← ZS forward model

ZS · Forward model · Zero Trust Exchange subscriptions · Chaudhry case

What has to happen in Zero Trust Exchange subscriptions

Model as of

This page changes Zero Trust Exchange subscriptions inside the complete ZS model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.

ZS forward model
Horizon
Consolidated fair value $384.04 all other verticals held in this portfolio case
Final-quarter revenue $2.39B 100% of company revenue
Explicit segment contribution $7.61B EBITDA less segment capex, before corporate items

The founder's case, in the words he filed. Jay Chaudhry has argued for eighteen years that the perimeter is the wrong architecture; his claim now is that agentic AI makes the argument urgent rather than merely correct, because every AI agent is a connection that has to be brokered and Zscaler already sits in the path of every connection. The quarter carries the artefacts - an intent to acquire Symmetry Systems for access-graph technology to govern AI agent communication at scale, membership of Anthropic's Project Glasswing, an OpenAI partnership through DayBreak, IL5 authorisation from the Department of War. What it does NOT reach is a number: there is no disclosed agent count, no AI-security revenue line and no AI pricing anywhere in the filings. So this case re-rates the net-new-ARR build and the exit multiple. It is not a new vertical and must not be built as one.

Zero Trust Exchange subscriptions

Basis quarter$850M
Final quarter$2.39B
Implied CAGR+23%
Final revenue mix100%

Zscaler brokers every user-to-application connection in its own cloud and sells the service as a multi-year subscription recognised ratably, so revenue in any quarter is the run-off of a contracted base rather than the result of a sale. The base is published: annual recurring revenue, which Zscaler defines as the next twelve months of subscription revenue at the measurement date, was $3,525 million at 30 April 2026, extended by $166 million of net new ARR in the quarter. Revenue has been 95.4% to 98.4% of one quarter of that base in each of the four quarters ARR has been disclosed. The model is that mechanism: an ARR base, a quarterly build, and a conversion rate.

Last four quarters
2025 Q4 $719M Reported
2026 Q1 $788M Reported
2026 Q2 $816M Reported
2026 Q3 $850M Reported
Subscription and support, approximately 98% of revenue per the Form 10-Q; the remainder is professional services and other, which Zscaler does not break out
ARR base 3525 $M of ARR at the basis quarter ARR of $3,525M at 30 April 2026, disclosed in the release: 'Grew 25% year-over-year to $3,525 million'.
Net new ARR 182 $M of ARR/qtr changing +1.2% per quarter Fiscal-2026 average net new ARR, (3,744.5 - 3,015) / 4. Below the guided July peak: the engine adds this every quarter.
Utilisation 95% share of a quarter of ending ARR that lands as revenue, gliding toward 95% Solved so one glide step reproduces the guided quarter: 876.5 / (3,707.4 x 0.25) = 94.56% after the step.
Revenue per $M of ARR $250000/qtr drifting 0.0% per quarter Not a judgement: ARR is defined as the next 12 months of subscription revenue, so a quarter earns a quarter of it.
Zero Trust Exchange subscriptions

Latest: $2.39B (2031Q3E)

Period Value
2023Q2 $388M
2023Q3 $419M
2023Q4 $455M
2024Q1 $497M
2024Q2 $525M
2024Q3 $553M
2024Q4 $593M
2025Q1 $628M
2025Q2 $648M
2025Q3 $678M
2025Q4 $719M
2026Q1 $788M
2026Q2 $816M
2026Q3 $850M
2026Q4E $889M
2027Q1E $946M
2027Q2E $1.01B
2027Q3E $1.07B
2027Q4E $1.13B
2028Q1E $1.20B
2028Q2E $1.27B
2028Q3E $1.34B
2028Q4E $1.41B
2029Q1E $1.49B
2029Q2E $1.56B
2029Q3E $1.64B
2029Q4E $1.73B
2030Q1E $1.81B
2030Q2E $1.90B
2030Q3E $1.99B
2030Q4E $2.09B
2031Q1E $2.19B
2031Q2E $2.29B
2031Q3E $2.39B

Assumptions & reasoning

  • One vertical carrying the one reported revenue line. Zscaler operates as a single reportable segment and prints a single Revenue caption; all fourteen quarters here are disclosed GAAP revenue read from the Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1 of each quarter, and nothing is apportioned or estimated.
  • The ARR base trace reads about $3,707M at the first projected quarter against management's guide of $3.740-3.749bn. That 1.0% shortfall is deliberate: the engine applies one net-new-ARR figure to every quarter, and seeding it with the guided July peak of $219.5M would repeat a seasonal bookings spike twenty times and inflate the terminal base by about a tenth. The revenue the model values lands inside the revenue guide instead.
  • ARR has only four disclosed quarters. Zscaler began publishing it with the fiscal 2025 fourth quarter and reported calculated billings before that; the two are different measures and were not spliced. This is the thinnest evidence in the model and the reason the conversion rate glides back to a level actually observed rather than to a round number.
  • Red Canary, acquired on 1 August 2025 for $651.4 million of cash, contributed $127 million of the $3,525 million base. Excluding it, ARR grew 21% rather than 25% and net new ARR grew 14%. Its revenue contribution is never disclosed, so it cannot be carried as a separate line.
  • Regional divergence is disclosed every quarter and deliberately not modelled: United States revenue grew 32% year over year in the basis quarter to $452.6 million, 53% of the total against 51% a year earlier, while EMEA grew 16% to $236.4 million. There is no regional ARR, customer count or guidance, so four geographic verticals would be four bare growth rates in place of one evidenced mechanism.
  • No seasonality factors. A centred four-quarter moving-average test over the fourteen-quarter series gives a signal of 2.7 points against a worst within-slot spread of 1.9 points, and the largest factor is an artefact of the Red Canary close rather than a shape. Zscaler's real seasonality is in bookings and shows up in net new ARR - $155.5M, then $166.0M, then a guided $219.5M in the July quarter - not in ratably recognised revenue.
ZS model map

Explore another vertical