← Okta, Inc.

OKTA · Forward model · McKinnon case

The McKinnon case, 20 quarters out

Model as of

Each segment is projected from its own operating driver, rolled up into consolidated cash flow, and discounted back to a fair value per share. The assumptions below are editable — change them and every number on this page moves with them.

Reported lines only. Okta operates as ONE reportable segment and disaggregates revenue into exactly two lines in its statements of operations - Subscription and Professional services and other - and this model carries exactly those two. All fourteen historical quarters, 2023 Q2 through 2026 Q3, are disclosed figures read from the 8-K Exhibit 99.1 of each quarter; nothing is apportioned and nothing is estimated. Every quarter's two lines sum to reported total revenue exactly, $793m + $12m = $805m at the basis quarter. There is no Workforce-versus-Customer-Identity split and no quarterly geographic split to be had; either would be manufactured. QUARTER LABELS ARE FISCAL. The r40 label is the calendar quarter each fiscal period ENDS in, so '2026 Q3' here is the three months ended 31 July 2026, Okta's fiscal 2027 second quarter. Seasonality index 0 is therefore the quarter ending 31 JANUARY, not January-March. FREE CASH FLOW IS NOT OKTA'S FREE CASH FLOW. The engine computes it as EBITDA less capex less tax. Okta's reported figure is operating cash flow less property, equipment and capitalised software, so it also includes interest income - about $19m in the basis quarter - and the working-capital inflow from deferred revenue and deferred commissions. The $2,299m generating that interest is added back separately as net cash, so counting it inside free cash flow as well would double-count it. The model's first projected year runs a 25.9% free-cash-flow margin against Okta's guided 28-29% for fiscal 2027 and a 31.3% trailing-twelve-month reported margin, and the model's Rule of 40 therefore runs below the site's own R40 card for the same quarter. Okta's reported free cash flow is also heavily seasonal on collections, 12% to 42% of revenue across the stored quarters, while the engine produces a smooth margin: compare annual totals, never one projected quarter. Margins are on Okta's NON-GAAP basis - 84.0% subscription and -50.0% services gross margin in the basis quarter - while our stored series holds the GAAP figure, about two points lower. Corporate overhead is zero because the vertical margins are already struck at a consolidated level; adding an overhead line would double-count operating expense. Tax is a constant 15%, between the disclosed 7.7% effective rate under a full US valuation allowance and the 21% non-GAAP planning rate management adopted on 1 February 2026; fair value moves about 1.2% per point. Shares are 178,808,000 GAAP diluted, matching the filed statements and our stored company profile; management's own guidance assumes the 184,448,000 non-GAAP count, which would lower fair value by about 3.2%. The $555m remaining on the $1bn buyback pushes the other way and is NOT modelled - a buyback is a financing use of cash, not an operating outlay, and charging it as capex would understate free cash flow. There is no capital programme: Okta has no fab, plant or joint venture, and the $13m of half-year capital spending is already inside the vertical capex intensities. The reference price is the $172.91 close of 27 August 2026, the session after the print, not the $134.42 that our stored profile still carries. No consensus figure is used anywhere: the available feed mixes three different EPS bases for the same quarter, so every beat quoted here is measured against Okta's own prior guidance instead.

OKTA forward model
Horizon
Fair value per share $157.00 −8% against $171.11
Terminal-year revenue $4.91B last four projected quarters
Enterprise value $25.77B $4.44B explicit + $21.34B terminal

Todd McKinnon's case, in his own filed words: every AI agent is an identity that has to be discovered, governed and revoked, and Okta is the neutral place that happens. If agent identities become a per-agent line item rather than a feature of the existing seat, revenue per large customer reprices upward without a single new logo - so this is a re-rating of the ARPU half of the driver, applied as a 0.6-point-a-quarter tilt on the subscription vertical alone, plus a 7.0x exit. Fair value $157.00, still 9.2% below the close, on terminal revenue of $4,910m. What it does NOT do is build an agent vertical: there is no disclosed agent count, no agent revenue and no agent pricing anywhere in the filings, so a separate line would be manufactured.

OKTA REVENUE MODEL

Latest: $1.27B (2031Q3E)

Period Value
2023Q2 $518M
2023Q3 $556M
2023Q4 $584M
2024Q1 $605M
2024Q2 $617M
2024Q3 $646M
2024Q4 $665M
2025Q1 $682M
2025Q2 $688M
2025Q3 $728M
2025Q4 $742M
2026Q1 $761M
2026Q2 $765M
2026Q3 $805M
2026Q4E $825M
2027Q1E $848M
2027Q2E $853M
2027Q3E $894M
2027Q4E $914M
2028Q1E $937M
2028Q2E $941M
2028Q3E $984M
2028Q4E $1.00B
2029Q1E $1.03B
2029Q2E $1.03B
2029Q3E $1.08B
2029Q4E $1.10B
2030Q1E $1.12B
2030Q2E $1.12B
2030Q3E $1.17B
2030Q4E $1.19B
2031Q1E $1.22B
2031Q2E $1.22B
2031Q3E $1.27B
Scenarios

Where each case comes from

Bear case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bear column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Bull case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bull column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

McKinnon case — primary sources

The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the McKinnon column is what happens if they are taken at face value.

