GTLB · Forward model · Act 2 case
The Act 2 case, 20 quarters out
Model as of
Each segment is projected from its own operating driver, rolled up into consolidated cash flow, and discounted back to a fair value per share. The assumptions below are editable — change them and every number on this page moves with them.
GitLab operates one reportable segment, so there is no segment profitability anywhere in its filings. What it does report, on the face of every income statement since the IPO, is two revenue lines with their own cost of revenue: Subscription - self-managed and SaaS, and License - self-managed and other. Those two lines are this model's verticals, and all twenty-two historical points across eleven quarters are filed figures that sum to reported total revenue to the dollar in every quarter; none is estimated and none is apportioned. Below that line nothing is disclosed: no SaaS-versus-self-managed split, no revenue or ARR for GitLab Duo or the Duo Agent Platform, no geographic revenue, no line-level operating margin, and no total addressable market of any kind. The subscription driver uses Base Customers, GitLab's own defined count of customers paying more than $5,000 of annual recurring revenue, disclosed each quarter for the last seven; the addressable pool of 45,000 is assumed and never binds. The EBITDA margins are calibrated cash margins solved back from reported adjusted free-cash-flow conversion, not reported operating margins, because the engine has no concept of stock-based compensation. The split of GitLab's guided quarter across the two lines applies one implied year-over-year rate to both, which is a modelling choice the company has never made. The $400 million buyback authorised in March 2026 is a financing use of cash with no place in this engine; it appears only in the share count.
Shares this page's scenario. Driver and horizon edits stay in your browser — the recipient sees the published model.
Latest: $406M (2032Q1E)
| Period | Value |
|---|---|
| 2024Q3 | $150M |
| 2024Q4 | $164M |
| 2025Q1 | $169M |
| 2025Q2 | $183M |
| 2025Q3 | $196M |
| 2025Q4 | $211M |
| 2026Q1 | $215M |
| 2026Q2 | $236M |
| 2026Q3 | $244M |
| 2026Q4 | $260M |
| 2027Q1 | $264M |
| 2027Q2E | $273M |
| 2027Q3E | $278M |
| 2027Q4E | $290M |
| 2028Q1E | $290M |
| 2028Q2E | $298M |
| 2028Q3E | $304M |
| 2028Q4E | $317M |
| 2029Q1E | $316M |
| 2029Q2E | $325M |
| 2029Q3E | $331M |
| 2029Q4E | $344M |
| 2030Q1E | $345M |
| 2030Q2E | $354M |
| 2030Q3E | $360M |
| 2030Q4E | $374M |
| 2031Q1E | $374M |
| 2031Q2E | $384M |
| 2031Q3E | $391M |
| 2031Q4E | $405M |
| 2032Q1E | $406M |
Where each case comes from
Bear case — primary sources
The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bear column is what happens if they are taken at face value.
Seven quarters of decelerating volume metrics
- Jun 2, 2026 Customers with more than $5,000 of ARR reached 10,831, an increase of 7% year-over-year.
- Jun 2, 2026 Dollar-Based Net Retention Rate was 117%.
- Dec 5, 2024 Customers with more than $5,000 of ARR reached 9,519, an increase of 16% year-over-year.
- Dec 5, 2024 Dollar-Based Net Retention Rate was 124%.
Bull case — primary sources
The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Bull column is what happens if they are taken at face value.
Contracted work running ahead of the guide
- Jun 2, 2026 Total RPO grew 18% year-over-year to $1.1 billion, while cRPO grew 24% to $724.1 million.
- Jun 2, 2026 Customers with more than $100,000 of ARR reached 1,519, an increase of 18% year-over-year.
- Mar 3, 2026 Customers with more than $1 million of ARR reached 155, an increase of 26% year-over-year.
Act 2 case — primary sources
The primary sources this case is built from — filings, calls and posts. Where they are claims by an interested party rather than disclosures, every number in the Act 2 column is what happens if they are taken at face value.
The restructuring GitLab announced with the basis quarter
- Jun 2, 2026 GitLab also announced it is reducing its full-time workforce by approximately 14%, or 350 team members to realign its operating structure to optimize execution against its strategic priorities.
- Jun 2, 2026 GitLab also expects to exit 22 countries to reduce its team member geographic footprint by approximately 37%.
