← Cerebras Systems Inc.

CBRS · Forward model · Feldman case

The Feldman case, 18 quarters out

Each segment is projected from its own operating driver, rolled up into consolidated cash flow, and discounted back to a fair value per share. The assumptions below are editable — change them and every number on this page moves with them.

Built on GAAP. Cerebras reports one segment; the two lines here are the disaggregation of revenue shown on the face of the statements of operations every quarter, and they reconcile to reported consolidated revenue with zero difference in all ten quarters, from $66.6M in 2024 Q1 to $180.1M in 2026 Q2. Only 2026 Q1 is estimated, and it is confirmed twice: six-month less June-quarter arithmetic and the Q1 release's own $110.6M and $82.8M. Nothing else is apportioned. All company guidance is non-GAAP core and core revenue exceeded GAAP revenue by $29.8M in the basis quarter, so every guided figure used here was converted through the disclosed bridge - GAAP equals core plus pass-through less customer-warrant amortisation, which was $44.3M in the June quarter and is expected in a $40-55M quarterly band. What is ours and not the company's: the growth rates and their decay, both margin glides, the capex glide, corporate overhead, the tax rate, the discount rate and the exit multiple. Three choices need stating plainly. First, corporate overhead is a single 20% of revenue for the whole horizon because the engine has no overhead glide; that reproduces roughly today's $118.8M of quarterly core operating expense at 2027 revenue, but it understates the 2026 loss, where actual core opex is 57% of core revenue. Second, valuation uses the 237,564,041 shares outstanding at 2026-08-05 and holds them flat, so the 76.0M of disclosed potential shares - 32% more - are charged nowhere. Third, the September quarter projects high: guidance implies core revenue only 2.4% above June and then a 25% step in December as capacity tranches go live, and a single decaying growth rate cannot be flat and then step, so this model is calibrated to the annual totals instead: the September quarter projects $253M against a GAAP-equivalent guide of about $190M, while FY2026 lands at $970M against a core guide midpoint of $885M. The 2026 Q2 GAAP net loss of $450.5M is dominated by $377.0M of IPO-triggered stock compensation and is not a run rate; adjusted EBITDA was $(53.1)M. Net cash of $7.69bn is cash, restricted cash and investments of $8.61bn less the $918.2M Working Capital Loan; it includes $684.7M of restricted cash and excludes $568.8M of on-balance-sheet operating lease liabilities and about $1.5bn of undiscounted payments on datacentre leases not yet commenced. This model burns about $1.7bn of cumulative free cash flow and spends $9.7bn of capex over the horizon, and charges no interest, no stock compensation and no dilution against any of it.

The CEO's own forward statement run to the end of the horizon rather than to 2027. On 2026-08-12 Andrew Feldman said Cerebras expects to more than triple core revenue in 2027 and continue to grow at multiples in the years following, which is a claim about the shape of the whole period. The physical backing he cited in the same call is more than 600 megawatts secured in seven months across Alabama, Dallas, Denver, Minneapolis, Santa Clara, Stockton, France, Finland, Manitoba, Montreal, Norway, Saskatchewan and Toronto, a pipeline to gigawatts, manufacturing capacity up more than 10x in 2026 and secured TSMC wafer supply. So this case holds a much higher terminal growth rate rather than merely tilting the ramp, and reaches the 60%-plus margin target early. It is the most aggressive case any primary source supports, and it does not clear the two things that make it a case rather than a forecast: the book is one counterparty and the extra 1.25GW is an option Cerebras does not control.

CBRS REVENUE MODEL

Latest: $4.76B (2030Q4E)

Period Value
2024Q1 $67M
2024Q2 $70M
2024Q3 $72M
2024Q4 $82M
2025Q1 $100M
2025Q2 $103M
2025Q3 $136M
2025Q4 $171M
2026Q1 $193M
2026Q2 $180M
2026Q3E $258M
2026Q4E $359M
2027Q1E $486M
2027Q2E $638M
2027Q3E $813M
2027Q4E $1.01B
2028Q1E $1.22B
2028Q2E $1.46B
2028Q3E $1.71B
2028Q4E $1.97B
2029Q1E $2.25B
2029Q2E $2.55B
2029Q3E $2.87B
2029Q4E $3.20B
2030Q1E $3.55B
2030Q2E $3.93B
2030Q3E $4.33B
2030Q4E $4.76B

What drives each segment

Hardware

Growth path
Basis quarter$54M
Final quarter$221M
Implied CAGR+37%
Share of revenue, final quarter5%
PV of segment cash flow$820M

Racked CS-series wafer-scale systems sold to customers who run them on their own premises, recognised at a point in time on delivery. This was the whole company until 2025 and is now the minority line: $54.1M of GAAP revenue in 2026 Q2 against $126.0M of cloud. The CS-4 was announced in August 2026 with first shipments in the September quarter and manufacturing capacity is guided to rise more than 10x in 2026 across Flex, Sanmina and Rocket EMS. No filing discloses system units or an average selling price, so the line cannot be driven by volume and price; it is modelled as a growth line off the reported base.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $97M Reported
2025 Q4 $122M Reported
2026 Q1 $111M Estimated
2026 Q2 $54M Reported
CS-series system salesSupport and warranty on delivered systems
Sequential growth +6.0%/qtr decaying toward +2.0% 6% a quarter off a $54.1M GAAP print carrying $28.0M of warrant contra-revenue. Core hardware was +16.8% YoY.
Hardware

