META · Forward model · Reality Labs
What has to happen in Reality Labs
Model as of
This page changes Reality Labs inside the complete META model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.
Shares this vertical and portfolio case. Slider and horizon edits stay in your browser.
Reality Labs
Basis quarter$431M
Final quarter$922M
Implied CAGR+16%
Final revenue mix1%
Quest headsets, Ray-Ban and Oakley Meta AI glasses, and the software and content around them. $431M of revenue against a $4.62B operating loss in 2026 Q2 - it is 0.7% of the company's revenue and about a quarter of its operating income burned. Glasses are growing; headsets are shrinking.
Last four quarters
2025 Q3
$470M
Reported
2025 Q4
$955M
Reported
2026 Q1
$402M
Reported
2026 Q2
$431M
Reported
AI glasses (Ray-Ban Meta, Oakley Meta)Quest headsetsContent, software and accessories
Sequential growth
+5.0%/qtr
decaying toward +3.0%
5% a quarter. AI glasses are growing and Quest is not; this is the net of the two.
Reality Labs
Latest: $922M (2031Q2E)
| Period | Value |
|---|---|
| 2025Q1 | $412M |
| 2025Q2 | $370M |
| 2025Q3 | $470M |
| 2025Q4 | $955M |
| 2026Q1 | $402M |
| 2026Q2 | $431M |
| 2026Q3E | $453M |
| 2026Q4E | $474M |
| 2027Q1E | $496M |
| 2027Q2E | $518M |
| 2027Q3E | $541M |
| 2027Q4E | $563M |
| 2028Q1E | $586M |
| 2028Q2E | $609M |
| 2028Q3E | $633M |
| 2028Q4E | $657M |
| 2029Q1E | $681M |
| 2029Q2E | $706M |
| 2029Q3E | $731M |
| 2029Q4E | $757M |
| 2030Q1E | $783M |
| 2030Q2E | $809M |
| 2030Q3E | $837M |
| 2030Q4E | $865M |
| 2031Q1E | $893M |
| 2031Q2E | $922M |
Assumptions & reasoning
- Carried as a growth rate rather than as units x price because Meta has never disclosed headset or glasses unit sales. A units model here would be two invented numbers multiplied together to reproduce a disclosed one.
- The line is heavily seasonal - Q4 2025 was $955M against $470M the quarter before - and a smooth quarterly growth rate deliberately does not reproduce that. Read the annual totals, not the individual quarters.
- The margin of -970% is not a typo: it is a $4.18B EBITDA loss on $431M of revenue, which is what the reported $4.62B operating loss looks like once an assumed share of depreciation is added back. Expressing it any other way would quietly delete $15B a year of real spending from the free cash flow.
- It glides toward -250%, so the loss stays roughly flat in dollars as revenue grows rather than shrinking - which is what management guided to when it said Reality Labs operating losses would remain similar to 2025 levels.
- This is the cleanest single lever in the model: a reader who believes Meta caps the burn can drag the terminal margin and watch what closing the loss is worth, without touching a single advertising assumption.