← META forward model

META · Forward model · Advertising · Bear case

What has to happen in Advertising

Model as of

This page changes Advertising inside the complete META model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.

META forward model
Horizon
Consolidated fair value $260.99 all other verticals held in this portfolio case
Final-quarter revenue $75.09B 93% of company revenue
Explicit segment contribution $64.08B EBITDA less segment capex, before corporate items

Monetisation growth mean-reverts as the AI ranking gains are lapped, ad load is already high and price per ad flattens. Regulatory losses land - the youth trials Meta flags as potentially material, plus European consent rules that cost impressions. Reality Labs keeps burning at today's rate without the revenue ever arriving, and neither AI line ever earns: businesses use free agents, and a Meta AI that has always been free inside WhatsApp turns out to be impossible to charge for. Capex is spent regardless.

Advertising

Basis quarter$59.36B
Final quarter$75.09B
Implied CAGR+5%
Final revenue mix93%

Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger and Threads sold to advertisers. 97.6% of company revenue and effectively all of the profit. The people are already there - 3.60 billion daily - so this line is a monetisation story, not a user-growth story: impressions up 14% and price per ad up 12% is what a 27% quarter is made of.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $50.08B Reported
2025 Q4 $58.14B Reported
2026 Q1 $55.02B Reported
2026 Q2 $59.36B Reported
Feed and Stories adsReels and video adsAdvantage+ / AI-ranked campaignsClick-to-message and business messaging ads
Subscribers 3.60B 64.3% of a 5.60B addressable base 3.60B family daily active people, June 2026 average, as disclosed. Up 3% year over year.
Addressable subscribers 5.60B the S-curve ceiling 5.6B people online and over 13. The audience ceiling is the connected population, not the app store.
Net adds 0/qtr ramping toward 0/qtr, throttled as the base approaches the TAM
Net-add ceiling 0/qtr what supply can deliver at full rate
ARPU $5.50/mo drifting +2.5% per quarter, floor $0.00 $5.50 a month, $59.36B of ad revenue over 3.60B people. Derived, not disclosed.
Non-subscriber revenue $0/qtr growing 0.0% per quarter Zero: Other revenue is its own vertical, so this line is advertising alone.
Advertising

Latest: $75.09B (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2025Q1 $41.39B
2025Q2 $46.56B
2025Q3 $50.08B
2025Q4 $58.14B
2026Q1 $55.02B
2026Q2 $59.36B
2026Q3E $60.19B
2026Q4E $60.98B
2027Q1E $61.77B
2027Q2E $62.56B
2027Q3E $63.35B
2027Q4E $64.13B
2028Q1E $64.91B
2028Q2E $65.70B
2028Q3E $66.48B
2028Q4E $67.26B
2029Q1E $68.04B
2029Q2E $68.82B
2029Q3E $69.60B
2029Q4E $70.38B
2030Q1E $71.17B
2030Q2E $71.95B
2030Q3E $72.73B
2030Q4E $73.52B
2031Q1E $74.31B
2031Q2E $75.09B

Assumptions & reasoning

  • Modelled as daily active people x revenue per person rather than as a growth rate, because the two halves move at completely different speeds: the audience grew 3% year over year and revenue grew 27%. A single growth number would hide that every dollar of upside here is price, not people.
  • Revenue per person is derived from two disclosed numbers - $59,363M of advertising revenue over 3.60 billion daily active people - and is $5.50 a month. It is not a metric Meta publishes, and it moves with ad load, auction density and mix, not with a price list.
  • The 2.5% quarterly drift on revenue per person is a deliberate deceleration: it compounds to about 10% a year against the 23% this line just ran. Holding today's monetisation growth for five years is the single easiest way to make this model say anything you like, so it is not held.
  • The first projected quarter lands at about $61B, inside the company's own $61-64B guidance for Q3 2026, which is the only near-term check available on this line.
  • Capex intensity starts at 70% of this segment's revenue and glides to 22%. That is not a guess: $50.9B was already spent in the first half against $130-145B of full-year guidance, which leaves about 68% of revenue a quarter for the back half. Almost all of it is AI infrastructure serving ranking, recommendation and generative ads, so it is charged here rather than spread evenly.
  • The driver grows smoothly and Meta does not: advertising is seasonally strongest in Q4 and weakest in Q1, so individual projected quarters are wrong in a way that cancels over a year. Read the annual totals, not the Q4 line.
  • The EBITDA margin of 50% is struck on a quarter carrying a $2.40B legal charge and $1.18B of severance; underlying is nearer 54%. It glides to 56% as those roll off and the infrastructure scales, which is the assumption most worth arguing with given depreciation is compounding behind it.
META model map

Explore another vertical