Latest: $221M (2030Q4E)

Period Value
2024Q1 $49M
2024Q2 $55M
2024Q3 $50M
2024Q4 $57M
2025Q1 $70M
2025Q2 $70M
2025Q3 $97M
2025Q4 $122M
2026Q1 $111M
2026Q2 $54M
2026Q3E $59M
2026Q4E $63M
2027Q1E $68M
2027Q2E $74M
2027Q3E $80M
2027Q4E $86M
2028Q1E $93M
2028Q2E $101M
2028Q3E $109M
2028Q4E $118M
2029Q1E $128M
2029Q2E $138M
2029Q3E $149M
2029Q4E $161M
2030Q1E $175M
2030Q2E $189M
2030Q3E $204M
2030Q4E $221M

Assumptions & reasoning

  • Ten quarters of disclosed revenue and cost of revenue, unusually complete for a company two quarters public, because the IPO prospectus carried an eight-quarter Quarterly Results of Operations table covering 2024 Q1 to 2025 Q4.
  • 2026 Q1 is the only estimated point: six-month hardware revenue less the reported June quarter gives $110,593K, and the Q1 2026 release independently states hardware revenue of $110.6 million.
  • The 1.8% GAAP gross margin in the basis quarter is not an operating result. $28.0M of customer-warrant amortisation is charged against this line as contra-revenue; core hardware gross margin was 38.8%, which is what the segment margin here is set to.
  • Warrant amortisation runs through October 2031 and is recognised in proportion to related revenue, so GAAP hardware revenue understates the commercial line by roughly a third at current scale and the understatement back-loads.
  • Point-in-time recognition makes this line genuinely lumpy: sequential moves of -51%, +38% and +26% all appear in the last six quarters, and management said on 2026-08-12 that it manages total core revenue rather than the mix between the two lines.
  • No seasonality array is set. Detrended factors from a centred four-quarter moving average put the Q4 factor at 1.101 with a window-to-window spread of 0.287, so the spread beats the signal and the naive and detrended estimators disagree in sign on Q1.

Cloud and other services

Growth path
Basis quarter$126M
Final quarter$4.54B
Implied CAGR+122%
Share of revenue, final quarter95%
PV of segment cash flow$4.30B

The inference service, and now the company. Cerebras contracts multi-year datacentre capacity, leases and fits out the sites, installs its own systems and recognises revenue over time as capacity is delivered and consumed: $125.6M of the quarter's $126.0M was over-time revenue. The line grew 281% year over year on GAAP and is 70% of consolidated revenue. Economically this is a capacity business, but live megawatts, revenue per megawatt and utilisation are all undisclosed - the only capacity figure given is a combined 'more than 600 megawatts of data center capacity that is either live now or will be delivered by the end of 2027' - so it is driven as a growth line anchored to the disclosed $25.4bn RPO recognition schedule rather than on an invented earning base.

Last four quarters
2025 Q3 $39M Reported
2025 Q4 $50M Reported
2026 Q1 $83M Estimated
2026 Q2 $126M Reported
Contracted inference capacity (OpenAI MRA and other capacity agreements)On-demand and enterprise inferenceDatacentre pass-through billings (zero-margin, excluded from core revenue)
Sequential growth +55.0%/qtr decaying toward +2.5% 55% a quarter: the rate that lands FY2027 near the guided tripling of the FY2026 core base of $880-890M.
Cloud and other services

Latest: $4.54B (2030Q4E)

Period Value
2024Q1 $17M
2024Q2 $15M
2024Q3 $22M
2024Q4 $24M
2025Q1 $30M
2025Q2 $33M
2025Q3 $39M
2025Q4 $50M
2026Q1 $83M
2026Q2 $126M
2026Q3E $199M
2026Q4E $296M
2027Q1E $418M
2027Q2E $564M
2027Q3E $733M
2027Q4E $922M
2028Q1E $1.13B
2028Q2E $1.36B
2028Q3E $1.60B
2028Q4E $1.85B
2029Q1E $2.13B
2029Q2E $2.41B
2029Q3E $2.72B
2029Q4E $3.04B
2030Q1E $3.38B
2030Q2E $3.74B
2030Q3E $4.13B
2030Q4E $4.54B

