DDOG · Forward model · Bull case
The Bull case, 20 quarters out
Model as of
Each segment is projected from its own operating driver, rolled up into consolidated cash flow, and discounted back to a fair value per share. The assumptions below are editable — change them and every number on this page moves with them.
Datadog reports one operating and reportable segment, so this model uses the only revenue disaggregation it discloses: North America and International, which foot to reported revenue to the dollar in all six directly filed quarters and to within $4 thousand in the two fourth quarters that are derived as the fiscal year less the nine months. Nothing is split by product, because no product-line revenue is disclosed; nothing is built off total ARR, because Datadog never publishes one. Both verticals carry the consolidated cost structure - the chief operating decision maker reviews consolidated net income and no geographic profitability exists - and this is stated openly rather than dressed as a geographic insight. The projected margin is calibrated to cash rather than to GAAP: the basis-quarter inputs reproduce the house free-cash-flow margin of 27.3% ($306.0 million on $1,121.5 million, operating cash flow less purchases of property and equipment), which is $27.3 million above Datadog's own free-cash-flow definition because the company also deducts capitalised software. Corporate overhead is the disclosed general and administrative line at 7.7% of revenue; capex intensity is management's guided 4-5% of revenue for capex and capitalised software together, taken at the 4.5% midpoint; the tax rate is Datadog's stated 21% long-term projected rate. The one-off step in the North America driver is this model's calibration of a disclosed but unsized event - the largest customer's usage reduction, in a company that reports no customer at or above 10% of revenue - and the choice to put it in North America rather than International is inference from the growth-rate fingerprint, not disclosure. The exit multiple is the largest single lever and is an assumption: no peer multiple was independently verified.
Shares this page's scenario. Driver and horizon edits stay in your browser — the recipient sees the published model.
Latest: $3.27B (2031Q2E)
| Period | Value |
|---|---|
| 2024Q3 | $690M |
| 2024Q4 | $738M |
| 2025Q1 | $762M |
| 2025Q2 | $827M |
| 2025Q3 | $886M |
| 2025Q4 | $953M |
| 2026Q1 | $1.01B |
| 2026Q2 | $1.12B |
| 2026Q3E | $1.15B |
| 2026Q4E | $1.22B |
| 2027Q1E | $1.26B |
| 2027Q2E | $1.37B |
| 2027Q3E | $1.44B |
| 2027Q4E | $1.53B |
| 2028Q1E | $1.57B |
| 2028Q2E | $1.71B |
| 2028Q3E | $1.80B |
| 2028Q4E | $1.90B |
| 2029Q1E | $1.96B |
| 2029Q2E | $2.12B |
| 2029Q3E | $2.23B |
| 2029Q4E | $2.36B |
| 2030Q1E | $2.43B |
| 2030Q2E | $2.64B |
| 2030Q3E | $2.77B |
| 2030Q4E | $2.93B |
| 2031Q1E | $3.02B |
| 2031Q2E | $3.27B |
Where each case comes from
Bear case — primary sources
The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bear column is what happens if they are taken at face value.
Bull case — primary sources
The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bull column is what happens if they are taken at face value.
The contracted book at 30 June 2026
- Aug 6, 2026 the aggregate transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations was $3,471.4 million... the Company expects to recognize substantially all of the remaining performance obligations over the next 24 months
- Aug 8, 2025 the aggregate transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations was $2,425.8 million
Pomel case — primary sources
The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Pomel column is what happens if they are taken at face value.