- Jun 2, 2026 It estimates that it will incur approximately $30 million to $35 million in pre-tax restructuring charges, consisting primarily of one-time severance, employee termination benefit costs, and retention costs associated with the execution of the Plan, of which approximately $19 million is expected to be incurred in the second quarter of fiscal year 2027
From cash flow to fair value
The published model, discounted at 10.0% a year with an exit multiple of 5.0x on revenue. The horizon and sliders above do not change this walk.
| Present value of free cash flow, 20 quarters | $1.58B |
| Terminal-year revenue | $1.59B |
| Terminal-year EBITDA | $671M |
| Exit multiple, on revenue | 5.0x |
| Terminal value | $7.93B |
| Discounted at 10.0% a year, terminal value becomes | $4.93B |
| Share of enterprise value from the terminal | 76% |
| Enterprise value | $6.50B |
| Net cash | $1.36B |
| Equity value | $7.86B |
| Shares | 0.17B |
| Fair value per share | $46.56 |
| Against the deployed price of $47.25, as of | −1% |
10% on a business with $1.36 billion of cash and short-term investments, no borrowings of any kind and no financing need. The exit multiple is by far the largest lever here, and it has to be, because 77% of enterprise value sits in the terminal: GitLab trades at 6.5 times trailing revenue today and the base case exits the horizon at 4.5 times, a deliberate 30% derating for a line growing about 9% a year by then and converting roughly 28% of revenue to cash. Holding everything else, 3.5x gives $38.29 a share, 4.0x $41.43, 4.5x $44.57 and 5.0x $47.71 - a full turn of the multiple is worth about $6.30, more than a third of the gap between the bear and the base case. A point on the discount rate is worth about $1.50: 9% gives $46.10 and 11% gives $43.12. The 22% tax rate is GitLab's own stated projected non-GAAP rate for fiscal 2026 and 2027, not an assumption of ours.
Read the other way round: at $47.25 the market is paying 5.1x terminal-year revenue, holding every other assumption on this page fixed. That is the number to argue about.
The projected path
The published model's 20 quarters. The horizon and sliders above do not change this table.
| Quarter | Subscription - self-managed and SaaS | License - self-managed and other | Revenue | YoY | EBITDA | Capex | FCF | R40 | PV of FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 Q2E | $246M | $27M | $273M | +16% | $97M | $3M | $74M | +43 | $72M |
| 2027 Q3E | $253M | $25M | $278M | +14% | $101M | $3M | $77M | +41 | $73M |
| 2027 Q4E | $259M | $31M | $290M | +12% | $106M | $3M | $81M | +39 | $75M |
| 2028 Q1E | $266M | $24M | $290M | +10% | $109M | $3M | $83M | +38 | $75M |
| 2028 Q2E | $273M | $26M | $298M | +9% | $113M | $3M | $86M | +38 | $76M |
| 2028 Q3E | $280M | $24M | $304M | +9% | $117M | $3M | $89M | +39 | $77M |
| 2028 Q4E | $286M | $30M | $317M | +9% | $122M | $3M | $93M | +38 | $79M |
| 2029 Q1E | $293M | $23M | $316M | +9% | $124M | $3M | $95M | +39 | $78M |
| 2029 Q2E | $300M | $25M | $325M | +9% | $129M | $3M | $98M | +39 | $79M |
| 2029 Q3E | $307M | $24M | $331M | +9% | $133M | $3M | $101M | +39 | $79M |
| 2029 Q4E | $315M | $30M | $344M | +9% | $138M | $3M | $105M | +39 | $81M |
| 2030 Q1E | $322M | $23M | $345M | +9% | $140M | $3M | $107M | +40 | $80M |
| 2030 Q2E | $329M | $25M | $354M | +9% | $145M | $4M | $110M | +40 | $81M |
| 2030 Q3E | $336M | $24M | $360M | +9% | $149M | $4M | $113M | +40 | $81M |
| 2030 Q4E | $344M | $30M | $374M | +9% | $154M | $4M | $118M | +40 | $82M |
| 2031 Q1E | $352M | $23M | $374M | +9% | $157M | $4M | $119M | +41 | $81M |
| 2031 Q2E | $359M | $25M | $384M | +9% | $161M | $4M | $123M | +41 | $82M |
| 2031 Q3E | $367M | $24M | $391M | +9% | $165M | $4M | $126M | +41 | $82M |
| 2031 Q4E | $375M | $30M | $405M | +8% | $171M | $4M | $130M | +41 | $83M |
| 2032 Q1E | $383M | $23M | $406M | +8% | $173M | $4M | $132M | +41 | $82M |
Every row is projected. A year-over-year change is shown only where the quarter it compares against exists — an em dash means there is no comparable quarter, not a flat year.
Model revisions
Assumptions are marked to reality as each quarter prints. Every change is appended here, with the fair value the model produced at the time, so the model's own history stays visible.
| Date | Fair value then | Note |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-31 | $44.57 | First model. Built on the fiscal 2027 Q1 basis quarter, one day before GitLab reports fiscal 2027 Q2 on 1 September 2026, so the guided quarter this model reproduces becomes a testable actual almost immediately. The calibration lands Q2 fiscal 2027 at $273.9 million inside the guided $272-274 million, and fiscal 2027 at $1,112.0 million at the bottom of the guided $1,112-1,118 million; the two cannot both be hit at their midpoints by one smooth driver, because the full-year guide implies second-half sequential acceleration that the quarterly guide alone does not. |