← AVGO forward model

AVGO · Forward model · Infrastructure Software · Bull case

What has to happen in Infrastructure Software

Model as of

This page changes Infrastructure Software inside the complete AVGO model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.

AVGO forward model
Horizon
Consolidated fair value $635.57 all other verticals held in this portfolio case
Final-quarter revenue $20.41B 23% of company revenue
Explicit segment contribution $176.66B EBITDA less segment capex, before corporate items

Management's own fiscal 2028 line of sight, taken seriously. It says the build rate does not decay monotonically - that the customer roadmap steps up rather than fading, with Anthropic going from 5 GW in 2027 to an incremental 10 GW in 2028 and OpenAI from 1.3 GW to over 5 GW, and that content per gigawatt holds at the top of the disclosed band. Note what it does NOT reach: even here fiscal 2028 AI revenue lands near $171B against the $230B management named, because a compounding growth tilt cannot rebuild the ramp underneath it - reaching $230B needs a second acceleration in the build rate, not a faster version of the current one. That gap is the finding, and it is the single most important thing to watch over the next two prints.

Infrastructure Software

Basis quarter$8.75B
Final quarter$20.41B
Implied CAGR+18%
Final revenue mix23%

VMware, essentially. A subscription estate being converted from perpetual licences to VMware Cloud Foundation at much higher prices, bolted onto the mainframe and security assets from CA and Symantec. Boring, and the reason Broadcom's cash flow does not swing with the silicon cycle.

Last four quarters
2025 Q4 $6.94B Reported
2026 Q1 $6.80B Reported
2026 Q2 $7.18B Reported
2026 Q3 $8.75B Reported
VMware Cloud Foundation subscriptionsMainframe software (CA)Enterprise security (Symantec, Carbon Black)Legacy perpetual licence and maintenance runoff
Sequential growth −0.6%/qtr decaying toward +2.0% -0.6% into Q4. Management guides infrastructure software to STABILISE at about $8.7B against $8,752M reported.
Infrastructure Software

Latest: $20.41B (2031Q3E)

Period Value
2025Q2 $6.60B
2025Q3 $6.79B
2025Q4 $6.94B
2026Q1 $6.80B
2026Q2 $7.18B
2026Q3 $8.75B
2026Q4E $8.87B
2027Q1E $9.08B
2027Q2E $9.35B
2027Q3E $9.68B
2027Q4E $10.06B
2028Q1E $10.48B
2028Q2E $10.94B
2028Q3E $11.44B
2028Q4E $11.98B
2029Q1E $12.55B
2029Q2E $13.16B
2029Q3E $13.81B
2029Q4E $14.49B
2030Q1E $15.21B
2030Q2E $15.97B
2030Q3E $16.77B
2030Q4E $17.61B
2031Q1E $18.50B
2031Q2E $19.43B
2031Q3E $20.41B

Assumptions & reasoning

  • Every actual here is a reported segment figure, taken straight off the face of the earnings release. Nothing in this vertical's revenue history is estimated or apportioned — what is assumed is the cost side, since Broadcom does not publish segment EBITDA or segment capex.
  • The model does NOT chase the guided quarter, and this is the one place it deliberately falls short. Total 2026 Q3 revenue is guided to roughly $29.4B and AI to $16.0B; with non-AI semiconductors near $4.5B the residual leaves about $8.9B for software, a 24% sequential jump for a business that grew 1% year over year two quarters ago. This line projects 16% instead, landing near $8.3B, and consolidated revenue therefore comes in about 2% under the guide. Treating part of that step as renewal timing rather than run-rate is a judgement call, and it is stated rather than tuned away.
  • The whole growth story is renewal repricing, not new customers. Perpetual VMware licences convert to VCF subscriptions at a large multiple of the old price as each contract comes up, so growth is a function of how much of the estate is still unconverted. That pool is finite, which is why the rate decays to 2% a quarter — roughly 8% a year — rather than holding.
  • 82% EBITDA margin, gliding to 80%, is the highest on this page and it is what makes the mix argument work: as AI margin drifts down, software is the ballast. Broadcom does not disclose segment profitability, so this number is calibrated so the three verticals less 4% central overhead reproduce the consolidated 68.7% Adjusted EBITDA margin actually reported in the basis quarter.
  • The risk here is churn, and it is not visible in a quarterly revenue line until it is large. Repricing an estate at a multiple of the old cost is a strong incentive for enterprises to migrate to a hyperscaler or to a competing hypervisor; departures show up years later as a renewal that does not happen. The Bear case is where that lives.
AVGO model map

Explore another vertical