PATH · Forward model · Platform (licences and subscription services) · Bull case
What has to happen in Platform (licences and subscription services)
Model as of
This page changes Platform (licences and subscription services) inside the complete PATH model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.
Shares this vertical and portfolio case. Slider and horizon edits stay in your browser.
Platform (licences and subscription services)
96.1% of revenue and effectively all of the value. UiPath sells multi-year subscription contracts and splits the revenue two ways under ASC 606: the term-licence element is recognised UP FRONT at delivery, the maintenance, support and cloud element ratably. One disclosed number measures the recurring value of both and of nothing else. UiPath defines annualised renewal run-rate as "annualized invoiced amounts per solution SKU from subscription licenses and maintenance and support obligations" and states that it "does not include invoiced amounts associated with perpetual licenses or professional services", so ARR is exactly the earning base for these two lines. It was $1,901.2m at 30 April 2026, up 12%, and the company guides it to $2,058-2,063m by 31 January 2027. Recognised revenue has converted 84.7% to 90.6% of exit ARR, annualised and deseasonalised, in each of the last eight quarters. That is the mechanism the model projects: an ARR base that grows by a disclosed number of net new dollars, converting at a measured rate.
Latest: $689M (2032Q1E)
| Period | Value |
|---|---|
| 2024Q1 | $280M |
| 2024Q2 | $279M |
| 2024Q3 | $316M |
| 2024Q4 | $396M |
| 2025Q1 | $325M |
| 2025Q2 | $307M |
| 2025Q3 | $344M |
| 2025Q4 | $413M |
| 2026Q1 | $346M |
| 2026Q2 | $351M |
| 2026Q3 | $398M |
| 2026Q4 | $467M |
| 2027Q1 | $402M |
| 2027Q2E | $385M |
| 2027Q3E | $435M |
| 2027Q4E | $533M |
| 2028Q1E | $444M |
| 2028Q2E | $436M |
| 2028Q3E | $492M |
| 2028Q4E | $603M |
| 2029Q1E | $501M |
| 2029Q2E | $491M |
| 2029Q3E | $553M |
| 2029Q4E | $675M |
| 2030Q1E | $560M |
| 2030Q2E | $549M |
| 2030Q3E | $616M |
| 2030Q4E | $752M |
| 2031Q1E | $623M |
| 2031Q2E | $609M |
| 2031Q3E | $684M |
| 2031Q4E | $833M |
| 2032Q1E | $689M |
Assumptions & reasoning
- This vertical is the SUM of two lines printed side by side in UiPath's filed condensed consolidated statements of operations: Licenses and Subscription services. Nothing is apportioned and nothing is estimated. In the basis quarter that is $149,309 thousand plus $252,903 thousand = $402,212 thousand, and the same addition reconciles all thirteen quarters to reported total revenue to the dollar once the services line is added.
- The two lines are NOT modelled separately, and the reason is not that the split is undisclosed - it is disclosed - but that they are the two recognition halves of the SAME contracts. A single ARR figure covers both with no published apportionment, so giving each an independent growth rate would forecast one contract twice and discard the only metric UiPath guides.
- Seasonality is a recognition calendar, not a demand cycle. UiPath's fiscal year ends 31 January, term licences are recognised up front, and contracts closed against the year-end quota land in that quarter. Measured by ratio to a centred four-quarter moving average, the Licenses line alone runs 0.898 / 0.752 / 0.956 / 1.394 across the April, July, October and January quarters - a 64-point swing - while the ratably recognised Subscription services line runs 0.982 / 1.007 / 1.010 / 1.001, a 2.8-point swing that is inside its own measurement spread. The combined factors used here are 0.9445 / 0.9001 / 0.9850 / 1.1704: a 27.1-point signal against a worst window-to-window spread of 3.7 points. Raw licence revenue confirms it three years running with no exception - January quarters of $220.0m, $197.6m and $215.9m against July quarters of $119.3m, $112.3m and $112.2m.
- The gap between reported revenue growth of 17% and ARR growth of 12% in the basis quarter is that recognition timing, not incremental recurring value. Licences grew 16.4% year over year while the recurring base grew 12.3%. A model built on the revenue line alone would extrapolate the timing; this one extrapolates the base.
- Risk the model does not carry: if the licence share of this vertical falls - which a shift toward cloud and ratable recognition would cause - reported revenue growth drops below ARR growth for several quarters with the business unchanged, and these seasonal factors over-forecast every January quarter. The licence share has run 34% to 46% over the disclosed history and was 37.1% in the basis quarter.