← CBRS forward model

CBRS · Forward model · Hardware · Bear case

What has to happen in Hardware

Model as of

This page changes Hardware inside the complete CBRS model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.

CBRS forward model
Horizon
Consolidated fair value $56.62 all other verticals held in this portfolio case
Final-quarter revenue $57M 5% of company revenue
Explicit segment contribution $294M EBITDA less segment capex, before corporate items

The build lands and the revenue does not follow on schedule. The June quarter is the existence proof: $416.9M of capex against $180.1M of revenue, a 14.2% GAAP gross margin and cloud cost of revenue up 313% year over year against cloud revenue up 281%. The contractual asymmetry makes a slow quarter worse than a slow quarter. If Cerebras misses a capacity tranche or a service level, OpenAI can terminate part or all of the MRA, and the $25.4bn of remaining performance obligations is that agreement; termination also puts the $1.0bn Working Capital Loan on demand. With 76% of revenue in three customers this is a single-counterparty event, not a diversified miss. Here the 2027 tripling does not happen, the margin glide stalls near today's core level and the multiple compresses to the 3.0x carried by the leased build-out comparable.

Hardware

Basis quarter$54M
Final quarter$57M
Implied CAGR+1%
Final revenue mix5%

Racked CS-series wafer-scale systems sold to customers who run them on their own premises, recognised at a point in time on delivery. This was the whole company until 2025 and is now the minority line: $54.1M of GAAP revenue in 2026 Q2 against $126.0M of cloud. The CS-4 was announced in August 2026 with first shipments in the September quarter and manufacturing capacity is guided to rise more than 10x in 2026 across Flex, Sanmina and Rocket EMS. No filing discloses system units or an average selling price, so the line cannot be driven by volume and price; it is modelled as a growth line off the reported base.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $97M Reported
2025 Q4 $122M Reported
2026 Q1 $111M Estimated
2026 Q2 $54M Reported
CS-series system salesSupport and warranty on delivered systems
Sequential growth +6.0%/qtr decaying toward +2.0% 6% a quarter off a $54.1M GAAP print carrying $28.0M of warrant contra-revenue. Core hardware was +16.8% YoY.
Hardware

Latest: $57M (2030Q4E)

Period Value
2024Q1 $49M
2024Q2 $55M
2024Q3 $50M
2024Q4 $57M
2025Q1 $70M
2025Q2 $70M
2025Q3 $97M
2025Q4 $122M
2026Q1 $111M
2026Q2 $54M
2026Q3E $56M
2026Q4E $57M
2027Q1E $58M
2027Q2E $59M
2027Q3E $59M
2027Q4E $60M
2028Q1E $60M
2028Q2E $60M
2028Q3E $60M
2028Q4E $60M
2029Q1E $60M
2029Q2E $59M
2029Q3E $59M
2029Q4E $59M
2030Q1E $58M
2030Q2E $58M
2030Q3E $58M
2030Q4E $57M

Assumptions & reasoning

  • Ten quarters of disclosed revenue and cost of revenue, unusually complete for a company two quarters public, because the IPO prospectus carried an eight-quarter Quarterly Results of Operations table covering 2024 Q1 to 2025 Q4.
  • 2026 Q1 is the only estimated point: six-month hardware revenue less the reported June quarter gives $110,593K, and the Q1 2026 release independently states hardware revenue of $110.6 million.
  • The 1.8% GAAP gross margin in the basis quarter is not an operating result. $28.0M of customer-warrant amortisation is charged against this line as contra-revenue; core hardware gross margin was 38.8%, which is what the segment margin here is set to.
  • Warrant amortisation runs through October 2031 and is recognised in proportion to related revenue, so GAAP hardware revenue understates the commercial line by roughly a third at current scale and the understatement back-loads.
  • Point-in-time recognition makes this line genuinely lumpy: sequential moves of -51%, +38% and +26% all appear in the last six quarters, and management said on 2026-08-12 that it manages total core revenue rather than the mix between the two lines.
  • No seasonality array is set. Detrended factors from a centred four-quarter moving average put the Q4 factor at 1.101 with a window-to-window spread of 0.287, so the spread beats the signal and the naive and detrended estimators disagree in sign on Q1.
CBRS model map

Explore another vertical