← Cerebras Systems Inc.

CBRS · Forward model · Bear case

The Bear case, 18 quarters out

Model as of

Each segment is projected from its own operating driver, rolled up into consolidated cash flow, and discounted back to a fair value per share. The assumptions below are editable — change them and every number on this page moves with them.

Built on GAAP. Cerebras reports one segment; the two lines here are the disaggregation of revenue shown on the face of the statements of operations every quarter, and they reconcile to reported consolidated revenue with zero difference in all ten quarters, from $66.6M in 2024 Q1 to $180.1M in 2026 Q2. Only 2026 Q1 is estimated, and it is confirmed twice: six-month less June-quarter arithmetic and the Q1 release's own $110.6M and $82.8M. Nothing else is apportioned. All company guidance is non-GAAP core and core revenue exceeded GAAP revenue by $29.8M in the basis quarter, so every guided figure used here was converted through the disclosed bridge - GAAP equals core plus pass-through less customer-warrant amortisation, which was $44.3M in the June quarter and is expected in a $40-55M quarterly band. What is ours and not the company's: the growth rates and their decay, both margin glides, the capex glide, corporate overhead, the tax rate, the discount rate and the exit multiple. Three choices need stating plainly. First, corporate overhead is a single 20% of revenue for the whole horizon because the engine has no overhead glide; that reproduces roughly today's $118.8M of quarterly core operating expense at 2027 revenue, but it understates the 2026 loss, where actual core opex is 57% of core revenue. Second, valuation uses the 237,564,041 shares outstanding at 2026-08-05 and holds them flat, so the 76.0M of disclosed potential shares - 32% more - are charged nowhere. Third, the September quarter projects high: guidance implies core revenue only 2.4% above June and then a 25% step in December as capacity tranches go live, and a single decaying growth rate cannot be flat and then step, so this model is calibrated to the annual totals instead: the September quarter projects $253M against a GAAP-equivalent guide of about $190M, while FY2026 lands at $970M against a core guide midpoint of $885M. The 2026 Q2 GAAP net loss of $450.5M is dominated by $377.0M of IPO-triggered stock compensation and is not a run rate; adjusted EBITDA was $(53.1)M. Net cash of $7.69bn is cash, restricted cash and investments of $8.61bn less the $918.2M Working Capital Loan; it includes $684.7M of restricted cash and excludes $568.8M of on-balance-sheet operating lease liabilities and about $1.5bn of undiscounted payments on datacentre leases not yet commenced. This model burns about $1.7bn of cumulative free cash flow and spends $9.7bn of capex over the horizon, and charges no interest, no stock compensation and no dilution against any of it.

CBRS forward model
Horizon
Fair value per share $56.62 −68% against $177.65
Terminal-year revenue $4.81B last four projected quarters
Enterprise value $5.76B −$2.40B explicit + $8.17B terminal

The build lands and the revenue does not follow on schedule. The June quarter is the existence proof: $416.9M of capex against $180.1M of revenue, a 14.2% GAAP gross margin and cloud cost of revenue up 313% year over year against cloud revenue up 281%. The contractual asymmetry makes a slow quarter worse than a slow quarter. If Cerebras misses a capacity tranche or a service level, OpenAI can terminate part or all of the MRA, and the $25.4bn of remaining performance obligations is that agreement; termination also puts the $1.0bn Working Capital Loan on demand. With 76% of revenue in three customers this is a single-counterparty event, not a diversified miss. Here the 2027 tripling does not happen, the margin glide stalls near today's core level and the multiple compresses to the 3.0x carried by the leased build-out comparable.

CBRS REVENUE MODEL

Latest: $1.22B (2030Q4E)

Period Value
2024Q1 $67M
2024Q2 $70M
2024Q3 $72M
2024Q4 $82M
2025Q1 $100M
2025Q2 $103M
2025Q3 $136M
2025Q4 $171M
2026Q1 $193M
2026Q2 $180M
2026Q3E $245M
2026Q4E $323M
2027Q1E $412M
2027Q2E $506M
2027Q3E $603M
2027Q4E $696M
2028Q1E $784M
2028Q2E $865M
2028Q3E $936M
2028Q4E $998M
2029Q1E $1.05B
2029Q2E $1.09B
2029Q3E $1.13B
2029Q4E $1.16B
2030Q1E $1.18B
2030Q2E $1.20B
2030Q3E $1.21B
2030Q4E $1.22B
Scenarios

Where each case comes from

Valuation

From cash flow to fair value

The published model, discounted at 13.5% a year with an exit multiple of 3.0x on revenue. The horizon and sliders above do not change this walk.

