← Morgan Stanley

Weekly notes

MS on the radar · as of 2026-W34

· Anthropic announcement; StockMKTNewz trigger · positive

Anthropic confidentially submitted a draft S-1 on June 1. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are reportedly involved in both the Anthropic and OpenAI offerings, potentially making the fee pool material for two tracked banks.

Anthropic announced that it confidentially submitted a draft S-1 to the SEC on June 1. A social post framed an end-of-August public filing as highly likely, but that trigger was a paid partnership relaying a prediction-market probability, not a company timetable. The durable fact is the confidential submission. No public filing, ticker, exchange, share count, price range or offering date had been announced when this note was prepared. The event matters because Anthropic supplies the largest input in our SpaceX model-layer pool. That pool is $18.85 billion per quarter: $11.6 billion attributed to Anthropic, $6.7 billion to OpenAI and $550 million to Grok. Anthropic alone is roughly 62% of the denominator, and the model already labels the figure as press-reported and unaudited. When an S-1 becomes public, that number should become a filing-based revenue figure—or be corrected. Recording the assumption now creates a clean audit trail before the answer is known. The valuation arithmetic shows why the disclosure will attract attention. Annualising $11.6 billion produces $46.4 billion of revenue. A reported $965 billion May financing value implies about 20.8 times that run rate; secondary-market indications around $1.2 trillion imply roughly 25.9 times. Those references are not interchangeable: a primary financing, thin secondary trading and a forecast first-day market capitalisation measure different things. The banks matter too. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are reported to be involved in both the Anthropic and OpenAI processes. If both companies raise the amounts being discussed, the underwriting fee pool could matter even after the lower percentages normally negotiated for exceptionally large transactions. The key checks remain provenance and definitions. Is $11.6 billion actual quarterly revenue or an annualised run rate? Are the reported offering sizes primary capital or valuation figures? What percentage could the banks actually earn? Until the public S-1 answers them, the note is a watch item rather than a revenue estimate for Morgan Stanley.

Source →