q1E | $24.61B | $19.54B | $7.93B | $8.04B | $60.11B | -4% | $33.17B | $17.30B | $13.49B | +18 | $8.43B |
| 2031 Q2E | $24.58B | $18.37B | $7.41B | $8.16B | $58.53B | -6% | $32.17B | $16.93B | $12.96B | +16 | $7.89B |
| 2031 Q3E | $24.54B | $17.27B | $6.93B | $8.29B | $57.03B | -8% | $31.25B | $16.56B | $12.49B | +14 | $7.41B |
Every row is projected. A year-over-year change is shown only where the quarter it compares against exists — an em dash means there is no comparable quarter, not a flat year.
Model revisions
Assumptions are marked to reality as each quarter prints. Every change is appended here, with the fair value the model produced at the time, so the model's own history stays visible.
| Date | Fair value then | Note |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-17 | $542.18 | First cut, built on the FQ3-26 press release. Four verticals matching Micron's four business units; bits and price split out under each. |
| 2026-08-18 | $542.18 | Core Data Center ceiling raised to 9,800 PB and bit growth to 7% a quarter; Mobile and Client volume growth to 5.5%. Each scenario now discounts at its own rate and carries its own terminal growth delta. |
| 2026-08-18 | $706.33 | Price drift now glides instead of holding constant, so the model can carry a spike that is still running: prices rise into 2027, revenue peaks in fiscal 2028, and the reversion follows. Driven by the 2026 Q3 10-Q take-or-pay disclosure (ceiling near calendar Q2 2026 market price, floor through the term, floor-price gross margins above any past cycle peak) and by industry reporting that 2027 capacity is sold out. Terminal margins raised toward that floor: Cloud Memory 62%, Core Data Center 50%, Mobile and Client 40%. Capex intensity raised to match the ~$27B of 2026 capex the 10-Q guides to. Fiscal 2027 now lands at ~$233B against a street range of $225-240B, where the old model sat ~30% low. |