Present value of free cash flow, 18 quarters−$2.40B
Terminal-year revenue$4.81B
Terminal-year EBITDA$1.50B
Exit multiple, on revenue3.0x
Terminal value$14.44B
Discounted at 13.5% a year, terminal value becomes$8.17B
Share of enterprise value from the terminal142%
Enterprise value$5.76B
Net cash$7.69B
Equity value$13.45B
Shares0.24B
Fair value per share$56.62
Against the deployed price of $177.65, as of −68%

Both inputs are assumptions and neither is disclosed. 13.5% prices a pre-profit business with 76% of revenue in three customers and a build funded ahead of the revenue that serves it. The exit multiple carries most of the value, because at the 2026-08-24 close of $185.43 the enterprise value of roughly $36.4bn is already 41x the midpoint of the company's own FY2026 core revenue guide and about 14x a 2027 revenue equal to exactly three times that midpoint - so the stock is a bet on the years after the guide. 6.0x the terminal year is defensible against the steady state this model actually reaches: 60% segment margin less 20% overhead less capex that has fallen to 29% of revenue is a high-single-digit free-cash-flow margin in 2030, and the multiple prices the replacement-capex business beyond it rather than the terminal quarter. CoreWeave, the closest listed comparable in this repo, carries 3.0x - but it is a leased, debt-financed fleet with $29.5bn of net debt, where Cerebras is net cash $7.7bn and owns its silicon.

Read the other way round: at $177.65 the market is paying 13.6x terminal-year revenue, holding every other assumption on this page fixed. That is the number to argue about.

Quarter by quarter

The projected path

The published model's 18 quarters. The horizon and sliders above do not change this table.

Quarter HardwareCloud and other services Revenue YoY EBITDA Capex FCF R40 PV of FCF
2026 Q3E $56M$189M $245M +81% $38M $290M −$252M −22 −$244M
2026 Q4E $57M$266M $323M +89% $57M $346M −$289M −1 −$271M
2027 Q1E $58M$354M $412M +113% $81M $393M −$312M +37 −$283M
2027 Q2E $59M$448M $506M +181% $108M $427M −$319M +118 −$281M
2027 Q3E $59M$543M $603M +146% $138M $450M −$312M +94 −$266M
2027 Q4E $60M$637M $696M +115% $169M $461M −$292M +73 −$242M
2028 Q1E $60M$725M $784M +90% $199M $463M −$264M +57 −$211M
2028 Q2E $60M$805M $865M +71% $228M $458M −$230M +44 −$178M
2028 Q3E $60M$876M $936M +55% $255M $448M −$193M +35 −$145M
2028 Q4E $60M$938M $998M +43% $280M $436M −$156M +28 −$114M
2029 Q1E $60M$991M $1.05B +34% $302M $423M −$121M +22 −$85M
2029 Q2E $59M$1.03B $1.09B +27% $321M $409M −$88M +19 −$60M
2029 Q3E $59M$1.07B $1.13B +21% $337M $395M −$58M +16 −$38M
2029 Q4E $59M$1.10B $1.16B +16% $351M $383M −$31M +13 −$20M
2030 Q1E $58M$1.12B $1.18B +12% $363M $371M −$8M +12 −$5M
2030 Q2E $58M$1.14B $1.20B +10% $373M $361M $10M +10 $6M
2030 Q3E $58M$1.15B $1.21B +7% $381M $352M $25M +9 $14M
2030 Q4E $57M$1.16B $1.22B +5% $387M $343M $37M +8 $21M

Every row is projected. A year-over-year change is shown only where the quarter it compares against exists — an em dash means there is no comparable quarter, not a flat year.

Track record

Model revisions

Assumptions are marked to reality as each quarter prints. Every change is appended here, with the fair value the model produced at the time, so the model's own history stays visible.

DateFair value thenNote
2026-08-27 $139.08 First build, on the 2026 Q2 basis. Calibrated to the raised FY2026 core guide and the 2027 tripling converted to GAAP through the disclosed warrant and pass-through bridge, with the decay shaped by the two buckets of the $25.4bn RPO schedule.