← GEV forward model

GEV · Forward model · Wind · Bull case

What has to happen in Wind

Model as of

This page changes Wind inside the complete GEV model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.

GEV forward model
Horizon
Consolidated fair value $1,049.79 all other verticals held in this portfolio case
Final-quarter revenue $1.75B 9% of company revenue
Explicit segment contribution $1.29B EBITDA less segment capex, before corporate items

The order book keeps compounding, the ramp is pulled forward, Power and Electrification reach their 22% margins on schedule and the multiple holds at 22x. The evidence is the rate of change: gas equipment under contract went from 100 GW to 116 GW in a single quarter, the year-end 2026 target was raised from 110 GW to 125 GW in three months, and Electrification data-centre orders passed $5bn in the first half, more than double all of 2025. Fair value $1,049.79, 16.8% above the traded price - this is the only case in the model that justifies the current price, and it needs both the growth and the multiple.

Wind

Basis quarter$2.03B
Final quarter$1.75B
Implied CAGR−3%
Final revenue mix9%

Onshore and offshore wind turbines and their services. This is the segment the company is deliberately shrinking: orders fell 40% organically in the basis quarter, revenue is guided down low-double digits for 2026, and every reported quarter but one has lost money at the segment line.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $2.65B Reported
2025 Q4 $2.37B Reported
2026 Q1 $1.43B Reported
2026 Q2 $2.03B Reported
Onshore Wind equipmentOnshore Wind servicesOffshore Wind
Sequential growth −5.7%/qtr decaying toward +0.5% Deseasonalised trend landing 2026 revenue 11% below 2025, inside guided low-double digits.
Wind

Latest: $1.75B (2031Q2E)

Period Value
2024Q2 $2.06B
2024Q3 $2.89B
2024Q4 $3.11B
2025Q1 $1.85B
2025Q2 $2.25B
2025Q3 $2.65B
2025Q4 $2.37B
2026Q1 $1.43B
2026Q2 $2.03B
2026Q3E $2.42B
2026Q4E $2.29B
2027Q1E $1.40B
2027Q2E $1.74B
2027Q3E $2.14B
2027Q4E $2.08B
2028Q1E $1.30B
2028Q2E $1.65B
2028Q3E $2.07B
2028Q4E $2.03B
2029Q1E $1.29B
2029Q2E $1.65B
2029Q3E $2.08B
2029Q4E $2.06B
2030Q1E $1.31B
2030Q2E $1.69B
2030Q3E $2.14B
2030Q4E $2.13B
2031Q1E $1.36B
2031Q2E $1.75B

Assumptions & reasoning

  • This is the one place the model knowingly sits BELOW guidance. Management guides 2026 Wind segment EBITDA losses of about $400m, but the first half alone lost $657m, so the guide implies roughly +$257m of profit in the second half - a swing from the basis quarter's (13.6)% margin to about +5.5% in two quarters. A monotone glide can only reproduce that at a rate near 0.9, which would reach the 2028 terminal margin two years early and overstate Wind for the rest of the horizon.
  • The 0.45 glide used here instead produces about $(0.8)bn of 2026 Wind segment EBITDA against the guided $(0.4)bn, and reaches the disclosed 6% margin during 2028 rather than in 2026. The model is therefore deliberately more conservative than management on this segment, by roughly 0.8% of company revenue.
  • Wind carries the strongest seasonality of the three segments and the most convincing evidence for it: the first-quarter trough replicates almost exactly across both observable years, at 59.5% of the prior fourth quarter in 2025 and 60.5% in 2026.
GEV model map

Explore another vertical