SCHW · Forward model · Bank deposit account fees · Bear case
What has to happen in Bank deposit account fees
Model as of
This page changes Bank deposit account fees inside the complete SCHW model. Every other vertical,
corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.
Shares this vertical and portfolio case. Slider and horizon edits stay in your browser.
SCHW forward model
Horizon
Consolidated fair value$65.41all other verticals held in this portfolio case
Final-quarter revenue$106M1% of company revenue
Explicit segment contribution$1.49BEBITDA less segment capex, before corporate items
The June quarter was the peak: its record 11.9 million daily average trades ran 44% above the 8.3 million of 2025 Q4. Trading reverts toward that 2025 Q4 level rather than holding even the guided 10.6 million; the net interest margin stops at the guided 3.25%-3.30% exit and then gives it back as the forward curve's cuts arrive and deposit betas stop being zero (Schwab's own sensitivity table puts each 25bp move in the Fed funds target at roughly $250M-$300M of annualized net interest revenue, at a zero deposit beta); and the market re-rates Schwab toward a money-centre-bank multiple. Implemented as a -1.0% sequential growth tilt, a -3.0 point margin delta, a 13x P/E exit (9.921x on pre-tax) and a 10.5% cost of equity. WHAT THIS CASE DOES NOT ASSUME is a capital event: the $20.0B buyback authorisation is not withdrawn and the 8.7% consolidated Tier 1 Leverage Ratio is not in question. Result: $65.41 a share, -39.46%, an implied 4.640x tangible book - almost exactly the 4.952x that a 30% through-cycle ROTCE justifies at a 9.25% cost of equity, so the bear is not an outlier. It is what Schwab is worth if the 44% ROTCE is a cycle rather than a level.
Bank deposit account fees
Basis quarter$333M
Final quarter$106M
Implied CAGR−21%
Final revenue mix1%
Fees on the legacy TD Ameritrade insured-deposit arrangement: $70.6B of balances at quarter end against $82.1B a year earlier, 85% of them designated fixed-rate and 15% floating. 4.7% of the basis quarter and the only line whose volume and price move in opposite directions - balances fell 14% year on year while the fee rate rose 35%, because the average net yield on the fixed-rate tranche re-priced upward as older tranches rolled off. It is a melting ice cube with a warming surface, and the balance leg is the one this model trusts: the run-off is contractual, the yield lift is not.
Last four quarters
2025 Q3$247MReported
2025 Q4$238MReported
2026 Q1$295MReported
2026 Q2$333MReported
Fixed-rate bank deposit account obligation (85% of balances)Floating-rate bank deposit account obligation (15% of balances)
Capacity energised72050000000 $M of average bank deposit account balancesat the basis quarter($73.5B at 2026 Q1 + $70.6B at 2026 Q2) / 2. Schwab prints period-end BDA balances, never averages.
Capacity added-2900000000 $M of average bank deposit account balances/qtrchanging −3.0% per quarter-$2.9B a quarter. The four observed sequential declines average -$2.875B; the run-off is contractual.
Utilisation100%gliding toward 100%100%: the whole insured-deposit balance earns the arrangement's net yield. No idle balance concept.
Revenue per $M of average bank deposit account balances$0/qtrdrifting 0.0% per quarter$333M / $72,050M = 0.4622% a quarter, 1.85% annualised, against 1.19% annualised a year earlier.
Bank deposit account fees
Latest: $106M (2031Q2E)
Period
Value
2021Q4
$304M
2022Q1
$294M
2022Q2
$352M
2022Q3
$413M
2022Q4
$350M
2023Q1
$151M
2023Q2
$175M
2023Q3
$205M
2023Q4
$174M
2024Q1
$183M
2024Q2
$153M
2024Q3
$152M
2024Q4
$241M
2025Q1
$245M
2025Q2
$247M
2025Q3
$247M
2025Q4
$238M
2026Q1
$295M
2026Q2
$333M
2026Q3E
$316M
2026Q4E
$300M
2027Q1E
$285M
2027Q2E
$271M
2027Q3E
$257M
2027Q4E
$243M
2028Q1E
$230M
2028Q2E
$218M
2028Q3E
$206M
2028Q4E
$195M
2029Q1E
$184M
2029Q2E
$174M
2029Q3E
$164M
2029Q4E
$155M
2030Q1E
$145M
2030Q2E
$137M
2030Q3E
$128M
2030Q4E
$121M
2031Q1E
$113M
2031Q2E
$106M
Assumptions & reasoning
A CAPACITY driver on a DECLINING base, and the first negative capacity addition in this repository. Both legs are disclosed - quarter-end balances every quarter and the fee itself - and the run-off is the disclosed fact the driver carries rather than a growth assumption in reverse.
ASEASONAL: centred-moving-average factors of [0.9223, 0.9608, 1.0547, 1.0621], a signal of 0.1398 against a worst window-to-window spread of 0.4500 - a 0.31:1 ratio, the weakest in the set. The 2023 Q1 window ratio of 0.613 is the contractual repricing of the arrangement, not a first-quarter effect.
This line falls from $333M to about $129M a quarter by 2031 Q2 in the base case - 1.4% of terminal revenue. Getting it wrong cannot move the valuation, and pretending it is stable would be the larger error.