Assumptions & reasoning

  • Cost of revenue on this line went from $24.6M to $101.4M year over year while revenue went from $33.0M to $126.0M. The cost curve is tracking capacity rather than consumption, which is what a build-ahead looks like.
  • $14.5M of the quarter's revenue is zero-margin datacentre pass-through billed on behalf of specific customers. It is excluded from core revenue and it is why the GAAP cloud gross margin reads 19.5% against a core cloud gross margin of 41.8%.
  • The segment margin starts at the 41.8% core cloud gross margin rather than the 19.5% GAAP figure, and glides toward 62% - just above the 60%-plus core gross margin target the CFO stated on the call, which is a target for the consolidated company and not guidance.
  • Capex intensity starts at 180% of this line's revenue. Trailing-twelve-month capex of $746.5M was 251% of trailing cloud revenue and the June quarter alone spent $416.9M, so 180% is already a step down from the current build rate.
  • $1.5bn of undiscounted future minimum lease payments on datacentre leases executed in the June quarter had not commenced at 2026-06-30 and sit off the balance sheet. They will land in cost of revenue as the capacity goes live, which is more cost arriving before its revenue.
  • No seasonality array is set. Removing the trend with a centred four-quarter moving average does not shrink the Q4 factor, it inverts it, from a naive 1.273 to a detrended 0.879, and the window-to-window spread of 0.172 exceeds the signal of 0.121.
  • The $25.4bn RPO is consolidated, includes variable pass-through consideration and cannot be split between the two lines, so it is used to shape this driver's decay and to anchor the Bull case, never as a cloud-only backlog.
Scenarios

Where each case comes from

Valuation

From cash flow to fair value

Present value of free cash flow, 18 quarters-$194M
Terminal-year revenue$16.57B
Terminal-year EBITDA$7.50B
Exit multiple, on revenue8.0x
Terminal value$132.57B
Discounted at 13.5% a year, terminal value becomes$74.98B
Enterprise value$74.79B
Net cash$7.69B
Equity value$82.47B
Shares0.24B
Fair value per share$347.17
Against the current price of $186.67+86%

Both inputs are assumptions and neither is disclosed. 13.5% prices a pre-profit business with 76% of revenue in three customers and a build funded ahead of the revenue that serves it. The exit multiple carries most of the value, because at the 2026-08-24 close of $185.43 the enterprise value of roughly $36.4bn is already 41x the midpoint of the company's own FY2026 core revenue guide and about 14x a 2027 revenue equal to exactly three times that midpoint - so the stock is a bet on the years after the guide. 6.0x the terminal year is defensible against the steady state this model actually reaches: 60% segment margin less 20% overhead less capex that has fallen to 29% of revenue is a high-single-digit free-cash-flow margin in 2030, and the multiple prices the replacement-capex business beyond it rather than the terminal quarter. CoreWeave, the closest listed comparable in this repo, carries 3.0x - but it is a leased, debt-financed fleet with $29.5bn of net debt, where Cerebras is net cash $7.7bn and owns its silicon.

Read the other way round: at $186.67 the market is paying 3.9x terminal-year revenue, holding every other assumption on this page fixed. That is the number to argue about.

Quarter by quarter

The projected path

Quarter HardwareCloud and other services Revenue YoY EBITDA Capex FCF R40 PV of FCF
2026 Q3E $59M$199M $258M +90% $76M $305M -$229M +1 -$222M
2026 Q4E $63M$296M $359M +110% $114M $385M -$271M +34 -$254M
2027 Q1E $68M$418M $486M +151% $164M $464M -$300M +90 -$273M
2027 Q2E $74M$564M $638M +254% $226M $538M -$313M +205 -$275M
2027 Q3E $80M$733M $813M +215% $300M $607M -$307M +178 -$262M
2027 Q4E $86M$922M $1.01B +181% $386M $668M -$282M +153 -$233M
2028 Q1E $93M$1.13B $1.22B +152% $482M $722M -$240M +132 -$192M
2028 Q2E $101M$1.36B $1.46B +128% $589M $772M -$183M +116 -$142M
2028 Q3E $109M$1.60B $1.71B +110% $705M $818M -$113M +103 -$85M
2028 Q4E $118M$1.85B $1.97B +96% $829M $862M -$33M +94 -$24M
2029 Q1E $128M$2.13B $2.25B +84% $963M $906M $48M +86 $34M
2029 Q2E $138M$2.41B $2.55B +75% $1.11B $953M $130M +80 $89M
2029 Q3E $149M$2.72B $2.87B +68% $1.26B $1.00B $216M +75 $143M
2029 Q4E $161M$3.04B $3.20B +62% $1.42B $1.06B $307M +72 $197M
2030 Q1E $175M$3.38B $3.55B +58% $1.59B $1.12B $402M +69 $250M
2030 Q2E $189M$3.74B $3.93B +54% $1.77B $1.18B $500M +67 $302M
2030 Q3E $204M$4.13B $4.33B +51% $1.97B $1.26B $603M +65 $352M
2030 Q4E $221M$4.54B $4.76B +49% $2.17B $1.34B $710M +64 $402M

Every row is projected. A year-over-year change is shown only where the quarter it compares against exists — an em dash means there is no comparable quarter, not a flat year.

Track record

Model revisions

Assumptions are marked to reality as each quarter prints. Every change is appended here, with the fair value the model produced at the time, so the model's own history stays visible.

DateChangedFair value thenNote
2026-08-27 all $139.08 First build, on the 2026 Q2 basis. Calibrated to the raised FY2026 core guide and the 2027 tripling converted to GAAP through the disclosed warrant and pass-through bridge, with the decay shaped by the two buckets of the $25.4bn RPO schedule.