What management said about the largest customer
The guide this team beat one quarter earlier
From cash flow to fair value
| Present value of free cash flow, 20 quarters | $10.59B |
| Terminal-year revenue | $12.00B |
| Terminal-year EBITDA | $5.83B |
| Exit multiple, on revenue | 12.0x |
| Terminal value | $143.97B |
| Discounted at 9.0% a year, terminal value becomes | $93.57B |
| Share of enterprise value from the terminal | 90% |
| Enterprise value | $104.16B |
| Net cash | $3.99B |
| Equity value | $108.14B |
| Shares | 0.36B |
| Fair value per share | $301.17 |
| Against the deployed price of $212.93, as of | +41% |
10% on a profitable software business with $4.0 billion of net cash, no financing need and $1.0 billion of zero-coupon converts due 2029. 8x exit revenue is a mature-SaaS multiple for a line fading toward mid-teens growth by 2031; the shares trade at 17.4x FY2026 guided revenue today, and that multiple cannot survive the fade. No peer multiple was independently verified in the research pass, so the exit multiple is anchored on Datadog's own compression rather than on an asserted comp set - it is the single largest lever in this model.
Read the other way round: at $212.93 the market is paying 7.9x terminal-year revenue, holding every other assumption on this page fixed. That is the number to argue about.
The projected path
| Quarter | North America | International | Revenue | YoY | EBITDA | Capex | FCF | R40 | PV of FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q3E | $839M | $315M | $1.15B | +30% | $503M | $52M | $356M | +61 | $349M |
| 2026 Q4E | $879M | $344M | $1.22B | +28% | $539M | $55M | $383M | +60 | $366M |
| 2027 Q1E | $906M | $356M | $1.26B | +25% | $562M | $57M | $399M | +57 | $374M |
| 2027 Q2E | $994M | $376M | $1.37B | +22% | $617M | $62M | $438M | +54 | $402M |
| 2027 Q3E | $1.05B | $398M | $1.44B | +25% | $655M | $65M | $466M | +57 | $419M |
| 2027 Q4E | $1.09B | $433M | $1.53B | +25% | $699M | $69M | $498M | +58 | $438M |
| 2028 Q1E | $1.13B | $446M | $1.57B | +25% | $726M | $71M | $518M | +58 | $445M |
| 2028 Q2E | $1.24B | $471M | $1.71B | +25% | $793M | $77M | $566M | +58 | $476M |
| 2028 Q3E | $1.30B | $497M | $1.80B | +25% | $840M | $81M | $600M | +58 | $494M |
| 2028 Q4E | $1.36B | $539M | $1.90B | +25% | $894M | $86M | $639M | +58 | $515M |
| 2029 Q1E | $1.40B | $555M | $1.96B | +24% | $926M | $88M | $662M | +58 | $522M |
| 2029 Q2E | $1.54B | $585M | $2.12B | +24% | $1.01B | $96M | $721M | +58 | $557M |
| 2029 Q3E | $1.62B | $616M | $2.23B | +24% | $1.07B | $101M | $763M | +58 | $576M |
| 2029 Q4E | $1.70B | $668M | $2.36B | +24% | $1.13B | $106M | $810M | +59 | $599M |
| 2030 Q1E | $1.75B | $686M | $2.43B | +24% | $1.17B | $109M | $837M | +59 | $606M |
| 2030 Q2E | $1.92B | $722M | $2.64B | +24% | $1.27B | $119M | $911M | +59 | $646M |
| 2030 Q3E | $2.01B | $760M | $2.77B | +24% | $1.34B | $125M | $962M | +59 | $667M |
| 2030 Q4E | $2.11B | $823M | $2.93B | +24% | $1.42B | $132M | $1.02B | +59 | $692M |
| 2031 Q1E | $2.17B | $845M | $3.02B | +24% | $1.47B | $136M | $1.05B | +59 | $699M |
| 2031 Q2E | $2.38B | $889M | $3.27B | +24% | $1.60B | $147M | $1.14B | +59 | $744M |
Every row is projected. A year-over-year change is shown only where the quarter it compares against exists — an em dash means there is no comparable quarter, not a flat year.
Model revisions
Assumptions are marked to reality as each quarter prints. Every change is appended here, with the fair value the model produced at the time, so the model's own history stays visible.
| Date | Fair value then | Note |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-27 | $155.50 | First publication, off the Q2 2026 print of 6 August 2026. Two verticals - the only disclosed revenue split - with the largest customer's usage reduction carried as a one-off step to the North America run rate so the guided Q3 and FY2026 revenue both reconcile. |