Valuation

From cash flow to fair value

The published model, discounted at 10.0% a year with an exit multiple of 7.0x on revenue. The sliders above do not change this walk.

Present value of free cash flow, 20 quarters$4.44B
Terminal-year revenue$4.91B
Terminal-year EBITDA$1.73B
Exit multiple, on revenue7.0x
Terminal value$34.37B
Discounted at 10.0% a year, terminal value becomes$21.34B
Share of enterprise value from the terminal83%
Enterprise value$25.77B
Net cash$2.30B
Equity value$28.07B
Shares0.18B
Fair value per share$157.00
Against the deployed price of $171.11, as of −8%

Terminal value is 79.7% of enterprise value in the base case, so the exit multiple is the single largest input in this model and any statement about Okta being cheap or expensive is a statement about that multiple. The base takes 6.0x terminal revenue: the terminal year grows 6.1% at a 29.1% free-cash-flow margin, which is about 20.7x terminal cash flow. Okta itself trades at 8.88x guided fiscal 2027 revenue - $30,916m of equity at $172.91 on 178.8m diluted shares, less $2,299m of net cash, over the $3,221m guidance midpoint. Repo peers at the same exit line: Salesforce 4.5x on roughly 10% growth, ServiceNow 7.5x, Datadog 8.0x, Palo Alto 9.0x, CrowdStrike 12.0x at a 35% free-cash-flow margin. A 6% grower does not belong at the top of that range. The discount rate is 10%, peer-consistent for a profitable software business with $2.3bn of net cash and no financing need.

Read the other way round: at $171.11 the market is paying 7.8x terminal-year revenue, holding every other assumption on this page fixed. That is the number to argue about.

Quarter by quarter

The projected path

Quarter SubscriptionProfessional services and other Revenue YoY EBITDA Capex FCF R40 PV of FCF
2026 Q4E $814M$11M $825M +11% $254M $7M $209M +37 $204M
2027 Q1E $838M$10M $848M +11% $264M $8M $218M +37 $208M
2027 Q2E $844M$10M $853M +12% $269M $8M $222M +38 $207M
2027 Q3E $885M$9M $894M +11% $285M $8M $236M +37 $214M
2027 Q4E $906M$8M $914M +11% $295M $9M $244M +37 $216M
2028 Q1E $929M$8M $937M +11% $305M $9M $252M +37 $218M
2028 Q2E $933M$8M $941M +10% $309M $9M $255M +37 $216M
2028 Q3E $976M$7M $984M +10% $326M $9M $269M +37 $223M
2028 Q4E $998M$7M $1.00B +10% $336M $10M $277M +37 $224M
2029 Q1E $1.02B$7M $1.03B +10% $346M $10M $286M +38 $225M
2029 Q2E $1.02B$7M $1.03B +10% $349M $10M $288M +38 $222M
2029 Q3E $1.07B$6M $1.08B +9% $367M $10M $303M +38 $228M
2029 Q4E $1.09B$6M $1.10B +9% $376M $11M $311M +38 $228M
2030 Q1E $1.12B$6M $1.12B +9% $387M $11M $319M +38 $229M
2030 Q2E $1.12B$6M $1.12B +9% $389M $11M $322M +38 $225M
2030 Q3E $1.17B$6M $1.17B +9% $408M $11M $337M +38 $230M
2030 Q4E $1.19B$6M $1.19B +9% $418M $12M $345M +38 $230M
2031 Q1E $1.21B$5M $1.22B +9% $429M $12M $354M +38 $231M
2031 Q2E $1.22B$5M $1.22B +9% $431M $12M $356M +38 $226M
2031 Q3E $1.27B$5M $1.27B +9% $451M $13M $373M +38 $231M

Every row is projected. A year-over-year change is shown only where the quarter it compares against exists — an em dash means there is no comparable quarter, not a flat year.

Track record

Model revisions

Assumptions are marked to reality as each quarter prints. Every change is appended here, with the fair value the model produced at the time, so the model's own history stays visible.

DateFair value thenNote
2026-08-29 $127.74 First published model, built on the 2026 Q3 (fiscal 2027 second quarter) 8-K Exhibit 99.1 and the matching 10-Q: fourteen disclosed quarters of the subscription and professional-services split, the disclosed $100k+ ACV customer count as the subscription driver, and day-count seasonality on the subscription line only.