← AFRM forward model

AFRM · Forward model · Card network revenue · Bear case

What has to happen in Card network revenue

Model as of

This page changes Card network revenue inside the complete AFRM model. Every other vertical, corporate programme and valuation assumption stays in the selected portfolio case.

AFRM forward model
Horizon
Consolidated fair value $42.29 all other verticals held in this portfolio case
Final-quarter revenue $183M 9% of company revenue
Explicit segment contribution $650M EBITDA less segment capex, before corporate items

The credit cycle finally arrives. Delinquencies keep rising past what tax-refund seasonality explains, the provision eats the interest line, and the forward-flow market reprices the way it did in 2022 - so the gain-on-sale line does not get less profitable, it gets smaller. Funding costs stop falling. Merchant fee rates compress as volume migrates to the Card and to wallets where no merchant integration pays a network fee, and regulatory pressure on BNPL disclosure lands in the middle of it. Growth halves rather than stops, but a lender priced for growth and revalued as a lender is where most of the damage is.

Card network revenue

Basis quarter$85M
Final quarter$183M
Implied CAGR+17%
Final revenue mix9%

Interchange and virtual-card economics on the direct-to-consumer surface: the Affirm Card in the wallet and at the terminal, plus the virtual cards that carry wallet-partner volume. This is the engine Affirm's own framework leans on hardest - more than ten percentage points of annual growth from D2C - and it is the one line where the driver is a person rather than a purchase.

Last four quarters
2026 Q1 $69M Reported
2026 Q2 $73M Reported
2026 Q3 $66M Reported
2026 Q4 $85M Reported
Affirm Card interchangeVirtual card network economicsWallet partner volume (Apple Pay, Google Pay)
Subscribers 5.2M 18.7% of a 27.8M addressable base 5.2 million active Affirm Card cardholders at 30 June 2026, as disclosed in the FQ4'26 letter. Up 125% year over year.
Addressable subscribers 27.8M the S-curve ceiling 27.8 million active consumers, the disclosed base the card attaches to. Up 21% year over year.
Net adds 0/qtr ramping toward 0/qtr, throttled as the base approaches the TAM
Net-add ceiling 0/qtr what supply can deliver at full rate
ARPU $5.46/mo drifting −0.5% per quarter, floor $3.00 $5.46 a month: $85.2M over 5.2M cardholders over three months. Derived, not disclosed. The March quarter's $5.03 drifted to an expected $5.00; the quarter printed 8.5% above that.
Non-subscriber revenue $0/qtr growing 0.0% per quarter Zero. Every dollar of this line is carried by the cardholder count rather than split out.
Card network revenue

Latest: $183M (2031Q4E)

Period Value
2025Q2 $58M
2025Q3 $59M
2025Q4 $67M
2026Q1 $69M
2026Q2 $73M
2026Q3 $66M
2026Q4 $85M
2027Q1E $93M
2027Q2E $100M
2027Q3E $106M
2027Q4E $113M
2028Q1E $119M
2028Q2E $125M
2028Q3E $130M
2028Q4E $136M
2029Q1E $141M
2029Q2E $146M
2029Q3E $150M
2029Q4E $155M
2030Q1E $159M
2030Q2E $163M
2030Q3E $167M
2030Q4E $170M
2031Q1E $174M
2031Q2E $177M
2031Q3E $180M
2031Q4E $183M

Assumptions & reasoning

  • Modelled as active cardholders times revenue per cardholder because those are the disclosed numbers that move this line: 5.2 million active cardholders and $2.8B of Card GMV in FQ4'26, Card GMV up 124% and cardholders up 125% year over year.
  • The $5.46 a month is derived, not disclosed, and it is doing more work than a per-cardholder figure should. Card network revenue also carries virtual-card economics on wallet-partner volume that no cardholder generates, so read this as revenue per cardholder-equivalent rather than as what a cardholder is worth.
  • The attach frame held up. The model glided attach from 16.4% at 4.5% of the remaining gap a quarter, which implied 18.1% for June; Affirm reported 5.2 million cardholders against 27.8 million active consumers, which is 18.7%, and the letter rounds it to 19%. That is the one driver in this model the print confirmed rather than argued with, so the glide and the 55% ceiling are unchanged.
  • REVENUE PER CARDHOLDER WENT THE WRONG WAY FOR THE ASSUMPTION. The model drifts it down 0.5% a quarter and expected $5.00; the quarter delivered $5.46, up 8.5%. The level is moved to the reported one because that is what a roll-forward does, but the -0.5% drift is left in place: Card 0% APR GMV is still growing faster than the Card mix and 0% volume earns a merchant fee rather than interchange, so the direction of the assumption is still defensible even though two of the last two quarters have gone against it.
  • The consumer base is growing far faster than the 2% a quarter this model assumes - active consumers went 26.8M to 27.8M in one quarter, 3.7% sequentially and 21% year over year, against an assumption of roughly 8% a year. That gap widened this quarter and it suppresses the whole card line, because attach is applied to a base that grows too slowly here. Left alone; it is the second thing a future revision should settle.
AFRM model map

Explore another vertical